Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Montana Surveys of Enacted Curriculum Project William Schauman, Gail Surwill, Lisa Scott and Jodi Rookhuizen Presentation for CCSSO 2008 Education Leaders.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Montana Surveys of Enacted Curriculum Project William Schauman, Gail Surwill, Lisa Scott and Jodi Rookhuizen Presentation for CCSSO 2008 Education Leaders."— Presentation transcript:

1 Montana Surveys of Enacted Curriculum Project William Schauman, Gail Surwill, Lisa Scott and Jodi Rookhuizen Presentation for CCSSO 2008 Education Leaders Conference September 8-10, 2008 Milwaukee, WI

2 Agenda MSEC State Overview MSEC District Perspective MSEC School and Classroom Perspective MSEC Next Steps Questions

3 Montana – Big Sky Country!

4 Montana Montana Standards Standards (Intended) (Intended) Montana Montana Standards Standards (Intended) (Intended) Curriculum(Intended)Curriculum(Intended) Assessment Assessment(Assessed)(Learned) (Assessed)(Learned) ProfessionalDevelopmentProfessionalDevelopment Instruction Instruction(Enacted) (Enacted) 5YCEP CEI Process Montana Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum (MSEC) – Alignment Assessment Process The Five -Year Comprehensive Education Plan (5YCEP) Building a Continuous Education Improvement (CEI) Process for Montana Schools The Vision

5 Standards-Based Instruction - Alignment - Dialogue Interpretation of Data Current Practice/Curriculum Perspective Planning MSEC Data Assessment Data CRT Results I-Analyze Results Released Item Review Other District Data Insuring Effective Decisions! Individual Maps School/District/State Maps

6 Options for Action Plans Vertical/Horizontal Articulations Curriculum Modifications Pacing Guides Materials Development Professional Development Monitor Progress/Adjust

7 Phase I – Pilot Projects – 2005-2006 … making (M)SEC work for us! Poplar Billings Montana Small Schools Alliance Havre Libby Chester-Joplin- Inverness Prairie View Curriculum Consortium Wolf Point Title II Math/Science Partnership Grants St. Regis Huntley Project Troy Bozeman

8 Phase II – Developing the Model 2006 – 2009  Working with districts through a multi- year cycle  Taking on a limited number of new districts  Continue to build trainer corps

9 Phase III – Reconnecting Statewide 2009  Continue to support current projects  Promote use of MSEC through a variety of venues across the state  Title I will begin using it as an initial strategy when working with schools in need of improvement or in restructuring under NCLB

10 Billings Public Schools District use of SEC District Demographics District Goal Tool used to connect Curriculum, Instruction, Professional Development and Assessment Assessme nt PD Instructio n Curriculu m

11 11

12 First Steps… Examined current reality –State Standards, Enacted Curriculum, and State CRT Assessment Asked hard questions Challenging conversations

13 SEC Map Activity Take a few minutes to examine and discuss the contour maps Discuss the alignment of the four maps. Do you see any noticeable patterns? Describe the similarities and differences between the maps? What conclusions can you make? What content topics and/or cognitive levels would you suggest improving?

14 14 2005 Comparison – Standards, Instruction, and CRT

15 Identified Curriculum Points 7 th & 8 th Coarse Grain Maps the Same –Needed to examine Fine Grain Maps Shift Emphasis Build Trust District Learning Objectives Resources –Primary and supplemental Technology

16 Professional Development Decisions Primary Resource & Technology Training Summer Courses Math Professional Learning Communities District Math Meetings Math Coach

17 17 2005-2008 Comparison–Measurement–Gr 8 Instruction Maps

18 18 2005-2008 Comparison–Geo Concepts–Gr 8 Instruction Maps

19 19 Billings District Curriculum Maps – 7 th and 8 th Grades

20 Comparison – Gr 8 Curriculum, Instruction, and CRT The percentages come from the Gr 8 district avg points earned out of the points possible for each state standards content topic on the MT CRT. 40% 50% 33% 63% 50% 63% 50%67% 50% 58% 44% 63%

21 21 8 th Grade Comparison – Cognitive Demand 2005 - 2008

22 22

23 What does this all mean for me - the teacher? A Lot of Data! Our Struggle Self Reflection Change is a Process Where to Begin?

24 Anatomy of Change the 1 st Year In our district –SEC Maps –District Learning Objectives –Pacing Guides –Supplementary Lessons –SEC Instructional Practice Graphs

25 Anatomy of Change the 1 st Year In our school –Math Team 8 th Grade Math Lab –Interdisciplinary Teams Instructing Across Disciplines

26 Anatomy of Change the 1 st Year In my classroom –Learning Objectives in Lessons –Vocabulary –Facilitator –Student Discovery

27 Anatomy of Change the 2 nd Year In our district –Revisited SEC Maps –Revisited Pacing Guides –Writing Companion –Supplementary Lessons –Manipulatives

28 Anatomy of Change the 2 nd Year In our school –Interdisciplinary Team Continued Instructional Strategies Across Disciplines –Revisited Math Goals Continued 8 th Grade Math Lab

29 Anatomy of Change the 2 nd Year In my classroom –Lesson Reflection –Writing in Math –Cooperative Learning –Alternative Assessments Formative Assessments

30 Anatomy of Change the 3 rd Year In our district –Revisited SEC Maps –Revisited Pacing Guide –Writing Companion Revisited –District Math Meetings –Professional Learning Community Facilitated by Math Coach

31 Anatomy of Change the 3 rd Year In our school –Interdisciplinary Teams Cooperative Learning –7 th Grade Math Lab –Gifted and Talented

32 Anatomy of Change the 3 rd Year In my classroom –Lesson Reflection –Writing in Math –Cooperative Learning

33 Anatomy of Change this Year In our district –Revisited SEC Maps –Revisited Pacing Guides –Revisited Writing Companion –Summer Professional Development –Gifted and Talented Grant

34 Anatomy of Change this Year In our school –Instructional Strategies Team –Problem Solving –Department Collaboration

35 Anatomy of Change this Year In my classroom –Lesson Reflection –Writing in Math –Instructional Strategies –Interdisciplinary Lessons

36 36 Slowing Down the Conveyor Belt

37 Next Steps… Teacher Maps Common Formative Assessments Use Data Time Continue the process with High School Math

38 .....Who knows what else is to come….. “One thing is sure. We have to do something. We have to do the best we know how at the moment … if it doesn’t turn out right, we can modify it as we go along.” ~Franklin D. Roosevelt

39 Questions?

40 Thank You!! William Schauman, Montana Office of Public Instruction –wschauman@mt.gov Gail Surwill, Billings Public Schools –surwillg@billings.k12.mt.us Lisa Scott, Billings Public Schools –scottl@billings.k12.mt.us Jodi Rookhuizen, Castle Rock Middle School –rookhuizenj@billings.k12.mt.us


Download ppt "Montana Surveys of Enacted Curriculum Project William Schauman, Gail Surwill, Lisa Scott and Jodi Rookhuizen Presentation for CCSSO 2008 Education Leaders."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google