Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAnabel Daniels Modified over 9 years ago
1
2009 Annual NWTEMC Conference October 6 – 7, 2009 Worley, Idaho
2
Overall Objective Tuition Free DHS Approved Training 2 Rural emergency responders face unique challenges Congress and the Department of Homeland Security established the Rural Domestic Preparedness Consortium (RDPC or the Consortium) to develop and deliver training to meet their needs Training is DHS certified and tuition-free Courses are delivered in partnership with rural jurisdictions and rural responders. Consortium is led by Eastern Kentucky University and comprised of 6 academic partners Each partner possesses extensive experience and niche capabilities to develop training for the rural emergency response community
3
Mission & Vision Mission The Rural Domestic Preparedness Consortium, through its member institutions, will provide rural communities with the knowledge, skills and abilities to enhance the safety, security and quality of life for their citizens through training, technical assistance and information sharing. Vision Rural communities across America will have the knowledge, skills and abilities necessary to enhance the safety, security and quality of life for their citizens. 3
4
What is Rural? 4 Small, Rural, or Remote: Any location with a population of less than 50,000 persons or a population density of less than 1,000 persons per square mile. -- RDPC Definition
5
Academic Partners East Tennessee State University Rural Emergency Medical & Healthcare Iowa Central Community College Rural Response Training (NIMS) NorthWest Arkansas Community College Private Sector/Business Continuity The University of Findlay Environmental Resource Training North Carolina Central University Rural Volunteerism/Minority Communities Eastern Kentucky University – Executive Agent Rural Law Enforcement, Fire, and EMS 5
6
Advisory Board Organizations Law Enforcement International Association of Chiefs of Police International Association of Directors of Law Enforcement Standard & Training National Sheriffs’ Association Fraternal Order of Police Fire Service International Association of Fire Chiefs North American Fire Training Directors National Volunteer Fire Council Emergency Medical Services National Association of EMS Physicians National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians National Association of State EMS Officials National Association of EMS Educators General Government National Association of Counties National Governors Association Public Health National Rural Health Association National Guard Adjutants General Association of the U.S. Emergency Management International Association of Emergency Managers National Emergency Management Association Private Sector ASIS International 6
7
RDPC Training Delivery
8
Current DHS Certified Courses AWARENESS LEVEL AWR 144 Port & Vessel Security for Public Safety & Maritime Personnel (8 Hrs) AWR 147 Rail Car Incident Response AWR 148 Disaster Management for School-Based Incidents: Partnering Rural Law Enforcement and Local School Systems (8 Hrs) AWR 186 Emergency Responders & the Deaf & Hard of Hearing Community (8 Hrs) AWR 187-W Terrorism & WMD Awareness in the Workplace * AWR 187-S Spanish language version * (Coming soon) PERFORMANCE LEVEL PER 281-W Homeland Security Terrorism Prevention Certificate for Law Enforcement * PER 280 Strengthening Cooperative Efforts Among Public Safety & Private Sector Entities MANAGEMENT LEVEL MGT 335 Event Security Planning for Public Safety Professionals (16 Hrs) MGT 381 Business Continuity & Emergency Management (8 Hrs) * Web-based training More courses currently under development 8
9
Delivery Methods Classroom-based Internet Satellite broadcast Television broadcast Computer-based Instructional Aids Pre/post tests Table top exercises Practical scenarios Leave-behind tools Delivery Methods 9
10
How to Schedule Training 10 Step 1.Local jurisdiction or state training POC inquires about training content; makes preliminary request at: info@ruraltraining.org 877-855-RDPC (7372) Step 2. Local jurisdiction or RDPC staff notify state administrative agency (SAA) of request. Step 3. RDPC confirms delivery date, location, and preliminary logistics with local jurisdiction. Step 4. Training placed on official schedule and Web site; marketing and registration begins.
