Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Duke NIRL Hosted MIRIAD Data Both XNAT and HID.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Duke NIRL Hosted MIRIAD Data Both XNAT and HID."— Presentation transcript:

1 Duke NIRL Hosted MIRIAD Data http://nirlarc.duhs.duke.edu Both XNAT and HID

2 Multispectral Segmentation 1.5T and 3T 1.5T Segmentation 3T Segmentation Source scans: proton density, T1-w, T2-w, FLAIR Automated segmentation of gray, white matter, csf and lesion (red). Shown overlaid on proton density image (showing just skull, surface tissues and reference tube outside skull)

3 Lesion Simulation Fractional Contrast for Lesion to White Matter, 3T data PD- weighted T1 weightedT2-weightedFLAIR Mean0.299168-0.129350.882101140.356158 Standard Deviation (SD) of Mean0.0413010.0203950.134351560.097343 SD/Mean0.138053-0.157670.1523085670.273315 VSL=volume of segmented lesion inside of true lesion (True positives) VNSL=volume of nonsegmented lesion inside of true lesion (False negatives) VNL=volume of non-lesion outside of true lesion (True negatives) VLOL=volume of segmented lesion outside of true lesion (False positives) sensitivity=VSL/(VSL+VNSL) specificity=VNL/(VNL+VLOL) accuracy=VSL/(VSL+VLOL) For this example we have sensitivity = 0.73, specificity = 0.89 and accuracy=0.46.

4 SENSE DTI Image Distortion Correction B 0 and eddy current maps distorted SENSE DTI images corrected SENSE DTI images difference

5 AVID software for fMRI-guided fiber tracking

6 Toward Quantitative Fiber Volume Measurement Left Column: Conventional Euler’s method Right Column: Improved streamline tracking method with RK4 algorithm.

7 Unit Hausdorff Distance vs NEX

8 = FA>0.3 FA vs NEX

9 FA=0.32 FA=0.31 Deviation Angle vs NEX FA=0.30FA=0.27 = FA>0.3


Download ppt "Duke NIRL Hosted MIRIAD Data Both XNAT and HID."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google