1. Maturing Digital Object Management Practices at GVSU Julian Jenson

2. Who We Are Max EckardKyle Felker

3. Outline Background Challenges The Visioning Process Preliminary Results Takeaways

4. BACKGROUND

5. Grand Valley State University 4-year, public institution Student population: 24,408 Master’s Large Focus is on teaching State appropriation/FYES – 1988-1989: $4,917 – 2013-2014: $4,776 Photo: Mr. Kjetil Ree. Architect: ?

6. University Libraries Libraries Mission The Grand Valley State University Libraries enrich the educational mission of the university by advancing intellectual growth and discovery. Through the acquisition, application, dissemination and preservation of knowledge we promote teaching, learning and active scholarship.

9. 2005 2008 2012 2013 2014

10. Early Successes Providing new educational opportunities Wider, more open access to our collections Preserving institutional memory Exploring new areas of digital stewardship

11. Things were going pretty well…

12. …until they weren’t.

13. CHALLENGES

14. Challenges Staffing and infrastructure Preservation Definition of scope/role/planning

15. Staffing and Infrastructure Growing, growing, growing Lack of technical infrastructure and human! V Workload issues Focused too much on processing Outreach and education Other value-added services Metadata Knowledge gap

16. Preservation Focused heavily on access No long-term preservation of access No backup of IR content No file format preservation actions No sense of urgency Collection was getting… Bigger and bigger More complex No life-cycle orientation

17. Definition of scope/role/planning Lack of policies and procedures Ad hoc decision-making Lack of day-to-day planning Lack of long-term planning Scope not well-defined No assessment Unaware of faculty needs De-centralized Our role Relationship with other campus stakeholders We were too informal about all of this.

18. Aah!

19. So we created a committee.

20. THE VISIONING PROCESS

21. STRATEGIC PLANNING Strategic Planning

22. Strategic Planning What are we doing? For whom or why are we doing it? What do we want to be doing?

23. Importance to DOM Resource intensive Changes Rapidly Variety of audiences/Types of object

24. Deliberate vs. Emergent Strategy

25. Digital Object Management Committee Digital Initiatives Librarian Archivist Head of Collection Development Liaison Librarian Asst. Dean of Technology Metadata and Digital Curation

26. The Charge Clarify priorities Clarify Role Discuss challenges

27. 27 …without structure Strategy… Credit: Robyn Gallant

28. 28

29. Frameworks for Strategic Planning SWOT Balanced Scorecard Scenario Planning PEST analysis

30. Balanced Scorecard Developed by Business prof. and consultant Maps objectives to specific measurements Metric-heavy Top-Down strategy Result-oriented

31. GVSU Objectives How do disparate areas relate? What are our challenges? Why are they important? How do we address them? Clarity and Communication

32. Our Framework Scholarly & Creative Output Learning Objects Institutional Records Commercial Content Research Data Digital Projects http://digobj.wordpress.com

33. Our Framework Scope Why Audience Challenges

34. 34 Learning Objects

35. Process for creating final document Group challenges into thematic groups Agree on structure Focus on audience Rewrite, rewrite, rewrite

36. PRELIMINARY RESULTS

37. Challenges Staffing and Infrastructure Definition of scope/role/planning Preservation 37

38. Outcomes Hired two new staff More planning for software/hardware (outsourcing) Collection development policies revisions Creation of a comprehensive Preservation Plan Research on data management needs Engage with external stakeholders (campus IT)

39. TAKEAWAYS

40. Takeaways Learn a little about strategic planning/thinking Short term efforts have to be formalized eventually Communication, Communication, Communication Institutional values Technology is not just about technology Storytelling

41. The End Questions?