Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Diabetes Mellitus type II Optimizing Glucose Control Andrea Shaylor Lock Haven University PA Program February 26, 2009.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Diabetes Mellitus type II Optimizing Glucose Control Andrea Shaylor Lock Haven University PA Program February 26, 2009."— Presentation transcript:

1 Diabetes Mellitus type II Optimizing Glucose Control Andrea Shaylor Lock Haven University PA Program February 26, 2009

2 FACTS   Diabetes affects an estimated 24.1 million people -> an increase of more than 3 million in ~2 yrs 6.2 million remain undiagnosed/untreated   Another 57 million with prediabetes/ impaired FPG

3 Pathophysiology   Genetics + Environment Obesity!   defects in glucose uptake ↓ concentration of insulin receptors ↓ glycolytic enzymes glucokinase and hexokinase

4 Pathophysiology *Beta-cell dysfunction and loss vs. insulin resistance*   Chronic exposure to high glucose causes: -glucose-induced toxicity, resulting in irreversible beta-cell damage -generation of reactive oxygen species causing oxidative stress which affects the mRNA for insulin gene expression, resulting in less insulin production   UKPDS: only 50% of pancreatic islet function remains at time of diagnosis

5

6 Diagnosis   ADA offers 3 criteria: 1)* FPG > 126mg/dL on 2 random occasions 2) symptoms of hyperglycemia and a random plasma glucose >200mg/dL 3) 2-hour plasma glucose level >200mg/dL after a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test

7 Current Management Lifestyle modification with diet and exercise ↓ FPG goal not met: monotherapy with metformin or sulfonylurea ↓ Combination of above, or another oral agent ↓ Addition of 3 rd agent, various combinations, or new agent ie incretin mimetic/Byetta or DPP-4 inhibitor/Januvia ↓ When all else fails: Insulin

8

9 Target for treatment   Glycosylated hemoglobin A1C, average blood glucose over past 3 mos, shows better correlation to micro and macrovascular complications than glycemic values   ADA and ACC recommendation: HgbA1C <6.5-7%   UKPDS: for every 1% reduction in A1C: - 21% reduction in death related to diabetes -14% reduction in risk for MI, 12% for stroke -32% reduction in risk for retinopathy -24-27% reduction in risk for nephropathy -30% reduction in risk for neuropathy   Intensive glycemic control associated with a 57% reduction in major CVD outcomes

10

11 Suboptimal Control   Causes irreversible micro and macrovascular complications, m & m   Despite this, 60% of pts do not meet goals   Prospective study of 7000 pts: Avg pt remained at A1C >8% for 5 yrs and >7% for 10 yrs   At time of all OA failure, many pts have had diabetes for 10-15 yrs, and long term complications have already developed Meneghini, L. (2007). Why and How to Use Insulin Therapy Earlier in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes. Southern Medical Association, 100: 164- 173.

12 PICO   Question: In the adult population with DM type II, should insulin be initiated earlier, after failure of just one oral agent, as measured by HbA1C, versus the further addition/combo of OAs, for better glycemic control thereby preventing or delaying the associated DM complications?

13   Retrospective cohort study involving 2501 patients with DM type II above OGLA failure threshold   Found that 24% of patients had insulin delayed for at least 1.8 yrs, and 50% delayed for 5 yrs with polytherapy, even in the presence of diabetes-related complications   A1C levels were closer to 9% before intervention was triggered Rubino, A., McQuay, L., Gought, C., et al. (2007). Delayed initiation of subcutaneous insulin therapy after failure of oral glucose-lowering agents in patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 24: 1412-1418.

14 Evidence for Use   Although oral agents succeed at lowering glucose, there is still a continued loss of B-cell function with time.   Sulfonylureas have been to shown to possibly increase the risk of B-cell apoptosis.   TZDs associated with adverse effects   However, insulin is proven to prevent glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity, in addition to preserving B-cell functioning Tibaldi, J. (2008). Preserving Insulin Secretion in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism : Medscape, 3(2): 147-159.

15 OADReduction in A1C Actos or Avandia.1-.9 Prandin1.1 Metformin1.4 Sulfonylureas1-2 Insulin~2+ Vinik, Aaron. (2007). Advancing Therapy in Type 2 DM with Early, Comprehensive Progression from OA to Insulin Therapy. Clinical Therapeutics, 29: 1236-1253.

