1. Fall Final Presentation November 30, 2004 MAVerick Solutions Todd Adkins Leroy Cohen Jr. Adam Hollrith Brian Moore

2. OVERVIEW OVERVIEW  Objectives  Wing Concepts  Deployment Mechanisms  Design Analysis  Cost Analysis  Current Work  Future Work

3. Objectives  Design and fabricate component technology that will provide a MAV the capability to collapse/fold all wing surfaces along the body of the fuselage  Assess current materials and technologies that will maximize subsystem performance and minimize size and weight (i.e. composites, plastic actuators)  Demonstrate final concept design at Eglin AFB  Furnish final report documenting project objective, approach, results, budget analysis for hardware used, and conclusions/recommendations

4. Specifications

5. Wing Concepts  Concept #1  Involves a pair of wings that fold along the sides of the fuselage  Pros - Compact design  Cons - Complicated deployment path - Multiple driving mechanisms - Two separately moving wings

6. Wing Concepts  Concept #2  Involves a one-piece, rotating wing  Pros - Simple deployment - Compact design - One rotating mechanism - One-piece wing design  Cons - Concentrated stress on single support - Possible interference with tail of MAV

7. Wing Concepts  Concept #3  Involves a bi-wing design that will allow for greater lift capabilities and improved glide slope  Pros - Greater lift capabilities than concept 2 - One-piece wing design - Central rotating mechanism  Cons - Possible wing interference - Greater weight

8. Wing Concepts  Concept #4  Comprised of a two-wing system that simply rotates into deployment  The wings overlap on the top of the vehicle fuselage while stowed  Pros - Simple and quick deployment - Compact design  Cons -Interference caused by overlapping wings - Two wing attachment points

9. Wing Concepts  Concept #5  Comprised of one central connection between the wings and the fuselage  Both wings will rotate from the same point  Pros -Central rotation point -Compact design -Simple and quick deployment  Cons -Interference from overlapping wings -Relatively more complex concentric shafts

10. Actuator Deployment

11. Linkage Deployment

12. Gear Set Deployment

13. Design Analysis - Lift and Drag

15. Design Analysis – Linkages

17. Design Analysis – Gears

18. Servos Cost Analysis Blue Arrow Cirrus CS Micro JST HE 490 Hitec HS-55 BA-TS

19. Connectors & Rods Cost Analysis

20. Gears Cost Analysis

21. Pro-E Drawings

25. Current Work  Incorporate Fuselage from Sponsor  Compile component order list  Continue researching component material

26. Future Work  Construct several prototypes of the MAV  Test the deployment systems  Operations Manual  Webpage  Final Report  Open House

27. Summary  Objectives  Wing Concepts  Deployment Mechanisms  Design Analysis  Cost Analysis  Current Work  Future Work

28. References  http://www.eflightdesigns.com/cgi-bin/products.cgi?CAT=23  http://www.nyblimp.com/superior/carbon-rods.htm  http://www.robotcombat.com/marketplace_carbonfiber.html  http://www.stevensaero.addr.com/e-flight_servos.html  http://www.hobbypeople.net/gallery/877815.asp  http://www.nyltite.com/L20.html  https://sdp-si.com/eStore/  http://www.nyblimp.com/superior/DB.htm

29. QUESTIONS ???