Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHilda Copeland Modified over 9 years ago
1
Scenario S: Preferred Alternative
2
Scenario S: Creating Mixed-use Centers Around Major Transportation Areas Is The Primary Driver Of Improved Transportation Performance Plan a range of mixed use centers around transit –A few regional centers –Many neighborhood centers –Close access to centers throughout the Vistas
3
Scenario S: Creating Mixed-use Centers Around Major Transportation Areas Is The Primary Driver Of Improved Transportation Performance Plan a range of mixed use centers around transit –A few regional centers –Many neighborhood centers –Close access to centers throughout the Vistas
4
Scenario S: Creating Mixed-use Centers Around Major Transportation Areas Is The Primary Driver Of Improved Transportation Performance Plan a range of mixed use centers around transit –A few regional centers –Many neighborhood centers –Close access to centers throughout the Vistas
5
Scenario S: Enhanced Network 7 Bus corridors Within ½ mile of transit: –30% Households –47% Jobs +19% +28%
6
Scenario X: Basecase
7
Scenario X Land Use Parameters Half the housing units and jobs of Scenario A –202,500 Housing Units 80% single family housing Averaging about ~6 dwelling units per net acre (3-4 per gross), similar to single family prevalent in the Gold Canyon and San Tan Valley areas –150,000 Jobs Primarily strip commercial with some office Retail and employment centers located at freeway and arterial intersections Small amount of multi-family located around interchanges and employment centers Less environmental sensitivity and open space –More encroachment into washes –Development on slopes –Fewer parks, more golf courses
8
Scenario X Transportation Parameters No regional transit, limited local transit Freeways built as planned Highway 60 and 79 expanded to 6 lane expressways, but with surface intersections Extension of existing major arterials –Follow conventional arterial pattern of one arterial per mile (use section lines)
9
Comparing Scenario S and X Scenario X: BasecaseScenario S: Preferred Alternative
10
Total Population
11
Total Housing Units
12
Total Jobs
13
Developed Acres % of site
14
Vehicle Miles Traveled (per person per day)
15
Walk/Bike Trips (% of Total)
16
Daily Transit Ridership
17
Transportation Emissions (CO2) Tons of CO2 per Year
18
Transportation Emissions (CO2) Tons of CO2 per Year Per Capita
19
Transportation Energy Use Gallons of Gas per Day per Person
20
Jobs-Housing Balance
21
Housing Mix Comparison Scenario X continues current trends, Scenario S anticipates future demographic shifts and changing housing needs.
22
Employment Mix Comparison
23
Building Emissions (CO2) Annual CO2 (ton/yr) Building emissions are lower in Scenario X because employment buildings use more energy
24
Building Emissions (CO2) Annual CO2 (ton/yr) Per Capita Building emissions are lower in Scenario X because employment buildings use more energy
25
Total Water Demand (Gallons/day - Building and Landscaping)
26
Total Water Demand (Gallons/day - Building and Landscaping) Per Capita
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.