Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

John Arthur LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 1 From construction project to operating facility Structure.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "John Arthur LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 1 From construction project to operating facility Structure."— Presentation transcript:

1 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 1 From construction project to operating facility Structure of the LCLS facility organization Operations and the experiment program Transition to Operations John Arthur LCLS

2 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 2 Steps in turning on the LCLS Timeline Accelerator commissioning X-ray commissioning

3 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 3 LCLS Installation and Commissioning LTU/Und/Dump Install LTU/UndComm. Re-commission Inj/BC2 to SL2 First Light in FEE PEP-II run ends FEE/NEH Install PPS Cert. LTU/Dump FEH Install CD-4 (7/31/2010) X-Rays in NEH First Light in FEH JJFFMMAAMMJJJJAASSDDJJFFMMAAMMJJJJAASSOONNDDJJFFMMAAMMJJJJ ON A A 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 Down PPS A A M M now Linac/BC2 Commissioning FEEComm. FEH Hutch BO AMO Experiment program begins

4 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 4 Accelerator Commissioning Ground rules for transfer of new accelerator systems from construction to Accelerator Systems Div were defined in Lab Director’s memo, 12/2006 ASD SOP for control of accelerator configuration implemented from start of commissioning Staged handover of new systems Injector + BC-1 Commissioning: April 2007 start, November 2007 finish + Linac through Sector 30 Commissioning: January 2008 start, April 2008 finish + Beam Transport through Undulator and Beam Dump January 2009 start, July 2009 finish

5 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 5 X-Ray Commissioning Front End start commissioning May 2009 Near Hall start commissioning July 2009 Far Hall start commissioning February 2010

6 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 6 Organization LCLS Directorate within SLAC Structure of the LCLS Directorate

7 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 7 SLAC Organization SLAC Director P. Drell Engineering & Technical Support L. Klaisner Operations A. Merola LCLS D. Knutson SSRL J. St ö hr Particle Physics & Astrophysics S. Kahn Photon Science K. Hodgson

8 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 8 LCLS Directorate Organization LCLS Director Dale Knutson Accelerator Systems Div John Seeman Business Div Cindy Lowe Experimental Facilities Div Jochen Schneider Engineering Physics Div David Schultz Strategic Projects Div John Galayda LCLS Construction LUSI

9 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 9 Operations Budgets Staffing plans Operation goals

10 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 10 LCLS Proposed Budget Accelerator Systems FY2009: $ 96.7M(similar to FY08) Experiment Facilities FY2009: $ 2M(new money) FY2010: $ 9M

11 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 11 Accelerator Systems Budget

12 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 12 FY09FY10Long term Instrument scientists14.524 Engineering (laser, mech, elec)2630 Development scientists1.5310 Detectors0.523 Computer applications2512 Technicians1434 Admin1511 Totals929.5124 Photon Operations Staffing (FTE)

13 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 13 Target Running Schedule 2009: AMO, SXR 2010: AMO, SXR, XPP 2011: AMO, SXR, XPP, CXI 2012: AMO, SXR, XPP, CXI, XCS HED? (hours of operation)

14 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 14 LCLS Facility in its Science Context Advisory groups User outreach Access policy

15 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 15 LCLS Science Advisory Committee Roger Falcone UC Berkeley, USA - Chair Massimo Altarelli European XFEL Project Phil BucksbaumStanford University Robert L. ByerStanford University Hans FrauenfelderLANL Wayne HendricksonColumbia University Tetsuya IshikawaRIKEN Spring-8 Center Margaret MurnaneUniversity of Colorado-Boulder Francesco SetteESRF Sunil SinhaUCSD Dietrich von der Linde University of Essen Justin WarkOxford University C. Lewis CockeKansas State University Robert SchoenleinLBNL Philip AnfinrudNIH Geraldine RichmondUniversity of Oregon

16 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 16 LCLS/LUSI Instrument Teams SAC recommended scientific thrust areas, based on letters of intent to do LCLS science (250 signatories) Thrust areas: AMO, XPP, CXI, HED, XCS, SXR Scientists chose team leaders for each area Interface with SLAC Provide input to instrument design process Instrument scientists in regular contact with team leaders Team leaders review and accept instrument physics requirement documents Workshops have brought many team members to SLAC LCLS encourages instrument team presence from start of instrument operation

17 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 17 Instrument Team Leaders (LUSI) XPP (Instrument scientist: David Fritz) K. Gaffney (SLAC, leader) D. Reis (U. of MI) T. Tschentscher (DESY) J. Larsson (Lund Inst Tech) CXI (Instrument scientist: Sebastien Boutet) J. Hajdu (SLAC + Uppsala U, leader) H. Chapman (DESY) J. Miao (UCLA) XCS (Instrument scientist: Aymeric Robert) B. Stephenson (ANL, leader) K. Ludwig (Boston U) G. Grübel, DESY

18 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 18 AMO (Instrument scientist: John Bozek) L. Di Mauro (Ohio State, leader) N. Berrah (Western Michigan U) SXR (Instrument scientist TBD) A. Nilsson (Stanford) W. Wurth (U Hamburg) HED (Instrument scientist TBD) R. Lee (LLNL, leader) P. Heimann (LBNL) Instrument Team Leaders (non-LUSI)

19 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 19 Outreach: Web ( LCLS.slac.stanford.edu )

20 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 20 Information on LCLS instruments

21 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 21 User site (LCLS.slac.stanford.edu/USER/) “Proposals for experiments using the AMO station must be submitted by September 1, 2008.” “During 2010 it is anticipated that the spectral range of the LCLS will be extended to 8 keV. A call for proposals for XPP will be issued in early 2009.”

22 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 22 LCLS Users Organization First met at 2007 LCLS Users Meeting Elected an Executive Committee A. Barty (LLNL) R. Lee (LLNL) L. Young (ANL) First task: create charter Draft in circulation

23 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 23 2008 LCLS/SSRL Users Meeting Oct 15-18, 2008

24 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 24 User Access Policy All instruments are managed by LCLS Every experiment starts with a proposal Beam time allocated primarily on scientific merit Some time reserved for instrumentation proposals Small fraction reserved for Director’s discretion & in-house research Special, limited-time arrangements of preference for LCLS/LUSI instrument team Groups making significant additions of general utility to LCLS can negotiate limited-time preference

25 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 25 Summary LCLS operations organization is taking shape User outreach is progressing well User policy encourages and supports widespread accessibility LCLS is open for business

26 John Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 26 End of Presentation


Download ppt "John Arthur LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 Transition to Operations p. 1 From construction project to operating facility Structure."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google