1. Status of MDI+BDS Cost Estimate Lau Gatignon

2. Summary ItemkCHFComments 4 QD0 magnets1340But replaceable item! IP feedback system610Preliminary Pre-alignment system (BDS+MDI)15500 Stabilization750 Pre-isolation (2 systems)500CE uncertainties significant Post-collision line magnets12200 Post-collision line vacuum3200 2 Main beam dumps> 50000 ?Real work yet ?to be started Decommissioning to be added? 2 Tune-up beam dumps, if needed> 50000 ?See above BDS magnets?Last on the list BDS vacuum? BDS collimators, instrumentation, …? Total so far34100Excl. dump and missing items This is a first report. Your feedback is essential! Thank you!

3. QD0 magnets PBS Item 4.2.2.5 (QD0⁺/QD0⁻) Item (needed per magnet)CostComments Permendur sectors (27)33 kCHF100 mm each; manuf. by electro-erosion PM blocks (108)137 kCHF2 single-block (with different magnetization direction) glued per each PM block “C” beams (2)30 kCHF“C” precision: 20 μm on the 2.7 m Coils (4 + 1 spare)100 kCHF Lateral plates (2) + Ancillary (coils supports) + Assembly 25 kCHFPlates precision: 20 μm on the 2.7 m Ancillary (control/safety + cabling)10 kCHF Total /magnet335 kCHF Total (4 magnets)1340 kCHF M.Modena

4. IP feedback system ItemCost [kCHF] 2 Kickers200 2 BPMs100 2 Amplifiers100 2 BPM processors40 2 Feedback boards40 Cables10 External power, control, monitoring 120 Total610 P.Burrows

5. Pre-alignment system MDI ItemCost [kCHF] Pre-alignment system Cam-movers, WPS, inclinometer, stretching device, etc 820 Monitoring of QD0 15 Rasnik systems, cabling, DAQ 100 Link left/right Open WPS sensors, hydraulic networks, HLS sensors, cabling, etc 375 Total1300 Note: coherent with LHC (4.5 MCHF for 4 experiments) H.Mainaud

6. Pre-alignment system BDS ItemCost [kCHF] Geodesy Reference networks 363 Prealignment CAM movers, sensors (WPS, HLS, inclinometer), metrological plates, Installation and pre-positioning, etc 13770 As built measurements Including analysis and modeling 25 Total14200 CAM movers: same as in main linac WPS: not same as for main linac (optical sensors with learning curve factor), but prototype cost divided by 3 (for the moment). Note: H.Mainaud

7. Stabilisation Preliminary estimates from A.Jeremie exist (for 2 QD0): ItemkEuroComments Foot/support2Elastomere included Actuators (piezos + electronics)53Incl. electronics Absolute sensors84 Capacitive sensors120 Tilt-meter3.4Optional DAQ + Computer15 Pulse (.e. DAQ cost)80 Filter160 Total550Preliminary! A.Jeremie

8. A very rough cost estimate of the pre-isolator:  two 110 tons masses,  20 air-springs,  leveling system  position controls,  ~ 500 kCHf. But large uncertainties on civil engineering costs This does not includes R&D and prototypes.

9. Post-collision line magnets E.Gschwendtner, M.Modena

10. Post-collision line vacuum for one side, thus (30% less for 2 nd one) 3.2 MCHF E.Gschwendtner, R.Veness

11. Main beam dumps No estimate has been made yet. But work starting in EN/STI group But an old ILC estimate (R.Appleby, GDE @ Bangalore, 2006) raises some questions

13. Not yet studied:  BDS&MDI magnets, rectifiers and their various services  BDS collimators, optional muon sweepers  MDI vacuum  Support structures for QD0  Push-pull platforms + infrastructure  ….. Independent estimates to come from other groups:  Civil engineering and services (form CE working group)  Detectors (from PH-LCD)  ….

14. Some questions and remarks:  One is very happy that we have made good progress in the cost estimates, even though we are not yet at the end.  For the moment spares, CERN manpower, operational and R&D costs must not be included. However, tooling for installation must be.  Steiner Stapnes will want to discuss with some of us how to make sure that all is correctly counted, but not twice, in particular also concerning the detectors  The CES working group should do the costing for the cavern and services, but we shall montor that everything is included.  Elimination cost must be calculated in cases where it is important (dumps!), but will most likely not be quoted at the CDR stage  We must make progress with the estimates for the BDS  Philippe Lebrun and the management will see how the cost estimates for the beam dumps can be speeded up  The number of magnets for the post collision lines slide is not consistent with the final conclusion. Should they be made super conducting to reduce power consumption?

15. Next steps:  Regular follow-up of progress in Cost and Schedule Working Group meetings  Internal Review of the overall CLIC Cost Estimates on 9 th of December  External Cost Review Committee on 5 and 6 April 2011

16. Internal Review of CLIC CDR Value Estimate Guidelines for contents of presentations Presentations are made by PBS domain/subdomain coordinators, i.e. they follow the PBS description of the project Only material costs will be addressed for the time being Each presentation will be 20 min + 10 min questions Each presentation should contain – Brief description of the PBS domain/subdomain – PBS level(s) at which the elementary costs were input – Value estimate methodology: analytical/scaling Scaling variables and laws Possible application of learning curves (learning coefficients) Consistency with general schedule – Justification of elementary/unit costs, references, benchmarking Publications Earlier projects (CERN or elsewhere) Industrial cost studies When applicable, consistency check with ILC RDR – Summary tables of material value at 3 TeV and 500 GeV Installation through industrial contracts is part of material cost – Uncertainties: technical, commercial – Potential for further cost reduction/mitigation To be discussed