16 A1C levels before and after insulin

17 Window of Opportunity   When blood glucose levels are normalized and maintained early, the glucotoxicity and oxidative stress causing B-cell deterioration and apoptosis can be reversed:   Clinical trials of short periods of intensive insulin therapy administered early have resulted in temporary remission due to restored B-cell functioning   However, when same intensive insulin therapy used in pts with avg of 7.6 yrs of DM, insulin response was much less Tibaldi, J. (2008). Preserving Insulin Secretion in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism : Medscape, 3(2): 147-159.

18 ADA/ACE Goals & Algorithm   FPG<100mg/dL and 2hr PPG <140mg/dL   If HbA1C remains >7% following lifestyle changes + metformin after 3 mos-> consider insulin Metformin when combined with insulin has weight-ameliorating effects Vinik, Aaron. (2007). Advancing Therapy in Type 2 DM with Early, Comprehensive Progression from OA to Insulin Therapy. Clinical Therapeutics, 29: 1236-1253.

19 Regimen?   Elevated FPG-- basal   Elevated PPG-- basal/bolus or *premixed PP glycemic control accounts for 50% of overall glycemic control   INITIATE treat-to-target trial: Metformin+ premix BIAsp30: 66% reached <7% Metformin + basal glargine: 40% reached <7%   1-2-3 Trial: Failure on OA, with BIAsp30 added: 41% reached <7%, 21% reached <6.5% in 16 wks Fleury-Milfort, Evelyne. (2007). Practical Strategies to improve treatment of type 2 diabetes. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 20: 295-304.

20   55% of practitioners delay until absolutely necessary due to: ~Fear of hypoglycemia & weight gain ~More complicated and time consuming   PIR: DAWN study: 5000 DM pts, 3000 HCPs- >1/2 pts not using insulin worry about the time to start & >1/2 view the start as personal failure Ligthelm, R., Davidson, J. (2008). Initiating insulin in primary care- The role of modern premixed formulations. Primary Care Diabetes 2: 9-16.   Study published in Diabetes Educator found 50-77% of pts admitted to feelings of failure vs 35% with fear of injections Larkin, M., Capasso, V., Chen, C., et al. (2008). Measuring Psychological Insulin Resistance. The Diabetes Educator, 34: 511-517.

21   Long term benefits outweigh   Newer insulin analogues are safer, simpler, better approximated to physiologic/endogenous insulin secretion, minimal weight gain   Smaller, more user-friendly needles   Diabetes Education!

22 Ultimate Goal for Outcome   Reducing glucose toxicity   Minimizing complications   Preventing m & m by improving CV profile   Limiting healthcare costs   Improving QOL

23 References   Brunton, S., Tenzer-Iglesias, P., Unger, J. (2008). Initiating and intensifying therapy in type 2 Diabetes. The Journal of Family Practice, 57, S17-26.   Fleury-Milfort, Evelyne. (2007). Practical Strategies to improve treatment of type 2 diabetes. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 20: 295-304.   Larkin, M., Capasso, V., Chen, C., et al. (2008). Measuring Psychological Insulin Resistance. The Diabetes Educator, 34: 511-517.   Ligthelm, R., Davidson, J. (2008). Initiating insulin in primary care- The role of modern premixed formulations. Primary Care Diabetes 2: 9-16.   Meneghini, L. (2007). Why and How to Use Insulin Therapy Earlier in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes. Southern Medical Association, 100: 164-173.   Rubino, A., McQuay, L., Gought, C., et al. (2007). Delayed initiation of subcutaneous insulin therapy after failure of oral glucose-lowering agents in patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 24: 1412-1418.   Skyler, J., Bergenstal, R., Bonow, R., et al. (2008). Intensive Glycemic Control and the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 53: 298-304.   Tibaldi, J. (2008). Preserving Insulin Secretion in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism : Medscape, 3(2): 147-159. Vinik, Aaron. (2007). Advancing Therapy in Type 2 DM with Early, Comprehensive Progression from OA to Insulin Therapy. Clinical Therapeutics, 29: 1236-1253.


Download ppt "Diabetes Mellitus type II Optimizing Glucose Control Andrea Shaylor Lock Haven University PA Program February 26, 2009."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google