Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Operations for Suspected Appendicitis How good are we? Kim Bailey CT2.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Operations for Suspected Appendicitis How good are we? Kim Bailey CT2."— Presentation transcript:

1 Operations for Suspected Appendicitis How good are we? Kim Bailey CT2

2 Background Methods Results Discussion Conclusions

3 Background Appendicetomy commonest acute general surgical procedure Diagnosis and surgery within 24 hours of hospital admission reduces complication rates Role of imaging increasing 15-20% acceptable rate of negative appendicetomy

4 Methods Retrospective Collection over a 3 month period 100 cases Data on age, sex, consultant in charge, length of time to surgery, scan, time to scan, length of stay and histology T-test used to determine significance

5 Results Average Age: 32 yrs (16 – 79 yrs) 38 Males : 62 Females 61 CR : 39 UGI Scans (56% of suspected cases) – 39 USS – 14 CT – 3 CT KUB 9 (24%) Males received scans (4 USS, 3 CT, 2 CT KUB )

6 The Surgery 100 cases – 79 Laparoscopic Appendicetomies – 14 Diagnostic Laparoscopies – 5 Laparoscopic converted to open procedures – 1 Acute Right hemicolectomy (histology – crohns) – 1 Laparotomy 14% negative rate – macroscopically normal appendix

7 So are we doing our surgery within 24 hours of hospital admission?? …………………………………………. No

8 Time From Admission to Surgery 50% of cases went within 24hrs Average: 28.46 (5.08 – 82.02) – CR 26.01 – UGI 32.30 T-test p value = 0.01

9 The Other Times Average time from admission to scan: CR: 16.04 (-2.49 – 70.31) UGI: 14.21 (-2.03 – 55.21) Average time from scan to surgery: CR: 19.00 (2.22 -78.19) UGI: 28.46 (7.23 – 60.57) Average time post surgery to discharge: CR: 50.21 (15.23 - 496.31) UGI: 43.23 (3.21 – 196.51) Average length of stay in hospital: CR: 77.30 (26.51 – 506.44) UGI: 75.43 (26 -231.54)

10 Consultant Data Consultant:No of CasesAverage time to Surgery Longest Waiter JA1715.4228.39 DM/Locum317.3727.14 IH619.3531.22 JG1223.0036.33 PS825.5746.09 KW731.3467.57 HOG933.1491.29 PJ635.2458.00 ZK1137.1482.02 JH1337.4096.11 GD439.1366.51 DD443.3070.56

11

12 Histology 86 Appendixes – 44 Acute Appendicitis – 9 necrosing/gangernous/perforated – 11 Normal – 7 None – 6 Faecolith present, no signs of appendicitis – 3 Lymphoid Hyperplasia – 2 Periappendicitis – 4 Variety Old healed appendicitis, foreign body at tip, hemicolectomy (crohns), distal fibrous obliteration,

13 25 % NEGATIVE APPENDICECTOMY RATE If you include diagnostic laparoscopies… Excluding 7 Cases…..

14 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS….

15 Conclusion We take too long to get suspected appendicitis to theatre Currently have a higher than average negative appendicetomy rate Clinic signs v’s radiological evidence More data needed Re-audit of practice to see improvement

16 Questions?


Download ppt "Operations for Suspected Appendicitis How good are we? Kim Bailey CT2."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google