11
Post timely training and news items on homepage Provide strategic links to organization and publication sites Cross-promote specific courses Access RSS and e-mail alerts for RDPC updates Post web-based courses and promote courses through video on Rural Responder Network Download / order reports, video courses, etc. RuralTraining.org 11
12
Course catalog Training schedule Press releases & information Profiles of academic partners List of Board organizations Coming soon On-line student registration Web-based training delivery www.ruraltraining.org RuralTraining.org 12
13
RDPC Research
14
National Rural Preparedness Summit Two held since 2007 Omaha, NE - 2007 San Antonio, TX - 2008 One element of RDPC’s national needs and training gap identification process along with the RDPC National Training Needs Survey Practitioners from all levels of government and responder disciplines identify critical, multidisciplinary homeland security training needs Summit and National Training Needs Survey results inform the Consortium’s training agenda for the coming year Third Annual Summit tentatively planned for Spring 2010 14
15
Location San Antonio, Texas - October 7 - 8, 2008 Attendance 29 rural practitioners from Emergency Services Sector, public health, emergency management, and state and local government Outcomes 13 critical needs identified and validated by practitioners in attendance to include a request for RDPC to develop more tools and job aids which may be used in the field These needs will serve to augment findings gathered in the 2007 annual needs assessment survey and will shape the RDPC training agenda in the coming year For more information on results of the Summit go to www.RuralTraining.org 2 nd Annual National Rural Emergency Preparedness Summit 15
16
National Training Needs Survey (NTNS): Purpose RDPC Requirement Conduct National Multi-Disciplinary Assessments to Determine Training Needs RDPC Assessment Administered Biennially Targeted Capabilities List The TCL serves as the basis for the design and framework for the collection process 16
17
17 Overview 2006 National Training Needs Survey Assessing the Needs of Rural Emergency Responders Overview 2006 National Training Needs Survey Assessing the Needs of Rural Emergency Responders
18
Targeted rural emergency responders from the following disciplines: Fire Service Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Public Health General Government The survey sample was drawn from the following sources: National Public Safety Information Bureau (NPSIB) National Association of Counties (NACo) National League of Cities (NLC) 18 2006 NTNS: Sample
19
19 3, 180 Surveys Mailed 3, 107 Adjusted Sample Size 1, 034 Surveys Received 33 Response Rate 33 Response Rate % 2006 NTNS: Response Rate
20
20 2006 NTNS: Key Findings All Respondents / Interdisciplinary Planning for Terrorism Events Local Government WMD/Hazardous Materials Response and Decontamination Emergency Medical CBRNE Detection Law Enforcement Responder Safety and Health Fire Service Citizen Preparedness & Participation Identified Training Needs (over next two years)
21
21 2007 National Training Needs Survey A Focus on Rural Emergency Responders in the Emergency Management and General Government Disciplines 2007 National Training Needs Survey A Focus on Rural Emergency Responders in the Emergency Management and General Government Disciplines
22
2007 NTNS: Sample Targeted rural emergency responders from the following disciplines: Emergency Management General Government Mayors City Managers County Officials Public Works and Public Utilities Directors School Superintendents The survey sample was drawn from the following sources: Emergency Management International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM) National Emergency Management Association (NEMA) General Government National Association of Counties (NACo) American Association of School Administrators (AASA) United States Conference of Mayors (USCM) 22
23
2007 NTNS: Survey Instrument Development of the survey instrument Questions are designed to capture the following: Demographics Training needs Training received Training delivery experiences and preferences The target capabilities are translated into user-friendly language and used to develop the training needs questions. 23
24
2007 NTNS: Response Rate 24 5, 076 Surveys Mailed 4, 931 Adjusted Sample Size 1, 808 Surveys Received 37 Response Rate %
25
2007 NTNS: Key Findings Figure 1: Most Important Areas of Training (n=1377) 25
26
2007 NTNS: Key Findings In analyzing the results of a second training needs question, a need for training in the area of pandemic/other health-related outbreak was revealed. Emergency Management Three out of the top five tasks in which respondents indicated having low confidence but considered highly important to their job function were related to pandemic/health-related outbreaks. General Government All of the top five tasks in which respondents indicated having low confidence but considered highly important to their job function were related to pandemic/health-related outbreaks. 26
27
2007 NTNS: Key Findings Key Findings: Training Delivery Respondents were asked a series of questions to gather information about the type of training delivery they have recently received and the type of training delivery that they prefer. Respondents were also asked to identify how decisions to attend trainings are made and what barriers prevent them from attending trainings. 27
