1. 2013-2014 Teacher Appraisal System Updates by: Dawn Capes, Coordinator for Teacher and Administrator Appraisal Systems

2. Handout Handouts will be referenced in this presentation It is available at the Project 8 website at http://www.bay.k12.fl.us/rttt/Project8.aspx http://www.bay.k12.fl.us/rttt/Project8.aspx

3. Oversight Committee Approved All information in this presentation has been approved by the Oversight Committee for Teacher and Administrator Appraisal Systems ABCE members, principals, and district staff

4. Agenda New: Option “C” Review: Option “B” IPDP information Assessment updates (K-3, PERT) Timeline updates 2013 Framework for Teaching Human Resources- Employee Information AIMS

5. Why Option B and C? Gone through the new Appraisal System process twice Listened to administrators and teachers Continually searching for ways to meet the law as well as the needs of administrators, teachers and students Option B and C are the result of this process

6. Handout- Page 2 Option BOption C Available to Category 3 & 4 teachers With HE/E 12/13 Summative RatingWith HE/E 12/13 Summative Rating AND HE/E Instructional Practice Ratings Who had a Direct Measurement for Student Growth for the 12/13 school year (FCAT, IB, AICE, AP, Dual Enrollment, FAA, and ESE using Brigance) Who had an Indirect Measurement for Student Growth (students who took FCAT but are not in an FCAT course) or who had a School Student Growth (K-3, guidance, media specialists, etc.) or who had a District Student Growth (MTSS, ESE Resource Teachers, etc.) for the 12/13 school year Agree that the 13/14 Instructional Practice (Domains 1-4) be equal to 13/14 Student Growth Score (unless Student Growth is NI or U; then the Instructional Practice score will be no less than E. Teacher does not receive Option B for following school year.) Agree that the 13/14 Instructional Practice Domains 2-3 will be based on 12/13 Instructional Practice Domains 2-3. No pre or post conference or formal observation 4 Classroom Walkthroughs (2 to ensure maintenance of Domains 1-4 4 Classroom Walkthroughs announced/2unannounced) to ensure maintenance of Domains 2-3. Note: The rating can change With written feedback provided by an administrator With written feedback provided by an administrator especially if maintenance is not observed or if performance rating will change Teacher completes IPDP Teacher completes evidence collection for Domain 1 (lesson plans and IPDP) and Domain 4 Option B extended by Principal and selected by teacher in AIMS Companion site Option C extended by Principal and selected by teacher in AIMS Companion site Option can be revoked

7. Review of Option B Available to Category 3 & 4 teachers With HE/E Summative Rating from 12/13 Who had a Direct Measurement for Student Growth for 12/13 school year (FCAT, IB, AICE, AP, Dual Enrollment, FAA, and ESE using Brigance) Agree that the 13/14 Instructional Practice (Domains 1-4) be equal to 13/14 Student Growth Score (unless Student Growth is NI or U; then the Instructional Practice score will be no less than E. Teacher does not receive Option B for following school year.) There is no pre or post conference or formal observation There are 4 Classroom Walkthroughs (2 announced/2 unannounced to ensure maintenance of Domains 1-4) With written feedback provided by an administrator Teacher completes IPDP Option B extended by Principal and selected by the teacher in AIMS Companion site Option can be revoked Handout Pg 2

8. New! Option C Available to Category 3 & 4 teachers With HE/E 12/13 Summative Rating AND HE/E Instructional Practice Rating Who had an Indirect Measurement for Student Growth (students who took FCAT but are not in an FCAT course) or who had a School Student Growth (K-3, guidance, media specialists, etc.) or who had a District Student Growth (MTSS, ESE Resource Teachers, etc.) for the 12/13 school year Agree that the 13/14 Instructional Practice Domains 2-3 will be based on 12/13 Instructional Practice Domains 2-3 There is no pre or post conference or formal observation There are 4 Classroom Walkthroughs (2 announced/2 unannounced) to ensure maintenance of Domains 2-3. Note: The rating can change. With written feedback provided by an administrator especially if maintenance is not observed or if performance rating will change The teacher completes evidence collection for Domain 1 (lesson plans and IPDP) and Domain 4 Option C is extended by Principal and selected by the teacher in AIMS Companion site Option can be revoked Handout Pg 2

9. Option B and C Currently, we do not know who can receive Option B and C. We do not have the Summative Ratings at this time. Time to think about it! We hope to have all Student Growth results in and applied to Summative ratings in September.

10. Pause Take a moment to reflect on the differences between Option B and Option C. What are the similarities? Differences? Given the Option for either one, would you take it, or not?

