1. 1 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission John M. Wood, Acting Director Division of Pipeline Certificates Office of Energy Projects FERC Update Florida Energy Pipeline Association Summer Symposium Thursday, August 13, 2015

2. 2 Overview  Shale Gas  LNG Export Terminals  Florida

3. 3 Shale Plays  Major Shale Plays  Barnett (TX)  Fayetteville/Haynesville (AR, LA, TX)  Bakken (ND)  Eagle Ford (TX)  Permian (TX)  Marcellus/Utica (PA, NY, WV, OH)

4. 4 Early Shale Development  Barnett and Haynesville/Fayetteville  Large diameter, high pressure “bullet” interstate pipelines from the play to interstate hubs  Relatively Non-Controversial

5. 5 Bakken, Eagle Ford, Permian  Bakken  Remote from the existing grid, few interstate pipelines  Non-controversial  Eagle Ford and Permian  Robust existing interstate and intrastate pipeline infrastructure  Exports to Mexico  Eagle Ford relatively close to proposed and authorized LNG export terminals  Relatively non-controversial, some exceptions

6. 6 Marcellus and Utica  Marcellus and Utica  Robust existing interstate infrastructure  Initially smaller projects to enhance existing infrastructure  Re-plumb the system, flow reversals  Larger projects  Highly controversial, near population centers

7. 7 LNG Export Terminals  Oops we really didn’t need all of those import terminals, but they might work as export terminals  Convert existing import terminals to export terminals and construct new greenfield export terminals  Five export facilities authorized (Sabine, Cameron, Cove Point, Freeport, Corpus Christi)  Enhance connecting pipeline systems  Small scale LNG and CNG exports

8. 8 Issues  Environmental issues  Landowner concerns  Construction impacts in more populated areas  Eminent domain  Multiple interstate, intrastate, and gathering pipelines  Segmentation/Cumulative Impacts  “Fracking”, Climate Change, Anti-Fossil Fuels

9. Non-environmental Issues  Rates and Terms and Conditions  Impacts on existing customers  Gas Quality and Interchangeability 9

10. Florida Infrastructure 10

11. 11 Florida – Existing Infrastructure  Existing Interstate Pipelines  Florida Gas Transmission  Gulfstream  Southern Natural Gas

12. 12 Florida - Recently Approved  Recently Approved  Floridian, CP13-541  Interstate LNG facility  Phase 1, 1 Bcf of storage, 100 MMcf/d sendout  Phase 2, 4 Bcf of storage, 400 MMcf/d sendout

13. 13 Florida - Pending  Proposed  Sabal Trail Transmission, CP15-17  474 mile system from Transco to Gulfstream, FGT and Florida Southeast Connection  Three phase construction, 1,075,000 Dth/d  Florida Southeast Connection, CP14-554  126 mile system from Sabal Trail to Martin County  640,000 Dth per day  FGT, Jacksonville Expansion Project CP15-144  Pipeline and compression to provide service to Peoples

14. 14 Florida – Pre-Filing  Eagle LNG Partners Jacksonville, PF15-7  LNG export terminal  Three liquefaction trains 0.55 Mmtpa  1or 2 storage tanks  Serve small and mid-size vessels  Serve bunkering barges for fuel in Jacksonville Harbor  Truck loading

15. 15 Florida - Issues  Environmental  Siting  Landowner conflicts  Eminent domain  “Fracking”, climate change, Anti-fossil fuels

16. Questions? 16