1. SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008

2. SHMS experiment requirements Hall C 12 GeV experiments can be categorized according to their requirements for understanding the SHMS acceptance –L/T separations (e.g. F π, factorization) require pt-to-pt systematic of 0.4% in a momentum region of -15% to +10% –Asymmetry measurements ok with 1.0-2.0% systematic ExperimentTargetSHMS angles (deg) Fpi12, P128-cm5.5-13 (~23) R=σ L /σ T 15-cm5.5 x>115-cm8.0-16.0 g2, (A1N)40-cm11-15.5, (5.5-30.0) G Ep 30-cm15.7-25.0 PV LD 2 40-cm13.5 L/T separations

3. Context The purpose of the collimator is to define a geometrical acceptance in which the spectrometer optical properties are sufficiently well understood Acceptance depends on dp/p (δ) and target length –Characterized through event loss: Acceptance=1-loss Geometric effects (apertures) – well understood Efficiency of the optical transport – more difficult to model Sieve slit allows for studies of the variation of optical properties over the full solid angle acceptance of the spectrometer –Populate a region simultaneously with many particle trajectories

4. SHMS horizontal acceptance Acceptance limited by well known magnet sizes and magnet gradients Losses before the dipole are dominated by the aperture of Q1 The figure shows the δ dependence of the acceptance after the quadrupoles –Events in the red region fall outside of at least one of the nominal detector apertures –The green lines denote the acceptance determined by the nominal detector configuration -10% < δ < +22%

5. SHMS collimator placement Design will be octagonal shape Dimensions depend on location in z Q1Q2Q3HBD Possible sieve collimator locations y x Sieve collimator in front of HB: standard optics calibration may be complicated –Aperture defining slits: best location in front of HB Sieve collimator in front of Q1: optics modeling straightforward, but have to assume that perturbations due to HB are small

6. Collimated SHMS acceptance Slit at 110 cm (HB)Slit at 267 cm (Q1) Acceptance excludes losses before the dipole and detector geometry The yellow and blue bands indicate the maximum δ range for L/T separations at positive δ

7. Collimator reduces uncertainties due to optics Event loss at Q1 due to geometric effects Acceptance at dipole entrance depends on aperture and δ –Events at negative δ are focused more +10% < δ < +15% Collimator can eliminate events that would be lost inside the dipole –Reduces model dependent systematic uncertainty Q1Q1 Q2Q2 Q3Q3 D

8. Collimated SHMS acceptance corrected for loss at the dipole entrance Acceptance shows losses inside the dipole and exit Understanding of losses inside the dipole could be improved through optics studies using actual data or precise mapping of the fields Slit at 110 cm (HB)Slit at 267 cm (Q1)

9. SHMS Collimator Summary Small collimator could be used for L/T separations –good understanding of acceptance function In general, size of the collimator depends on the target length –Effective target length for all L/T separations is <3cm –May need a special small collimator for extended targets typically used in asymmetry measurements –Large collimator also possible if rates more important than systematics Shape: octagonal, material: heavymet –thickness: same as for HMS (6.3cm), but still under study –dimensions in x and y depend on location in z – both locations in front of HB and Q1 would be possible Mechanical design: currently fixed, but moving design may also be feasible

10. SHMS sieve slit design Size of sieve holes: 3 mrad –For comparison: HMS sieve holes diameter is 0.504cm (3 mrad) Further studies of the focal plane patterns will determine the optimal design for optics reconstruction Z=110cmZ=267cm Sieve slit is used to understand the optics properties the spectrometer Figures show simulations of possible sieve hole configurations

11. SHMS Optics: plans Implement real magnets in the Monte Carlo –Current SHMS Monte Carlo uses ideal magnets HB field map differences – effect on optics –Initial check by J. LeRose using SNAKE –Final studies will be done using COSY after real magnets are implemented

12. Study of SHMS detector sizes Nominal target length and angle set by approved experiments –40cm target, 40deg Scattering chamber can accommodate 50cm targets DetectorZ (cm) Xsize (cm) Ysize (cm) Atm. Cer-310 to -607080 DC1-407580 DC2+408590 C 4 F 10 Cer+70 to +250115100 Calorimeter+280 to +360130120 Values are given for the back of the detectors Beam envelope at selected detector locations

13. SHMS further studies SHMS horizontal bender prototype tests for radiative heating studies –Performed prototype tests in summer 2006 Analysis is complete Improvement of MC requires more data –Additional measurement near end of G Ep with improved sensitivity less than 100 mK Detector hut shielding –Initial estimate from PDG: 1-2m concrete –More detailed simulation for SHMS structure review in March 2008 SHMS 18° vertical bend Q1Q2Q3HBD

14. SHMS information updates Documentation about SHMS R&D and upgrade in Hall C 12 GeV database –http://www.hallcweb.jlab.org/doc-public/DocumentDatabasehttp://www.hallcweb.jlab.org/doc-public/DocumentDatabase User: 12gev Password: xxxxxxxx (hornt@jlab.org for password)hornt@jlab.org Updates to the 12 GeV web site currently are currently located here: http://www.jlab.org/~hornt/hallc_12gev/hallc_12gev.html Nominal SHMS parameters Links to: –Experiment requirements –Document database –SHMS Optics studies Other 12 GeV links: –Monte Carlo –Spectrometer Layout