Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAugustine Morton Modified over 8 years ago
1
Adv. Inst. Techs
2
flame emission (eg flame photometer) known as low temperature emission (2000- 3000K) ◦ first form of spectroscopy ◦ used in commercial analytical instrument in 1930s atomic absorption important from 1960s-90s this chapter will cover high temperature (5000-10000K) emission methods ◦ have been around for more than 50 years ◦ two sources of energy: electricity (arc or spark) plasma both remain important
3
What advantages would high temperature sources have over low temperature ones? higher intensity => better sensitivity better atomisation => less matrix interference more elements (some non-metals)
4
for high T sources, the number of atomic lines requires v. high resolution (beyond a slit monochromator) for scanning instruments, the detector moves on a circular path (like XRF) Wavelength Separation Source (incl. sample) Collimator Detector
5
ExcitationEmission Desolvation Evaporation Atomisation Ionisation MX(aq) MX(s) MX(g) M(g) M + (g)
6
sequential – one emission line can be measured at any one time; only one detector moving on a circular path to pick up the dispersed lines via a grating (no exit slit) simultaneous – where multiple detectors are available, either as single units (eg PMTs) or a bank of semiconductor devices (eg diode array); ◦ polychromator – multiple exit slits at fixed positions for different emission wavelengths; scanning is not possible
7
Simultaneous multiple fixed position detectors
8
older instruments could not scan nor vary the set wavelengths new instruments have a array detector with 100,000+ pixels like a TV (a diode array on steroids) allows instant full spectrum – no moving parts
9
arc/spark instruments have dominated metals analysis multi-element, solid sampling as long as the matrix can be matched by standards otherwise AAS now ICP use high power electricity between electrodes, one being the sample sample is vapourised, so this isn’t non-destructive arc & spark differ in the means of applying the electrical energy
10
a plasma is a contained vapour of ions and electrons argon forms the most stable plasma contained within a torch:three concentric quartz tubes, each carrying a stream of argon copper coils surround the end of the torch RF energy applied which creates the conditions to excite and contain the plasma maximum temp. 10,000K
11
the extreme temperatures produce almost perfect atomisation mixture of ions and atoms giving more lines per element the linear detection range is very great; typically 10,000 times more elements emit, eg P and S lower detection limits, typically 50 ug/L
12
have to be less efficient than AAS to avoid the plasma becoming unstable due to too much sample pneumatic – where gas pressure directly or indirectly breaks up the liquid, eg concentric, Babington, V-groove ultrasonic – oscillations from an ultrasonic generator break up the sample into the aerosol, which is then carried by the gas; good for slurries
13
three concentric quartz tubes, with the copper RF coils at the top plasma flow – the outer tube provides the bulk of the argon for the plasma, but also achieves cooling for the quartz auxiliary flow –buffer between the inner and outer flows, helps in plasma stability inner flow – from the nebuliser plasma flow auxiliary flow inner flow RF coils
14
radial was first axial required better cooling axial is more sensitive due to greater pathlength has more “interference” by other elements for same reason (a) (b) radial axial
15
not completely free of sample variations, especially flow rates & uptake through the nebuliser samples in organic solvents or with significant organic content (eg wine) will cause the plasma to become unstable due to extra uptake compared to aqueous require an increase in RF power, more argon flow and lower nebuliser pump rate to achieve stability critical to use an internal standard in such situations
16
typically 10 times better sensitivity the ability to measure non-metals such as P, S, N and the halogens low levels of chemical interferences, such as ionisation and non-atomisation multi-component analysis (though a new design of flame AAS by Varian allows up to six wavelengths to be measured in rapid succession without resetting the instrument) linear ranges of 1000 times rather than 10 times
17
ICP disadvantages: they still cost at least four times more, but the price difference is coming down all the time spectral interferences are greater, because there so many peaks, some are bound to overlap relative precision is higher very high argon use, which makes the running costs significantly higher fast sequential AAS with multi-element lamps counter the multi-component advantage of ICP ICP-MS will probably replace electrothermal AAS in next decade
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.