28
Factors Influencing Training Decisions and Attendance How far in advance do you make a decision to attend a training? (n=1703) 28
29
Training Attendance Barriers BarrierAll Respondents (%) Cost of Travel64 Time Away from Work58 Training Location58 Relevance of Course Content37 Time Away from Family30 Insufficient Backfill in Jurisdiction20 Cost of Overtime13 Cost of Backfill9 Reluctance to Travel9 Lack of Access to Technology/Equipment5 Required to Use Annual Leave3 Other5 29
30
Influential Factors in Selecting Training Courses FactorAll Respondents (%) Satisfy Personal Learning Needs and Training Goals71 Topic of Interest68 To Maintain Job Qualifications56 Training Location48 Dates Course Offered43 Reputation of Training Provider or Facility34 Supervisor Required Specific Training26 Times Course Presented22 Availability and/or Number of CEUs Offered13 30
31
Sources Used to Identify Training Courses SourceAll Respondents (%) State Agency67 State Websites64 Professional/Trade Associations53 Professional/Trade Publications and Magazines47 DHS or Other Federal Website47 Word of Mouth42 Agency Head and/or Training Coordinator33 Local Community College/ College/University27 Local Websites19 Other Websites17 Other11 31
32
2007 NTNS: Key Findings Key Findings: Training Delivery Training Delivery Method 1.Lecture/Seminar 2.Hands-On Exercises 3.Online 4.CD-ROM 5.Videoconferencing 6.Web Stream/Webcast 7.Correspondence Course Training Location 1.Local 2.Regional 3.State 4.National 32
33
33 2009 National Training Needs Survey 2009 National Training Needs Survey
34
2009 NTNS: Purpose 1.RDPC conducted a targeted examination of training needs by reverting to the original assessment in sampling all emergency responder disciplines as identified by FEMA. 2.This approach was guided in part by lessons learned from both the 2006 and 2007 assessments and suggestions made by the RDPC Advisory Board Members. 34
35
2009 NTNS: Sample Emergency Management Agency Personnel (EMAP) International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM) Emergency Medical Services (EMS) National Public Safety Information Bureau (NPSIB) Fire Services (FS) NPSIB Governmental Administrators (GA) City Managers, Mayors, County Administrators, and School Administrators National Association of Counties (NACo) National League of Cities (NLC) American Association of School Administrators (AASA ) Emergency Responders from 8 Disciplines Targeted Healthcare/Public Health (HCPH) Environmental health officials, public health nurses and administrators, hospital administrators, and coroners/medical examiners NACo and NPSIB Law Enforcement (LE) College/university campuses, county and municipal police departments, and sheriff departments NPSIB Public Safety Communications (PSC) Association of Public-Safety Communications International (APCO) Public Works/Public Utilities (PWPU) NLC 35
36
2009 NTNS: Survey Instrument Survey Questions Categorized into Three Major Areas 1.Basic demographic and background information 2.Identification of training delivery experiences and preferences 3.Identification of training needs and gaps Eight versions of the survey instrument were created to target the unique demographic information for each of eight emergency responder disciplines. 36
37
2009 NTNS: Response Rate 5, 873 Surveys Mailed 5, 775 Adjusted Sample Size 1, 627 Surveys Received 28 Response Rate % 37
38
Training Needs and Gaps: Interdisciplinary/Across All Disciplines The top five training areas that respondents reported as being important to their job functions, but were not confident in performing the tasks related to the area: 1.Isolation and Quarantine 2.Information Gathering and Recognition of Indicators and Warnings 3.Environmental Health 4.Critical Infrastructure Protection 5.Intelligence Analysis and Production These topics would lend themselves to an interdisciplinary course delivery format. 38
39
Training Needs and Gaps: Emergency Management Agency Personnel (EMAP) The top five training areas that EMAP respondents reported as being important to their job functions, but were not confident in performing the tasks related to the area: 1. Economic and Community Recovery 2. Intelligence Analysis and Production 2. Isolation and Quarantine 4. Restoration of Lifelines 5. Food and Agriculture Safety and Defense N = 242 39
40
Training Needs and Gaps: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) The top five training areas that EMS respondents reported as being important to their job functions, but were not confident in performing the tasks related to the area: 1. Information Gathering and Recognition of Indicators and Warnings 2. Intelligence and Information Sharing and Dissemination 3. Isolation and Quarantine 4. Critical Infrastructure Protection 5. Environmental Health 5. Fatality Management N = 197 40
41
Training Needs and Gaps: Fire Services (FS) The top five training areas that Fire Service respondents reported as being important to their job functions, but were not confident in performing the tasks related to the area: 1. Information Gathering and Recognition of Indicators and Warnings 2. Critical Infrastructure Protection 3. Intelligence and Information Sharing and Dissemination 3. Isolation and Quarantine 5. CBRNE Detection 5. Environmental Health 5. Intelligence Analysis and Production N = 163 41
42
