1. Planning for Clean Air and Conformity: Connecting the SIP to the Transportation System Jeff Riley Houston, TX May 30, 2007

2. The Many Sources of Air Pollution

3. Source: When Smoke Ran Like Water, Devra Davis, Perseus Books Donora, Pennsylvania

4. "Night at Noon." London's Piccadilly Circus at midday, during another deadly smog episode, this time in the winter of 1955. Source: When Smoke Ran Like Water, Devra Davis, Perseus Books Central London during the killer smog, December 1952. At this point, visibility is less than 30 feet. During the height of the smog, people could not see their own hands or feet, and buses had to be led by policemen walking with flares. Source: When Smoke Ran Like Water, Devra Davis, Perseus Books London “Smog Episode” December 1952 Source:Why the Great Smog of London Was Anything but Great By ERIC NAGOURNEY

5. Houston Air Quality

6. HGB NOx Emissions - 2009 Nonroad (32%) Point (21%) Area (9%) On-road (38%) Source: TCEQ, May 2007 Total: 444 tpd NOx

7. Trends in Region 6 Our two moderate areas (DFW, Houston) face significant challenges in implementing control strategies in time to show attainment by 2009

8. 1-HR SIP 8-HR SIP 84 124 Houston Ozone Trends

9. 1990 - Clean Air Act Amended to its Present Form There have been many iterations of federal clean air legislation, beginning in 1955.

10. What is a State Implementation Plan (SIP)? A specific plan required by the CAA to achieve the NAAQS in all nonattainment areas Required by federal law SIPs are developed by States (with local input) and submitted to US EPA for approval through federal rulemaking After US EPA approval, these SIPs and associated control measures are enforceable at both the state and national levels

11. SIP Development Process These components form the state’s plan, or SIP The State Plan to meet the NAAQS

12. 1-Hr / 8-Hr Transition 8-Hr ozone designations effective June 15, 2004. The 1-Hr ozone standard was revoked on June 15, 2005. HGB area classified as “moderate” under the 8-Hr. Attainment year 2009

13. Houston 8-Hour Timeline Base case modeling complete 2009 inventory complete 2009 modeling Control strategy development Rule development complete SIP proposal in Dec. 2006 SIP Adoption in May 2007 SIP submittal to EPA no later than June 15, 2007 20062007 Comment period closed Feb 12, 2006

14. TCEQ Houston 8-HR SIP Proposal Proposed on December 13, 2006; comment period closed February 12, 2007 Illustrates a need for ~250 tpd of NOx reductions –Proposes 4 tpd (transportation measures, TxLED for marine fuels) –Some reductions will come from implementation of Federal measures Does not demonstrate attainment for any year (current attainment year is 2009) EPA is encouraging TCEQ to request a reclassification to a later year and to work with us to identify additional control measures

16. Status of 8-hr Litigation Court ruled on Dec 22, 2006 for vacature of EPA’s rule. At issue: –Revocation of 1-hr NAAQS –Subpart 1 vs Subpart 2 classification –Anti-backsliding measures 1-hr NSR threshold Section 185 fees Contingency measures Conformity in 1-hr areas EPA has requested rehearing or clarification, but the court has not indicated whether or not this request will be granted

17. Challenges Attainment Deadlines are short for moderate areas where the plan needs to show attainment by 2009; TCEQ has not been able to demonstrate this for HGB area Federal Mobile Source Reduction Benefits are not fully achieved until ~2020 Reclassification decisions – hard choices Current litigation adds a great deal of regulatory uncertainty

18. How Does this Affect Transportation Planning? Title 23 USC Section 134(a)(1) It is in the national interest to encourage and promote the safe and efficient management, operation and development of surface transportation systems that will serve the mobility needs of people and freight and foster economic growth and development within and through urbanized areas, while minimizing transportation-related fuel consumption and air pollution.

19. Transportation Planning Factors 1.Support economic vitality 2.Increase safety and security 3.Increase accessibility & mobility options 4.Protect environment & improve quality of life 5.Enhance system integration & connectivity 6.Promote efficient system management and operation 7.Emphasize system preservation

20. Transportation Conformity: Keeping the Process Connected

21. Questions or Comments Please contact your EPA Regional Office Peggy Wade: Texas (except El Paso), Oklahoma, Louisiana wade.peggy@epa.gov 214-665-7247 Jeff Riley: El Paso, Arkansas, New Mexico Riley.jeffrey@epa.gov 214-665-8542