Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byFrancine Snow Modified over 9 years ago
1
The Norwood Public Schools 2014 Accountability Overview and MCAS Results Dr. Alexander Wyeth Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment
2
School Accountability Level Reason(s) 201220132014201220132014 Norwood High School 121 Met all gap narrowing targets. Met all gap narrowing targets, but low Students w/Disabilities participation (94%). Met all gap narrowing targets. Coakley Middle School 222 Did not meet gap narrowing target: High Needs/Students w/Disabilities (1 pt). Did not meet gap narrowing targets: All and High Needs. Did not meet gap narrowing target: High Needs/Students w/Disabilities, and low ELL participation (91%). Balch Elementary 222 Did not meet gap narrowing targets: All and High Needs. Callahan Elementary 112 Met all gap narrowing targets. Did not meet gap narrowing target: High Needs (2 pts). Cleveland Elementary 212 Did not meet gap narrowing target: High Needs (1 pt). Met all gap narrowing targets. Did not meet gap narrowing targets: All and High Needs. Oldham Elementary 112 Met all gap narrowing targets. Did not meet gap narrowing target: High Needs/Low Income (3 pts). Prescott Elementary 112 Met all gap narrowing targets. Did not meet gap narrowing targets: All and High Needs. % MA schools at Level 1 32%31%26% 5% fewer in Level 1 % MA schools at Level 2 47%48%53% 5% more in Level 2 # of MA public schools with MCAS 1607 Norwood Public Schools Accountability Ratings State Expectation: to narrow all proficiency gaps for all groups by 50% from 2012-2017
3
English Language Arts
5
Grade 4 ELA Proficiency RatesGrowth Rates
6
Grade 5 ELA Proficiency Rates Growth Rates
7
Grade 6 ELA Proficiency Rates Growth Rates
8
Grade 7 ELA Proficiency Rates Growth Rates
9
Grade 8 ELA Proficiency Rates Growth Rates
10
Grade 10 ELA Proficiency Rates Growth Rates
11
6/7 schools improved their composition (writing promp) scores. 1 school’s writing results declined a bit but still had a high level of performance.
16
Mathematics
18
Grade 4 Math Proficiency RatesGrowth Rates
19
Grade 5 Math Proficiency Rates Growth Rates
20
Grade 6 Math Proficiency RatesGrowth Rates
21
Grade 7 Math Proficiency RatesGrowth Rates
22
Grade 8 Math Proficiency Rates Growth Rates
23
Grade 10 Math Proficiency RatesGrowth Rates
24
Science and Technology Engineering
27
High School Science & Technology Grade 9/10 Biology Proficiency Rates Grade 9/10 Science & Technology Proficiency Rates
28
NHS Recipients of John & Abigail Adams Scholarships (students who scored Advanced on one or more MCAS tests) 76: 28% of Class of 2013 70: 29% of Class of 2014 79: 29% of Class of 2015
29
Non-High Needs vs. High Needs % Proficiency & SGP
30
80% or more of Norwood’s Non-High Needs students were proficient on 10 of the 17 MCAS tests (59%). The proficiency gaps between Norwood’s High Needs students and those who are Not High Needs range from 12 points in grade 10 ELA to 44 points in grade 5 ELA with an mean gap of 31 points and median of 34 points. These are the gaps we need to cut in half by 2017 On average, our High Needs students do one third as well as our Non-High Needs students.
31
Both High and Non-High Needs students showed high growth in the same two test areas: Gr 8 ELA and Gr 8 Math. High Needs students showed low growth in four areas: Gr 5 ELA, and Gr 5, 6, & 7 math. Non-High Needs students showed low growth in only one area: Gr 5 Math.
33
Non-Disabled
35
Disabled
36
Key Areas for Improvement 1.Grade 3 ELA 2.Grade 5 ELA 3.Grade 6 ELA 4.Grade 3-5 Math: In process of selecting new math program. 5.Grade 6-7 Math: In process of selecting new textbooks. 6.Grade 8 Science and Technology Engineering: In process of adopting new standards.
37
Reminder: MCAS is only one measure of a student’s, teacher’s, school’s, and district’s success! There is more to a good education than MCAS…or PARCC
38
Some Other Points of Interest Massachusetts’ students are #1 in the nation at grades 4 and 8 in reading and math on 2013 NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) tests. Massachusetts’ students ranked #2 in science, and were tied for #5 (with Japan) in math on the 2011 TIMSS (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study) tests. Bottom line: MCAS tests are the most rigorous in the nation and among other nations.
39
For more information go to http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/ For sample Writing Prompts (WP), Open Responses (OR), and Short Answer (SA) questions. http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/ For MCAS, AYP, and Other District/School Data. http://www.doe.mass.edu/apa/dart/ For comparative district data.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.