2. NACTEI Conference Palm Springs, CA May 19, 2006

3. Presentation Overview Setting the Context Update on Legislation Themes in New Legislation Next Steps, Timing and Resources

4. Context Matters!!! Economic Social Policy

5. National Policy Influencers - Economic President’s FY07 proposal cuts education, workforce & social service programs by close to $5 billion Many competing pressures on budget  International Presence  Tax cuts  Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid  Hurricanes Relief  National Security

6. National Policy Influencers - Economic The World is Flat influence. Globalization and its impact on America’s competitiveness.  Concern about trade deficit.  Concern about skills gap.  Beginning to hear discussion about duplicative programs – sunset commission and OIG report at OVAE. source: Dept. of Commerce

7. ‘Social’ Influencers Education remains top domestic issue. Increased awareness about student achievement (school report cards, etc.) Prevailing sentiment of a devalued high school diploma.

8. ‘Social’ Influencer A strongly and widely held belief that the system is broken.  “American high schools are obsolete. By obsolete, I mean that our high schools, even when they are working exactly as designed, cannot teach our kids what they need to know today. Training the workforce of tomorrow with high schools of today is like trying to teach kids about today’s computers on a 50-year-old mainframe. It’s the wrong tool for the times.” --- Bill Gates, Founder and Chairman, Microsoft Corp.

9. ‘Social’ Influencers More careers require postsecondary experiences (degree, certificate or credential). Disconnect between what we need to support our economy and student interest.

10. ‘Social’ Influencers Increasing dissatisfaction with workforce’s preparation both by employers and postsecondary institutions. Demographics.

11. ‘Social’ Influencers Demand for public accountability. Demonstrated return on investment Focus on the use of public funds on demonstrated, effective strategies

12. National Policy Influencers Legislative responses:  Focus on: High schools Effective transitions STEM Competitiveness Achievement Accountability  NCLB reauthorization  Election year politics

13. Congress Introduces Bills 2004 Before the President’s proposal, both House and Senate re- introduce their Perkins reauthorization proposals.

14. … and then the President’s Budget Proposal President’s proposal - Eliminate Perkins. Rationale – PART Review Perkins is Ineffective

15. President’s Budget proposal Repeat of 2004 budget proposal. Same rationale despite GAO report (10-05).  “Most PART recommendations are focused on improving outcome measures and data collection, and are not designed to result in observable short- term performance improvements.”  “There is limited evidence to date of the PART’s influence on outcome-based program results. “ Source - GAO 06-28 “Performance Budgeting: PART Focuses Attention on Program Performance, but More Can Be Done to Engage Congress

16. Congressional Review Great opportunity for community input Hearing focus on CTE successes Congress expresses desire to build on current law NOT begin again

17. Congressional Review Supportive yet reality is that we had little data to prove impact Supportive yet reality is that we had little research to prove effective methods

18. Congress Acts – Unanimously!!! Congress introduces and passes legislation overwhelming  H.R. 366 (416 – 9)  S. 250 (99-0)

19. Major Legislative Themes Increased accountability  NCLB as academic achievement measure  Separate secondary and postsecondary measures  Performance levels negotiated with the state  Meet performance goals or: Improvement plan Loss of funding

20. Major Legislative Themes Leading CTE of the 21 st century  Global competition  Eliminating restrictions to sub-baccalaureate careers  Entry level, narrow preparation is not sufficient

21. Major Legislative Themes  Creating options by ensuring dual preparation – college and careers  Strengthen articulation  Extend integration  Increase rigor – technical assessments 

22. Major Legislative Themes Responsiveness to the labor market  High skill  High wage  High demand  Increased career information

23. Major Legislative Themes How does the Congress envision achieving these goals? Incentive new models of CTE  Model sequences of courses (H.R. 366)  Career pathways (S. 250)

24. Leading Change in CTE: Career Pathways Minimally, each local grant recipient is required to implement at least one career pathway/model sequence of courses. Must include BOTH the secondary and postsecondary portion.

25. Still to be decided … Tech Prep State Administration Accountability

26. Still to be decided … Funding

27. Next Steps and Resources Resolution of differences between bills through conference committee Hopefully finish up soon One year transition Resources:  Conference priorities: http://www.careertech.org/publications/Top_Perkins_Priorities.pd f http://www.careertech.org/publications/Top_Perkins_Priorities.pd f  Side by side: http://www.careertech.org/publications/Perkins%20side%20by% 20side%2005-10-05%20(2).doc http://www.careertech.org/publications/Perkins%20side%20by% 20side%2005-10-05%20(2).doc

28. Thoughts to ponder … What is your vision for CTE and then how does Perkins fit? This should be a plan not an application for federal funding. Be true to the legislative intent – these funds are to lead change and improve programs not be sustenance.

29. Thoughts to ponder … Who and how will you engage stakeholder groups? What will your local application look like? Should be a focus on quality!  Business advisory committees?  Documented alignment to standards?  Use of data in decision-making?  Role of demand  Caps or mandatory minimums on uses of funds for certain items.

30. Thoughts to ponder … Didn’t get into legislation but there was sure talk of it:  Statewide articulation  No use of funds on equipment to instead focus on teaching and learning.  4-year colleges.

31. Thank you! Any Questions? Contact Information: Kimberly Green kgreen@careertech.org