Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SPRAWL IN THE HEARTLAND –A Case Study of the Kansas City Missouri/Kansas Metropolitan Component Economic Area.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SPRAWL IN THE HEARTLAND –A Case Study of the Kansas City Missouri/Kansas Metropolitan Component Economic Area."— Presentation transcript:

1 SPRAWL IN THE HEARTLAND –A Case Study of the Kansas City Missouri/Kansas Metropolitan Component Economic Area

2 UBIQUITOUS NATURE Sprawl - technically defined as "low- density, automobile-dependent development beyond the edge of service and employment areas" - is ubiquitous and its effects are impacting the quality of life in every region of America, in our large cities and small towns. –Sierra Club

3 Imagery Of Sprawl

4

5 THE BASIC AREA 29th Largest Urban Area - 25th Largest SMA MA Ranks 134th of 273 in Growth Rate 80 Percent Of All Workers Drive Alone To Work Total Land Area Spreads 10 x Fastest Than Population It Has The 5th Greatest Rate of U.S. Sprawl Among Metropolitan Areas 150 Sq. Miles of Undeveloped Land in KC Alone

6 LIMITS OF SPRAWL IN 1999

7 CURRENT POPULATION MA Rate of Growth 1990 – 2000 = 6.8 percent CEA Rate 1990 – 2000 = 14.7 percent MA Population Gain 1990 – 2000 = 198,000

8 URBAN CORE GROWTH Pop = 441,259 @ 0.2 percent/year Pop = 142654 @ -2.0 percent/year Missouri Portion Kansas Portion

9 COMPONENT ECONOMIC AREA 2 States 413 Local Municipal Government Units 14 Counties 218 Townships 790+ Special Governmental Units 103 School Districts And, ranked first in miles of road/per capita for the largest 50 MA’s

10 URBAN FRINGE – BLDG PERMITS - 1997 Residential Building Permits – MA Core Area 2,300 Residential Building Permits – Fringe Area (10 Counties) 7,300

11 BASIC FACTS – MA & CEA Rate of spread 1985 – 1999 –Metro Area = 56 % –CEA = 70 % –Population MA = 1.9 Million - rate = 6.8% –Population CEA = 2.274 Million - rate = 8.2% –CEA Area = 42 x 52 miles (2,184 sq. miles)

12 EXAMPLE PLATTE COUNTY 1950 - 14,973 1960 - 23,350 1970 - 32,081 1980 - 46,341 1990 - 57,867 1999 - 70,068 195019601970198019901999 0 20 40 60 80 Thousands

13 THE FUEL - PEOPLE “Where Do These People Come From” - Planner, Platte Co. MO Another State………………. 53 percent Same State. ……………….. 40 percent Outside USA………………. 7 percent

14 RATE OF MIGRATION

15 ELEMENTS OF SPRAWL Annexation Airport Interstate Highways Rural Water/Sewer Districts Schools Edge City

16 Annexation 1964 KC Doubles Size Annexes 122 sq. miles of new land; this includes the area around 16 free- standing suburbs and small towns

17 THE KCI AIRPORT

18 AIPORT DYNAMICS 20 Miles From Center City 12,000 Acre Preservation Zone Shifts Focus of Activity to the Northland Boosts Growth Opportunity to the Fringe Creates Large-Lot Zoning Schemes

19 INTERSTATE SYSTEM Interstate 435 Creates A Looped Link To Form the Anchor For Two Major Interstate Systems –I-70 and I-35 and Reliever Rd. on 10 and 50

20 INFRASTRUCTURE - WATER During The Late 1960s, To Induce Growth In The Northland, KC Applies 200 Million In EPA Funds To Bring Water Service From The Core Area Within 10 Years 18 Separate Rural Water District Are In Operation To Service Growth Attracted to the North and West

21 SPRAWL ENGINE - WATER Rural water district #4 Increases its water service capacity by 800 percent to service fringe growth

22 INFRASTRUCTURE - SEWER By 1980 Aggressive Sewer Extensions From Growing Suburbs Absence Of Growth Management Plans Encourages Sewer Extensions Beyond The I-435 Corridor Remote Subdivisions Allowed with Packaged Sewer Plants

23 THE PUSH - SCHOOLS The KC Southland Schools Have Been Under Fire For More Than 15 Years “More Young Couples Are Pushed Out of KC Each Year By The Threat of Children In School Than All The Other Factors Combined” –KC Missouri Planner

24 EDGECITIES – THE ANCHORS Heartland Sprawl Is Built Around Two Developing Edge Cities, And A Third In Process Both Edges Are the Fastest Growing Areas in The Central Midwest Johnson County - Cities Form The Quintessential “Urban Core Flight” Suburban Complex

25 EDGE CITIES – AGGRESIVE SPRAWL

26 PLANNER’S ASSESSMENT The Pull –Multi-State, Overlapping, Uncoordinated Area –Schools –Shocking Misuse of Zoning and Subdivision Powers in Regional Communities –Aggressive Annexation and Utility Extension –Airport

27 ASSESSMENT – THE PUSH Lack Of Variety of Housing Types, Packages, and Plans In The Old MA Rapidly Rising Land Costs In The MA Schools Paradoxically, Tighter – Restrictive Land Use Schemes And Density Developments

28 THE COUNTRYSIDE - COLLISON One Planner – 515 Res. Building Permits Five Acre Minimum Lots and Climbing Growth Rates Create Many Problems For the Farming Community – But It Does Not Kill Them – Platte County Keeping Up With Sprawl – You Cannot Kick Back For a Minute And Take A Breath

29 COUNTRYSIDE - ASSESSMENT No Chance To Be Proactive Consultants Are Fine – But They Are Not In The Trenches Code Enforcement – What A Joke! “Planning Life At The Fringe – You Go From Floodplains to Hogs, From Conspicuous Consumption to Mobile Homes, And Then Return To Hear WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO PAVE MY ROAD?

30 PLANNER’S CONCLUSION “Endless Interstates, Suburban Economic Opportunity, Cheap Land, Water, Sewer – These Are the Necessary Conditions For Sprawl. But They Are Not the Sufficient Conditions. To Complete The Picture You Must Have Attitude, Mistrust, Self-serving Gain, Cheap Money, And A Callous Disregard for the City That Made Sprawl Possible” ……………KC Planner of 30 Years………………..

31 ATTITUDE Do You Favor Greenbelts Or Urban Growth Boundaries To Contain Sprawl? 57% Favor…………..33% Oppose Would You Use Public Money To Acquire Land To Keep It Open? 44% Favor…………..49% Oppose Which is More Important – Do What You Want With Your Land – 69% Let Government Regulate Land Use – 25% Time/CNN Poll – January 20/21, 1999

32 THE COST OF SPRAWL The haphazard and arbitrary scattering of structures across the landscape devastates rural areas in many ways: it homogenizes the countryside once dotted by forests, fields, farmland, and rivers, lakes and ponds; it destroys the agricultural heritage of this country; it upsets small-town life; and it changes the economic and cultural character of these areas. Between 1970 and 1990, almost 20 million acres of rural land were developed nationwide. A total of 400,000 acres a year are chewed up to build residential and commercial centers……………….Sierra Club


Download ppt "SPRAWL IN THE HEARTLAND –A Case Study of the Kansas City Missouri/Kansas Metropolitan Component Economic Area."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google