2. Transit Use at UNC Charlotte: The Potential Impact of the Northeast Corridor Light Rail Transit Line By: Philip Holleran December 6, 2006

3. Outline

5. UNC Charlotte: At a Glance

6. LRT in the University Area?

7. NE Corridor Proposed Alignment

8. Purpose of Study

9. LRT’s Impact on Other Universities

14. Data

16. Method

19. Scenario 1

20. Distribution of Commuters

21. Fall 2006 Distribution of Commuter Students at UNC Charlotte, per 1/4 mile square

22. Out of County Commuters, Fall 2006

23. Areas of Commuter Concentration

24. Current Transit at UNC Charlotte

28. Scenario 2

29. LRT “Walk-to” Serviced Commuters

32. Park and Rides

33. Predicting P&R Use

35. Predicting NE Corridor P&R Use

37. Potential Riders: Scenario 2

39. Scenario 3

40. Student Use of TOD

41. Potential for TOD

44. Potential Riders: Scenario 3

46. Short Term Recommendations

48. Recommended Circulator Route

52. Conclusions

54. Cited Sources “2025 Integrated Transit/Land Use Plan for Charlotte Mecklenburg: Final Report – October 1998.” (1998). Arrington, G.B. (2003). “Light Rail and the American City: State-of-the-Practice for Transit- Oriented Development.” Transportation Research Circular: Ninth National Light Rail Transit Conference, Washington D.C.: Transportation Research Board. pp. 189-204. Online. Retrieved on October 16, 2006, from http://trb.org/publications/circulars/ec058/ec058.pdfhttp://trb.org/publications/circulars/ec058/ec058.pdf Cervero, R. and Duncan, M. (2002). “Transit’s Value Added Effects: Light and Commuter Rail Services and Commercial Land Values,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1805. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council. “Corridor System Plan: Staff Recommendations.” (2002). Charlotte Area Transportation System. Online. Retrieved 10 October 2006 from http://www.charmeck.org/NR/rdonlyres/evk2qkx7t6qcmduxqbj47aaxzzyu4loz54q3uvb4kjhuc hhe5qkuj3bgzlpdi7qodr5f4vfy4ghu4ykaycw7pfhulle/SystemPlanReport.pdf http://www.charmeck.org/NR/rdonlyres/evk2qkx7t6qcmduxqbj47aaxzzyu4loz54q3uvb4kjhuc hhe5qkuj3bgzlpdi7qodr5f4vfy4ghu4ykaycw7pfhulle/SystemPlanReport.pdf Cura, F. (2001). “More Students to Take Transit as University Pass Programs Multiply.” Passenger Transport, 22. pp. 1-2.

55. Cited Sources Force, K. (2004). “Public Transit 101: Effective Planning for College Campuses.” Metro, 100. pp. 32-36. “Guide for Park and Ride Facilities.” (2004). AASHTO Task Force on Public Transportation Facilities Design. Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Guiver, D & Robertson, B., (2006). “Utah Transit Authority, University of Utah, Students, Staff & Faculty: Summary Report.” Salt Lake City: Valley Research. McLachlan, L. (1995). “Edmonton Light Rail Transit Experience.” Conference Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Light Rail Transit: Volume I. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press. pp. 52-65. “PSU Student Transportation Survey, Spring 2005: Summary Report.” (2005). Parking and Transportation Services – Portland State University. “UNC Charlotte: Admissions – General Information.” (2006). Online. http://www.admissions.uncc.edu/jump/Admissions/index_general.asp. Accessed: November 10, 2006.

56. Cited Sources “UNCC’s Big Day.” (2006). UNC Charlotte Public Relations: UNC Charlotte in the News. February 3, 2006. Online. http://www.publicrelations.uncc.edu/default.asp?id=30&objId=36. Accessed November 10, 2006. Weinstein, B. & Cowler, L. (2002). “”An Assessment of the DART LRT on Taxable Property Valuations and Transit Oriented Development.” Denton: University of North Texas. Online. Retrieved October 16, 2006, from http://www.unt.edu/cedr/dart2002.pdf