Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Robert Morris Daniel Aguayo, John Bicket, Sanjit Biswas, Douglas De Couto MIT Roofnet Performance.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Robert Morris Daniel Aguayo, John Bicket, Sanjit Biswas, Douglas De Couto MIT Roofnet Performance."— Presentation transcript:

1 Robert Morris Daniel Aguayo, John Bicket, Sanjit Biswas, Douglas De Couto http://pdos.lcs.mit.edu/roofnet MIT Roofnet Performance

2 2 Roofnet node map 1 kilometer

3 3 Typical rooftop view

4 4 Roofnet radio links 1 kilometer

5 5 A Roofnet Self-Installation Kit Computer ($340) 533 MHz PC, hard disk, CDROM 802.11b card ($155) Engenius Prism 2.5, 200mW Software (“free”) Our networking software based on Click Antenna ($65) 8dBi, 20 degree vertical Miscellaneous ($75) Chimney Mount, Lightning Arrestor, etc. 50 ft. Cable ($40) Low loss (3dB/100ft) Takes a user about 45 minutes to install on a flat roof Total: $685

6 6 Roofnet Node Software 802.11 eth Linux TCP/IP Click Linux Kernel User-space sshdapache dhcpd antenna Living-room ethernet NAT srcrr ETX

7 7 Roofnet link quality distribution Node Pair Packet Delivery Probability 1 megabit/second 11 mbits/sec

8 8 S/N vs loss w/ cable + attenuator

9 9 S/N vs loss for Roofnet links

10 10 Transmit bit-rate choice Node Pair Packets/second received 11 megabits/second 5.5 2 1

11 11 Basic Roofnet performance HopsNode Pairs Throughput Kilobits/sec Latency ms 1179252812 235478422 335436839 425627244 512721661 64324881 73818472 81716898 96152121

12 12 Multi-hop packet loss?

13 13 What is a typical radio range? Distance (Meters) Delivery probability

14 14 Effect of transmit power level

15 15 Would a less-dense mesh work? NodesConnectivityThroughput Kilobits/sec Hop Count 417%161.3 950%802.2 1495%1443.0 19100%2243.5 24100%2563.5 29100%2563.2 34100%3203.3 Roofnet is about twice as dense as it needs to be Higher densities provide higher throughput

16 16 Mesh versus access points APs or gateways AP throughput AP connections Mesh throughput 116025952 2688341616 3864381880 41144402096 51152412040 61608412184 71856412296 5 APs are required for full connectivity N mesh gateways give higher throughput than N APs

17 17 Conclusions Roofnet provides Internet access to 40+ users Easy for users to install, self-configuring Throughput > 200 kilobits/second for most users Even 9-hop routes average 150 kilobits/second Radio range up to 2km, density 10 nodes/km 2 Hard to beat mesh performance w/ access points Multi-hop packet loss costs about a factor of two

18 18 How reliant on the “best” nodes? Average Throughput (KB/s) Number of Best Nodes Eliminated


Download ppt "Robert Morris Daniel Aguayo, John Bicket, Sanjit Biswas, Douglas De Couto MIT Roofnet Performance."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google