1. PRESENTATION ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE “NEW GENERATION” CORRECTIONAL FACILITY PROTOTYPES Department of Correctional Services 17 September 2002

2. 1. THE OBJECTIVES 1.1. STRATEGIC PLAN 1.2. OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVES 1.3. BUDGETARY OBJECTIVES

3. INTRODUCTION *The concepts utilized in the development of the “New Generation” prototype correctional facility have included: Unit Management Direct Supervision Communal Cells *The prototypes as developed were guided by the need to enhance the facility’s potential for rehabilitation while maintaining a high level of security by design

4. *The concept as developed incorporate all the recognized standard for humane incarceration. *The designs reflect detailed space norms and standards incorporating recognized standards and local conditions *The design concepts have been developed: (a)To achieve low Life-Cycle-Costing (b)To permit a variety of procurement methods (c)To permit rapid & expeditious construction (d) To maintain a high level of security by design

5. 1.THE OBJECTIVES 1.1 STRATEGIC PLAN 1.1.1. Reduction of overcrowding 1.1.2. Introduction of Unit Management 1.1.3. Reduction of Life- Cycle- Costs 1.1.4. Enhancement of Rehabilitation Programmes

6. 1.THE OBJECTIVES 1.2 OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVES 1.2.1. Development of Life-Cycle-Costing procedures 1.2.2. Revised Business & Procurement process which reduce risks but enhance competition 1.2.3. Revised criteria for prioritization of projects 1.2.4. Revised criteria for creation of new facilities maintaining a high level of security by design 1.2.5. Development of Master Plan for new & renovated facilities

7. 1.THE OBJECTIVES 1.3BUDGETARY OBJECTIVES 1.3.1. Reduction of Capital Costs 1.3.2. Reduction of Operating & Maintenance Costs 1.3.3. Modifications to MTEF Cycle Budget to reflect strategic objectives 1.3.4 Implementation of Life-Cycle-Costing methodology to achieve all of the above and reduce risk associated with construction

8. 2. THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS 2.1. DEVELOPMENT OF PROTOTYPE DESIGN 2.2. UTILIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

9. 2.THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS 2.1. KEY FEATURES OF THE THE PROTOTYPE DESIGN 2.1.1. Standard designs with fee and construction cost savings through repetition. 2.1.2. Establishing integrated and co- operative relationship with the Department of Public Works. 2.1.3. Permitting the introduction of Construction Management to allow for options other than conventional construction methodologies while reducing risk

10. 2.THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS 2.2 UTILISATION OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 2.2.1. Encouraging the participation by a wide variety of construction providers 2.2.2. Permitting the utilisation of prisoner labour and products 2.2.3. Significantly increase the purchasing power of current budget allocations 2.2.4 Reducing the cost & time risks associated with construction

11. 3.THE PRODUCT 3.1.Design Philosophy 3.2.Design Layouts 3.3.Costing and Estimating 3.4.Partnership with the Department of Public Works

12. 3.THE PRODUCT 3.1.6. Support rehabilitation 3.1.7. “Appropriate Technology” 3.1.8. Potential for phased construction & additions with minimum operational disturbances 3.1.9 “World Class” design quality 3.1.10 High level of security by design

13. 3.THE PRODUCT 3.1 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY 3.1.1. Unit Management, “New Generation” 3.1.2. Direct Supervision 3.1.3. Communal Cell 3.1.4. “Kit-o-Parts” concept 3.1.5. Low-Life-Cycle cost

14. 3.THE PRODUCT 3.2PROTOTYPE DESIGN 3.2.1. The development of norms and standards 1. 3.2.2. The development of:

15. The Communal Cell

16. The Unit Management Module

17. The Unit Management Cluster

18. The Zone

19. The Typical 3000 Bed Prototype

20. “The Street”

21. The “Street” and Functional Core

22. The Potential for Phased Development

23. The Potential for Multiple Facilities Sharing a Common Site

24. Overall View of a Typical Prototype Design

25. Perspective of Typical Dayroom at Housing Module

26. 3.2.3. The potential for phased development 3.2.4. The potential for multiple facilities sharing a common site 3.2.5. The overall view of a typical prototype design 3.2.6. Perspective of a typical communal cell 3.2.7. Perspective of typical dayroom at housing module

27. 3.THE PRODUCT 3.3COSTING AND ESTIMATING 3.3.1. Estimated project construction cost per prisoner is 1/3 cost of recent facilities. 3.3.2. Controlling construction cost through joint efforts with CSIR security & building systems groups to ensure the use of “Appropriate” technology

28. 3.3.2. Comparison with new facility of comparable level of service BLOEMFONTEINNIGELPROTOTYPE 3000 beds850 beds3000 beds Single and double beds8 & 10 Communal cells10 beds communal cell Housing area (m²) Support area (m²) Total area (m²) Cost of Project Cost of square meter Cost per prisoner 63, 990 m² 16, 323 m² 80, 313 m² R 334, 466, 000.00 R 4,127.00 R 110, 488.00 * 24 450 m² (1) R 102, 070, 354.00 R 4,174. 66 R 120, 082. 77 * Estimate 75/25% of 1 15, 000 m² 30, 000 m² R 150, 000, 000.00 R 5,000.00 R 50, 000.00

29. 3.THE PRODUCT 3.4PARTNERSHIP WITH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 3.4.1. Establishment of interdepartmental Task Team noting Roles and obligations Service Level Agreement Process Management Performance Evaluations

30. 3.THE PRODUCT 3.4.2. Status update of work accomplished to date by Task Team: Site selection is substantially complete at four locations, Leeukop, Nigel, Tzaneen & Klerksdorp Appointment of professionals will be completed around 25 September 2002 Three of the projects will be ready for construction by January 2003 with Tzaneen starting about a month sooner