1. PIA 3395 Development studies

2. Week Thirteen Governance Theories Decentralized Governance, NGOs and Civil Society

3. Government: Two Definitions Who Gets What, When, Where and How ◦ Harold D. Lasswell 1902-1978 The Authoritative Allocation of Values ◦ David Easton 1917-2014

4. Systems Theory: The basis of discussion of governance

5. Overview-1: The Importance of Governance for Policy and Management Basic Theme: Governance and Development Development management theorists and practitioners need to be careful that their formulas for social and economic change so as not to do more harm than good. Key: Balances

6. Overview-2 The Need for Balance A balance exists between the extremes of the command economy and centralized planning on the one hand and the libertarian approach advocated by radical public choice theorists on the other. Throughout, it is not possible to divorce development issues from issues of governance and civil society. Nor can the debate and selection of policy choices be detached from the capacity of institutions to implement policy.

7. C ommand vs. Libertarianism: The Need for Balance

9. The State The state as an analytical concept refers to an idea or set of ideas as to how government relates to society; The state system, by the nineteenth century, had acquired its modern form (in Europe) as a steering mechanism over societal forces and an institutional apparatus with human and structural characteristics; Four Concepts: State, Nation, Governance, Government

10. Basic Terms: Mini-Discussion 1. Nation 2. State 3. Governance 4. Government

11. More Basic Terms 5. Politics 6. Political Science 7. Local Government 8. Civil Society 9. Democracy

12. Decentralized Governance Historical Patterns of Control: AT ISSUE is the Location of ultimate power Definition of Power: the authoritative allocation of values David Easton

13. Treaty of Westphalia, 1648 1. End of Thirty Years War 2. Recognized the sovereign independence of signatories 3. Created International System

15. The State The contemporary capitalist state makes and influences investment decisions and it is often the mission of the state to sustain conditions in its economic management and coordination conducive to investment; It does so, while simultaneously pursuing revenue-consuming distribution policies indispensable to its legitimacy. And addressing demands for staying out of private sector social and economic activity.

16. The Institutional State-1 The institutional state can be defined as the set of structures and processes; including the public service, the nature of social relationships, networks and internal (formal and informal) organizational dynamics; which—though it evolves over time—is a permanent part of the dynamics of government.

17. The Institutional State-2 Formal institutions are organizationally based units which have effective authority over aspects of policy and implementation and are based on formal rules, common values, and standard modes of behavior and regulations that are widely accepted For the state to serve society, the bureaucracy must see themselves as parts of the institutional system.

18. Instability and Political Risk

19. Rule of Law

20. Fundamental Issue TYPES OF INTER- GOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

21. Confederation and loose confederal relationships Confederation and loose confederal relationships Power lies with the sub-units U.S. Articles of Confederation European Union Mercesor ASEAN Southern African Development Council (SADC) Economic Council of West African States (ECOWAS)

22. Articles of Confederation

23. Federal Relationship Some power lies with the National Unit Some power lies with lower units Federalism Can transfer additional authority back to the sub-units but not take power away from the federated governments

24. Federal Relationship Two This is the key Distinction: 1. Lower units cannot break away from the National Unit 2. National Unit cannot take power away from the lower units

25. Layer Cake vs. Marble Cake Iraq?

26. Federal Relationships Three Examples: USA Mexico Canada Germany - Federal Republic Nigeria Brazil India Russian Federation Austria Switzerland

27. Unitary Systems All power ultimately lies at the national level What power the local level has, is given to it by the national level The power that the national unit has given to the local level can also be taken away from it

29. Unitary Systems Two Examples: United Kingdom France Denmark Costa Rica Thailand Kenya Ivory Coast South Africa? (Unitary or Quasi- Federal) Hungary

30. Decentralization Forms of Decentralization Concept: Transfer of authority to a lower level of government Primary Unit of Government: Lowest level that carries a bureaucracy with it Subsidiarity- Transfer authority to the lowest level of government that can handle it (European Union)

31. “Subsidiarity” in Health Care

32. Devolution:Transfer to a non- Federal political body e.g. Budget and personnel authority to district, city and town councils (some times referred to as fiscal and administrative decentralization but really forms of devolution). Key- political power lies with lower level politicians Lower levels have capacity to determine and implement their decisions

33. Proposed Devolution in U.K.

34. Deconcentration Transfer of authority to administrators at lower level within the administrative system Functional Integrated Prefectoral Unintegrated Prefectoral