Training Needs and Gaps: Governmental Administrators (GA) The top five training areas that Governmental Administrator respondents reported as being important to their job functions, but were not confident in performing the tasks related to the area: 1.Economic and Community Recovery 2.Isolation and Quarantine 3.Intelligence Analysis and Production 4.Information Gathering and Recognition of Indicators and Warnings 5.Critical Infrastructure Protection N = 202 42
43
Training Needs and Gaps: Healthcare/Public Health (HCPH) The top five training areas that Healthcare / Public Health respondents reported as being important to their job functions, but were not confident in performing the tasks related to the area: 1. Fatality Management 2. Animal Disease Emergency Support 2. Information Gathering and Recognition of Indicators and Warnings 4. Risk Management 5. Food and Agriculture Safety and Defense N = 250 43
44
Training Needs and Gaps: Law Enforcement (LE) The top five training areas that Law Enforcement respondents reported as being important to their job functions, but were not confident in performing the tasks related to the area: 1. WMD and HAZMAT Response and Decontamination 2. Intelligence Analysis and Production 3. CBRNE Detection 3. Environmental Health 5. Isolation and Quarantine N = 208 44
45
Training Needs and Gaps: Public Safety Communications (PSC) The top five training areas that Public Safety Communications respondents reported as being important to their job functions, but were not confident in performing the tasks related to the area: 1. Information Gathering and Recognition of Indicators and Warnings 2. Critical Infrastructure Protection 3. CBRNE Detection 3. Intelligence Analysis and Production 5. Isolation and Quarantine 5. Restoration of Lifelines N = 236 45
46
Training Needs and Gaps: Public Works/Public Utilities (PWPU) The top five training areas that Public Works/Public Utilities respondents reported as being important to their job functions, but were not confident in performing the tasks related to the area: 1. Environmental Health 2. Structural Damage Assessment 3. Critical Infrastructure Protection 3. WMD and HAZMAT Response and Decontamination 5. Economic and Community Recovery 5. Restoration of Lifelines N = 129 46
47
Summary: Key Points The top training need and gap identified across all disciplines was “Isolation and Quarantine,” which is similar to the findings of the 2007 survey in which “Public Health-related Emergencies” was identified as a training need and gap. Direct correlation between identified training needs and gaps and related training not being received by respondents For all disciplines, training needs and gaps were identified across all four mission areas – indicative of a need for an “all- hazards” training 47
48
2009 Tribal Nations Survey
49
Problem Statement Although homeland security training is currently available for emergency responders in Tribal Nations, never has there been research to validate the training needs of responders in Tribal Nations.
50
Research Objectives 1)To gain knowledge of the demography of emergency responders in Tribal Nations 2)To assess responders' training experiences and preferences 3)To identify training needs and gaps based on the Target Capabilities List (TCL)
51
Methodology: Sample All 562 federally recognized American Indian and Alaskan Native (AIAN) tribes Directory was obtained via electronically from the Bureau of Indian Affairs Responders from eight (8) disciplines were invited to participate: Emergency Management Emergency Medical Services Fire Services Governmental Administrative (e.g., Tribal Leader) Healthcare/Public Health Law Enforcement Public Safety Communications Public Works/Public Utilities
52
Methodology: Data Collection Survey mirrors the NTNS in its overall goals and objectives RDPC partnered with several representatives of tribal nations in the development of the research design: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe Northwest Tribal Emergency Management Council
53
Methodology: Data Collection During collecting data, RDPC has received feedback from Tribal Nations regarding their willingness and cooperation with the study to identify training needs: Northern Cheyenne Tribe “The Northern Cheyenne Tribe would be most pleased to participate in this project. We recognize the need for ongoing training and would also look forward to benefiting from any that develops as a result of the findings.”
54
Methodology: Data Collection Other Tribal Nations have provided updated and/or additional contact information to ensure the survey reaches the most appropriate individual(s) to respond to the survey to identify training needs: Comanche Nation Cedarville Rancheria Osage Nation Swinomish Indian Tribal Community
55
Methodology: Survey Instrument Both mail-in and online formats will be used to collect data Instrument will be comprised of multiple- choice, ranking, and open-ended questions in order to meet the three (3) research objectives
56
Survey Participation Are you interested in participating in the survey, but have not received an invitation from RDPC? If so, please contact Nathan Lowe for more details: Phone: 859-622-6763 E-mail: Nathan.Lowe@eku.eduNathan.Lowe@eku.edu
57
Point of Contact Dr. Pam Collins Principal Investigator, RDPC Executive Director, Justice and Safety Center Phone: 859-622-1977 E-mail: Pam.Collins@eku.eduPam.Collins@eku.edu Mailing Address: Eastern Kentucky University 50 Stratton Building 521 Lancaster Avenue Richmond, Kentucky 40475
58
Questions & Comments
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.