Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAnnabella Copeland Modified over 9 years ago
1
BSR TeMo/Up-TeMo Gunnar Lindberg NORDREGIO ESPON Seminar “Territories Acting for Economic Growth: Using territorial evidence to meet challenges towards 2020” Inspire policy making by territorial evidence
2
Nordregio (Lead Partner) (also in Up-TeMo) University of Gdansk (also in Up-TeMo) Aalto University (also in Up-TeMo) RRG (also in Up-TeMo) Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Polish Academy of Sciences BGI Consulting Ltd. Geomedia LLC Project Partners
5
“Need to strengthen a policy oriented territorial analysis Policymakers, stakeholders and practitioners involvement during analysis definition, development and validation” - Graziella Guaragno, Workshop 1.A (yesterday)
6
What we have built Stakeholder driven, policy centered, indicator based, and analytically advanced, monitoring of territorial dev. in the BRS region
8
Added value of TeMo Regional policy context It is operational at NUTS 3/LAU2. Parts of Russia included, and to some extent Belarus We show (one way) to analyse territorial cohesion
9
Indicators… the “never ending story”
11
(1.) The Gini Concentration Ratio (2.) The Atkinson index (3.) The 80/20 ratio (4.) Sigma-convergence (5.) Beta-convergence (6.) The east/west ratio (7.) The south/north ratio (8.) The urban/rural ratio (9.) The non-border/border ratio (10.) The coast/inland ratio Analytical “toolbox” / Complex indicators ”Distribution” ”Convergence” ”Targeted/Territorial”
15
Application of the System Testing of the monitoring system: to establish the functionality of the system by pushing its analytical capacity in a selection of “real life situations”. Investigative areas (topics): ability to handle cross-cutting issues (territorial cohesion); functionality within a pronounced thematic focus (migration); functionality to depict a particular geographic scope (border regions); overall benchmarking ability (BSR benchmarked against the Alpine Space and the North Sea transnational regions).
16
The Principal Divides (1): East-West Between more and less affluent countries. The sharpest divide today can be found within the socio-economic spheres of development. In terms of for instance poverty or health, the BSR displays a substantial variation.
17
Between rural and urban areas: with very few exceptions the rural areas generally occupy the bottom positions regarding most aspects of socio-economic development. The financial crisis also appears to have affected rural migration harder than any other type of regions. And, Some of the most pronounced disparities in GDP/capita can be found between urban/rural areas – rather than between countries. The Principal Divides (3): Urban–Rural
18
Migration: trends 2005-2010
19
Benchmarking
21
Comparison with EU territory
25
Looking forward! “Upholding” TeMo Updating indicators Adding an “urban” dimension Further understanding of stakeholder needs
30
Thank you! http://bsr.espon.eu/opencms/opencms
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.