35. Control Systems Home AffairsLocal Govt. Council Labor District Labor Office Education District Ed. Office Agriculture District Ag. Office Public Works Office Functional

36. InteriorLocal Govt.Public WorksAgricultureEducationLabor Council/Chief Prefectoral – Integrated: The Hourglass District Office District Labor Office District Ed. Office District Ag. Office Public Works Office

37. Local Govt. Council/ Chief Prefectoral - Unintegrated Police InteriorLabor District Labor Office Education District Ed. Office Agriculture District Ag. Office Public Works Office District Office

38. Colonial District Commissioner

39. Other Forms Delegation - Public Corporations or parastatals (AMTRAK) Privatization Program and Project Decentralization

41. Sectoral - By regular line or agency within a Ministry E.g. Focused activity - seed production (Green Revolution) Agricultural experiments Education- No Child Left Behind

42. Use of Special Units Deconcentration or Transfer of authority to central level special unit E.g. Water, health or education projects or activities to subordinate admini- strative or council structures PAT Buses Board of Education

43. PAT of Pittsburgh (Allegheny County)

44. Inter-Ministerial/Departmental Committees or Units Sometimes called “Whole of Government” Approach Obama’s Use of Task Forces Planning supervision Overlapping committee memberships, e.g. Land Use Planning Committees

45. Whole of Government Approach

46. Field Level Units Creation of field level Special Project Units with semi-autonomous status E.g.A Range management project; or Integrated Rural Development - Most well known type of special project Special designated geographical areas Multitude of project activity in different sectors that may overlap or compliment.

47. Extension Services

48. Governance and Civil Society: A Review Networks of organizations, groups and individuals pursuing socio- economic interests

49. Various Definitions "Beyond the family but short of the state" (Hegel) "Human Rights, Basic Needs and the Stuff of Citizenship" (Anonymous) Issue- (First vs. Second and Third generation Human Rights and Civil Society)

50. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel August 27, 1770 – November 14, 1831)

51. Types of Organizations The Nature of the Beast: Non-Profits Not for Profits PVOs CBOs CSOs Civics (South Africa) Foundations Associations Interest Groups Quangos

52. United Democratic Front

53. Five Caveats 1. Usually excludes “for profits”- issue of contractors 2. Both International and Local 3. Internationals are not universally loved 4. Very often internationals are religious or charity based 5. Focus has been primarily on relief than development or civil society goals

54. Types of “Development” NGOs 1. Philanthropy 2. Relief and Welfare Societies 3. Public Service Contractors 4. Populist based development agencies (national) 5. Grassroots associations (local or village based) 6. Advocacy groups 7. Public Service Contractors

55. Giving Fish or Teaching Fishing

56. Traditional Focus Disaster- Humanitarian Assistance War, Drought, Agricultural Failure Focus on Rural Areas Some Have partly shifted to Developments

57. “Herbert Hoover's food relief efforts during World War I saved between 15 and 20 million European children”

58. NGOs- Areas of perceived advantage NGOs- Areas of perceived advantage 1. Links with poor 2. Image of populism 3. Cost-effective- small but efficient 4. Innovative 5. Staff loyalty and commitment

60. International Humanitarian NGOs- Weaknesses 1. Lack of local legitimacy 2. Donor driven 3. Inefficiency 4. Amateurism- leadership and continuity problems 5. Staffing problems 6. Self-serving- own objectives: Faith Based 7. Fixation on projects- problems of replication 8. Lack of perceived accountability 9. Learning problems/lack of institutional memory 10.Tensions with government institutions- Politically threatening 11. Ties with existing local elites 12. Inability of humanitarian organizations to transfer to new development orientation

61. NGOs, Local Government, Civil Society and Democracy: A Review NGOs, Local Government, Civil Society and Democracy: A Review 1. Madison and Democracy: a. The problem with majorities b. Tyranny c. Factions

62. 2. Direct Democracy vs. Representative Democracy a. Populism b. Minority rights c. Shifting majorities d. Problem with Plebiscites

63. 3. Polyarchy Needs a. Interest Group Liberalism b. Problem of zero-sum game c. Civil Society as organizational not individual or the mass d. The need for apathy e. Institutional structures: Checks and balances f. Constitutional vs. social stability

64. Where do we go from here?

65. 4. Democracy focuses on: a. Governance b. Local Government c. Civil Society Unpaid Non-Political Advertisement: PIA 2528- GOVERNANCE, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND CIVIL SOCIETY IN ASIA, LATIN AMERICA, EASTERN EUROPE AND AFRICA