1. Data Slides for Children & Students with IEPs in 2010 Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services

2. Children & Students w/IEPs Age Groups

3. 3 Children with IEPs Ages 3-5 1997 – 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

4. 4 Students With IEPs Ages 6-21 1997 – 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

5. Students With IEPs Ages 22-26 1996 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

6. Students with IEPs Ages 22 – 26 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

7. Number of Students with IEPs Ages 13 - 21 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

8. Students with IEPs Ages 6 - 12 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

9. Students with IEPs Ages 3 - 5 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

10. 10 Students with IEPs by Age Groups in 2010 Age Groups Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

11. Identification Rates By Eligibility

12. Special Education Eligibility 1997 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

13. Identification Rates By Eligibility in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

14. Identification Rates By Eligibility in 2010 SLD SLI CI OHI EI ASD ECDD PI SXI HI VI TBI D/B Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

15. Trends in Disability Categories 1992-2010

16. 16 Cognitive Impairment 1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

17. 17 Emotional Impairment 1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

18. 18 Physical and Other Health Impairments 1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

19. 19 Early Childhood Developmental Delay 1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

20. 20 Severe Multiple Impairment 1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

21. 21 Visual Impairment 1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

22. 22 Hearing Impairment 1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

23. 23 Speech and Language Impairment 1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

24. 24 Physical (PI) & Other Health Impairments (OHI) 1991 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

25. 25 Specific Learning Disability 1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

26. 26 Specific Learning Disability Eligibility Age Groups 2002 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

27. 27 Autism Spectrum Disorder 1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

28. Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age - 2008 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

29. Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age - 2009 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

30. Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

31. Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age – 2008, 2009 and 2010 Compared Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age - 2008 through 2010 Compared Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

32. Race/Ethnicity for Students w/IEPs

33. Race/Ethnicity Ages 3-26 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

34. Gender for Students with IEPs

35. 35 Gender by Age Groups in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

36. 36 Gender Distribution of Students with IEPs Ages 3-26 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

37. Educational Environments for Students with IEPs

38. 38 Educational Environment Students with IEPs Ages 3 – 5 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

39. 39 Educational Environment Students with IEPs Ages 6-12 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

40. 40 Educational Environment Students with IEPs Ages 13-21 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

41. 41 Educational Environment Students with IEPs Ages 6-21 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

42. Educational Environment Students with IEPs Ages 22 – 26 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

43. State Performance Plan Indicator Performance

44. Graduation* for Students with IEPs Target is 80% *Calculations using Cohort Four-Year Graduation Rate Methodology and using OSEP’s Prescribed One Year Data Lag Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

45. Dropout* for Students with IEPs Target is <10% *Calculation using Consolidated State Performance Report Event Dropout Rate Methodology, and using OSEP’s Prescribed One Year Data Lag. Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

46. Indicator 3A: AYP percent = [(# of districts with a disability subgroup that meets the State’s minimum “n” size that meet the State’s AYP targets for the disability subgroup) divided by the (total # of districts that have a disability subgroup that meets the State’s minimum “n” size)] times 100. Source: Michigan Department of Education, Bureau of Assessment and Accountability Measurable and Rigorous Targets FFYBaselineTargetActual 2005100% 2006 88.0%92.7% 2007 91.0%98.5% 2008 94.0%99.4% 2009 97.0%99.7%

47. Indicator 4A: Rates of suspension and expulsion: Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of children with disabilities for greater than 10 days in a school year. Source: Single Record Student Database, verification review Measurable and Rigorous Targets FFYBaselineTargetActual Calculations Using Previous Definition of Significant Discrepancy* 2005 1.2% 2006 < 10.0% 1.5% 2007 < 9.0% 1.4% OSEP Prescribed a One Year Data Lag for This Indicator 2008 (2007-2008 data) < 9.0%1.4% Calculations Using Current Definition of Significant Discrepancy 2009 (2008-2009 data) 5.1%< 5.5%5.1% *Definition of Significant Discrepancy: A district was identified as having a significant discrepancy in rates of suspensions and expulsions if more than five percent of its students with IEPs received out- of-school suspensions/expulsions for greater than 10 days cumulatively during the school year. Districts with fewer than five students with IEPs suspended/expelled for more than ten days were exempt from significant discrepancy calculations. This new protocol was reported in Michigan’s FFY 2008 State Performance Plan (SPP).

48. Indicator 5A: Increase the percentage of students served inside the regular class 80% or more of the time. Measurable and Rigorous Targets A. Increase the percentage of students served inside the regular class 80% or more of the day FFYBaselineTargetActual 200554.0% 2006> 55.0%50.3% 2007> 57.0%53.5% 2008> 59.0%57.6% 2009> 61.0%61.1% Source: Michigan Compliance Information System

49. Indicator 9: Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Measurable and Rigorous Targets FFYBaselineTargetActual 20060.3%0% 20070%0.3% 2008 0% 0.1% 2009 0% 0.1% Sources: Michigan Compliance Information System, Single Record Student Database, Michigan Student Data System

50. Indicator 10: Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification. Measurable and Rigorous Targets FFYBaselineTargetActual 20051.7% 20060%3.2% 20070%1.7% 20080%1.4% 20090%0.9% Sources: Michigan Compliance Information System, Single Record Student Database, Michigan Student Data System

51. Indicator 11: Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated within 30 days or a mutually agreed upon extension. Compliance target is 100%. Source: Michigan Student Data System