Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAnthony Walker Modified over 9 years ago
1
Duke NIRL Hosted MIRIAD Data http://nirlarc.duhs.duke.edu Both XNAT and HID
2
Multispectral Segmentation 1.5T and 3T 1.5T Segmentation 3T Segmentation Source scans: proton density, T1-w, T2-w, FLAIR Automated segmentation of gray, white matter, csf and lesion (red). Shown overlaid on proton density image (showing just skull, surface tissues and reference tube outside skull)
3
Lesion Simulation Fractional Contrast for Lesion to White Matter, 3T data PD- weighted T1 weightedT2-weightedFLAIR Mean0.299168-0.129350.882101140.356158 Standard Deviation (SD) of Mean0.0413010.0203950.134351560.097343 SD/Mean0.138053-0.157670.1523085670.273315 VSL=volume of segmented lesion inside of true lesion (True positives) VNSL=volume of nonsegmented lesion inside of true lesion (False negatives) VNL=volume of non-lesion outside of true lesion (True negatives) VLOL=volume of segmented lesion outside of true lesion (False positives) sensitivity=VSL/(VSL+VNSL) specificity=VNL/(VNL+VLOL) accuracy=VSL/(VSL+VLOL) For this example we have sensitivity = 0.73, specificity = 0.89 and accuracy=0.46.
4
SENSE DTI Image Distortion Correction B 0 and eddy current maps distorted SENSE DTI images corrected SENSE DTI images difference
5
AVID software for fMRI-guided fiber tracking
6
Toward Quantitative Fiber Volume Measurement Left Column: Conventional Euler’s method Right Column: Improved streamline tracking method with RK4 algorithm.
7
Unit Hausdorff Distance vs NEX
8
= FA>0.3 FA vs NEX
9
FA=0.32 FA=0.31 Deviation Angle vs NEX FA=0.30FA=0.27 = FA>0.3
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.