11. Individual Professional Development Plan Request by teachers and administrators serving on the Oversight Committee and IPDP sub committee to continue to clarify the rubric and provide training that will help with consistency across the district Changes have been made to the rubric Training to be provided during school-based inservice Goal of the training Understanding of the changes Explain the IPDP process Provide opportunities for rating collaboration

12. IPDP FYI SB1664 one word “Require” to “May” However – Race to the Top agreement states that the IPDP will be a metric in our “multi-metric system” – State Board of Education Protocol Standards for Professional Development include IPDP requirements DOEs ultimate goal is to revise policies so that goals can be achieved in a variety of ways (IPDP or PLC process, for example) IPDPs will still be completed for the 13/14 school year

13. FYI: More about SB1664 Classroom teachers For the 13/14 School Year, student growth can only be applied based on students served No School VAM for Classroom Teachers for 13/14 Can Use- Direct Measurements (FCAT, Alg I, FAA, IB, AICE, AP, Dual Enrollment, Brigance, Industry Certification, SAT 10, PERT) Indirect Measurements (FCAT Reading VAM based on students who took FCAT but not in an FCAT course, i.e. science) Non-classroom teachers Can use School VAM for Student Growth

14. New Assessment Additions K-2 SAT 10 (Common Core Aligned) Direct Measurement of Reading Post Test planned for the end of May All students enrolled during testing window will test 3 rd Grade FCAT Direct Measurement of Reading Math for College Readiness (MCR) and English IV: Florida College Prep PERT Direct Measurement Indirect Measurement of Reading where applicable Oversight Committee will meet in September and more information will be forthcoming

15. Pause Take a moment to discuss the new assessments, if they apply to you or your school. What questions and concerns do you have?

16. Detail Timeline Also Available at the Race to the Top, Project 8 link http://www.bay.k12.fl.us/rtt t/Project8.aspx http://www.bay.k12.fl.us/rtt t/Project8.aspx Handout Pgs 3-7

17. Take Note of These Dates DateItem October 24 (Page 3) Teacher submits draft IPDP to admin October 31 (Page 3) Admin provides feedback and rating January 17 (Page 3) IPDP Mid-Year review: NO Domain 4 review will be completed February 7 (Page 5) Teacher submits Domain 4 evidence February 14 (Page 5) Admin provides preliminary Domain 4 ratings March 14 (Page 7) All Walkthroughs for Option B and C are completed New

18. Yearly Timeline Also available at the RTTT Project 8 link http://www.bay.k12.fl.us/rttt /Project8.aspx http://www.bay.k12.fl.us/rttt /Project8.aspx

20. FYI: 2013 Framework for Teaching Intent of each item remains the same Provides examples for each component as well as critical attributes (guidance for observers) AIMS will continue to reflect the 2007 version; however, the 2013 version will be used in training to clarify components and calibrate teacher ratings provided by administrators Will not be uploaded to AIMS because Teachscape owns the digital rights All stakeholders are encouraged to download the Framework and use it as a reference guide http://www.danielsongroup.org/userfiles/files/downloads/20 13EvaluationInstrument.pdf http://www.danielsongroup.org/userfiles/files/downloads/20 13EvaluationInstrument.pdf

21. Pause Take a moment to discuss the timeline. What questions do you have? Think about the Framework for Teaching. What questions do you have?

22. FYI: Human Resources Information Answers those “What if….” types of questions Pulls all into one section of the manual Evaluation Process Dissatisfaction with Evaluation Evaluations and Corrective Action Remediation Process Handout Pgs 8-9

23. AIMS AIMS has undergone a FACELIFT! – Changes by both Truenorthlogic and the District Goal is to have a more user-friendly website – No more drop down arrows to find and click – Appearance is difference – Categories 1 & 2 and Categories 3 & 4 have been merged Step by step directions, with screen shots, provided to guide teachers through the process The self-assessment is available starting August 13 th When you are ready to complete your Self-Assessment, directions can be found at the Project 8 link at http://www.bay.k12.fl.us/rttt/Project8.aspx http://www.bay.k12.fl.us/rttt/Project8.aspx

24. Getting to Project 8 All Teacher Appraisal Information can be found by going to www.bay.k12.fl.us Employees Tab Race to the Top link on the left-hand side Then the Project 8 link Note: The 13/14 manual is not complete as the district awaits Student Growth updates from DOE.

25. Questions? Contact – Dawn Capes, Coordinator for Teacher and Administrator Appraisal Systems – 850-767-5449 – capesda@bay.k12.fl.us capesda@bay.k12.fl.us – @DawnCapes1 (for Teacher Appraisal System updates) Speak to your administrator Explore the resources available at the website