1. 2015-16 Results-based Monitoring Webinar – Impacted LEAs September 17, 2015

2. Consolidated Planning & Monitoring Eve Carney Executive Director Eve.Carney@tn.gov

3. District Selection Risk Analysis

4. District Selection: Risk Analysis Designed to target departmental support where most needed An annual risk analysis identifies which LEAs are perceived to be at-risk based on various IDEA and ESEA indicators (programmatic, fiscal, administrative, and achievement) The programmatic risk analysis is weighted differently for program monitoring and fiscal monitoring.

5. District Selection: Risk Analysis There is often considerable overlap between program and fiscal risk, so many LEAs will receive both program and fiscal monitoring. Two LEAs, not identified through the risk analysis, are randomly selected for results-based and fiscal monitoring.

6. District Selection: Risk Analysis Indicators Categories included in the 2015-16 risk analysis: –Fiscal –Personnel –Monitoring, Audit & Compliance –Reporting Deadlines –Complaints & Hearings (with actual findings) –Student Outcomes –Additional Risk Concerns ESEA Programs IDEA Programs Fiscal

8. Results-based Monitoring Process

9. Monitoring Documents Documents are located on ePlan in the LEA Document Library / 2016 folder under: –Results-Based Monitoring for IDEA & ESEA Programs Documents –Joint Fiscal Monitoring Documents Required documentation is uploaded prior to onsite visit. –There is a document list for results-based and one for fiscal –See “Monitoring Documents List” (under appropriate folder) –Upload required documents under appropriate document links Many documents are reviewed on-site but no extra copies of documentation are expected. –See “Monitoring Documents List” for documents required on-site for review during visit

10. Monitoring Process Overview Why a results-based monitoring tool? –Shifts focus from compliance to program effectiveness –Encourages collaborative conversations around district programs –Provides a better understanding of successes and challenges How is the results-based monitoring tool organized? –Based on factors influencing student outcomes –Combines IDEA & ESEA monitoring items –Adds an Improvement Plan focusing on suggested strategies to increase student outcomes –Includes a Compliance Action Plan

11. Monitoring Team Who is the Monitoring team? –Lead: CPM Regional Consultant –CPM Regional Consultant –Staff representing Special Education and other critical subgroups and other areas (EL, non-public, etc.) –Fiscal consultants when needed –CPM Nashville staff when needed

12. Monitoring Process Overview Step 1. TDOE identifies LEAs based on risk and notifies selected LEAs Step 2. Data collection –TDOE gathers assessment and growth data on districts and schools by proficiency levels, subjects and subgroups (SWD, ED, etc.) –TDOE reviews LEA consolidated application and budget for ESEA and IDEA –TDOE reviews LEA strategic plan –TDOE requests LEA upload specific items

13. Monitoring Process Overview Step 3. TDOE selects schools based upon school assessment results and other factors –At least two schools are selected for a two hour onsite visit –Additional sites such as a preschool, non-public school, or program maybe also be selected Step 4. Phone call between TDOE and LEA to explain the process and clarify expectations –TDOE wants to see and hear about day-to-day procedures –LEA and School interviews –Note: Preparing boxes of information is not necessary –Agenda is negotiated with the LEA

14. Monitoring Process Overview Step 5. TDOE conducts an on-site visit for approximately 3.5 days –Entrance meeting (approximately one hour) with the district leadership and other relevant staff to review district strategic plan, initiatives, best practices, challenges, etc. –Meetings with ESEA Director, IDEA Supervisor, and program staff –School visits –Time slots for TDOE to write comments and final report (at least two) –Review and modify final report with ESEA Director, IDEA Supervisor –Exit conference with LEA leadership

15. Monitoring Process Overview Step 6. While on-site TDOE completes written comments, improvement plan, and compliance action plan; the LEA status letter is sent after the visit –Prior to the exit conference, the results-based monitoring comments are drafted –The exemplary practices, improvement plan and compliance action plan are revised in the exit conference (suggestions from the LEA are incorporated into the final document) –TDOE supervisory staff approved the monitoring document –Letter indicating Closed or Incomplete status is sent to the LEA

16. Monitoring Process Overview Process relies heavily on interviews with LEA staff and listening to their procedures, best practices, and challenges. School site visits are conducted by meeting with the principal and school leadership then walking through classrooms and parts of the building.

17. Monitoring Process Overview TDOE drafts all comments, improvement recommends, and compliance action plan while in the district. An on-site exit conference to review the completed written monitoring instrument with LEA leadership.

18. Results-based Monitoring Document

19. How is the results-based monitoring tool organized? –Based on and organized by factors influencing student outcomes –Combines IDEA & ESEA monitoring items –Adds an Improvement Plan focusing on suggested strategies to increase student outcomes –Includes a Compliance Action Plan

20. Major Sections of the Monitoring Document Quality Leadership Effective Teachers Instructional Practices Climate and Culture Parent and Community Involvement Appendices Practices, Improvement & Compliance Action Plan

21. Quality Leadership

22. Effective Teachers

23. Instructional Practices

24. Climate and Culture

25. Parent and Community Involvement

26. Practices, Improvement & Compliance Action Plan

27. Monitoring Contact Information

29. Regional Consultants – Contact Information CPM Regional Consultants 1)Corey Currie Corey.Currie@tn.gov (731) 234-5417 Corey.Currie@tn.gov 2)Janet (Michelle) Mansfield Janet.Mansfield@tn.gov (731) 225-3627 Janet.Mansfield@tn.gov 3)Bridgett Carwile Bridgett.Carwile@tn.gov (615) 626-3466 Bridgett.Carwile@tn.gov 4)Courtney Woods Courtney.Woods@tn.gov (615) 864-5471 Courtney.Woods@tn.gov 5)Deborah Thompson Deborah.Thompson@tn.gov (615) 864-5162 Deborah.Thompson@tn.gov 6)Jacki Wolfe Jacki.Wolfe@tn.gov (423) 262-3296 Jacki.Wolfe@tn.gov Finance Regional Consultants 1)Cindy Smith Cindy.Smith@tn.gov (731) 571-4548 Cindy.Smith@tn.gov 2)Brad Davis Brad.Davis@tn.gov (615) 308-3616 Brad.Davis@tn.gov 3)Robert (Rob) Mynhier Robert.Mynhier@tn.gov (615) 253-4842 Robert.Mynhier@tn.gov 4)Brian Runion Brian.Runion@tn.gov (931) 488-3050 Brian.Runion@tn.gov 5)Dustin Winstead Dustin.Winstead@tn.gov (865) 253-5821 Dustin.Winstead@tn.gov 6)Jackie Broyles Jackie.Broyles@tn.gov (423) 283-1431 Jackie.Broyles@tn.gov

30. Questions

31. Questions?

32. FRAUD, WASTE or ABUSE Citizens and agencies are encouraged to report fraud, waste or abuse in State and Local government. NOTICE: This agency is a recipient of taxpayer funding. If you observe an agency director or employee engaging in any activity which you consider to be illegal, improper or wasteful, please call the state Comptroller’s toll- free Hotline: 1-800-232-5454 Notifications can also be submitted electronically at: http://www.comptroller.tn.gov/hotline