Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGordon Harmon Modified over 8 years ago
1
Myeloid Blastic Transformation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms A Review of 112 Cases Presenter: Syed Jawad Noor, PGY3 Mentor: Meir Wetzler June 09, 2010
2
Our Team Syed J. Noor Wei Tan Gregory E. Wilding Laurie A. Ford Maurice Barcos Sheila N.J. Sait Annemarie W. Block James E. Thompson Eunice S. Wang Meir Wetzler
3
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs) Clonal hematologic diseases Excess production of ≥1 lineages of mature blood cells Predisposition to bleeding and thrombotic complications Extramedullary hemotopoiesis A variable progression to leukemia
4
MPN Types Polycythemia Vera (PV) Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) Myelofibrosis (MF) Primary MF (PMF) Secondary MF (SMF)
5
Polycythemia Vera (PV) An expansion in red blood cell production Essential Thrombocytosis (ET) An isolated elevation in platelet count
6
Myelofibrosis (MF) A fibrotic bone marrow and peripheral cytopenia Higher risk of leukemic transformation Primary or secondary (post-PV or post-ET)
7
JAK2 mutation in MPN JAK2 Signaling PP L 95% in PV; 50-60% in ET and MF
8
Myeloid Blastic Transformation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms MPNs are known to transform into acute leukemia in approximately 4-6% of the patients ~50% of acute leukemia cases following JAK2- positive MPN continue to carry the mutation Pathogenesis of the blastic transformation in MPN remains unclear
9
Known risk factors for Blastic Transformation Alkylating agents Radiation DNA damaging chemotherapy drugs
10
Research Study Objectives To gain more insight into the evolution & risk factors playing role in blastic transformation Treatment outcome of patients developing blastic transformation from classic MPN
11
Methods
12
Patients 89 cases from literature 23 cases from RPCI PV, ET, MF, SMF or MPN-U Blast phase defined as persistent ≥20% marrow or peripheral blood blasts
13
Contd… Therapy anthracycline (daunorubicin at 60 mg/m2) + cytosine arabinoside (100 mg/m2) chemotherapy in a “7+3” fashion
14
Contd… 3 pt had SCT in addition to chemotherapy All other pts received supportive care only Response was CR or CRi
15
Statistical Analyses Fisher’s exact test. Wilcoxon rank sum test. Kaplan-Meier method. log-rank test. SAS (version 9.1)
16
Results Both RPCI and literature pt. populations did not differ in Age at diagnosis of MPN or blastic transformation, Gender Prior use of interferon Karyotype aberrations Overall survival of the two cohorts was similar and poor
17
Comparison between RPCI dataset and other three datasets
18
Diagnosis Differences Percent
19
Time from MPN diagnosis to Blast phase Percent
20
Less than 3 Therapies Percent
21
Prior Hydroxyurea Therapy Percent
22
Prior Alkylating Agents Percent
23
Prior Erythropoietin Percent
24
Normal Karyotype Percent
25
Insignificant Variables of both Cohorts Age @ MPN diagnosis Age @ AML diagnosis Gender Prior use of Interferon Karyotype aberrations
26
Overall Survival
27
Survival analysis for RPCI + other three data sets
28
Months Survival By Diagnosis
29
Age at MPN Diagnosis P=0.0493 Age @ MPN ≥60 <60
30
Less than 3 Therapies P=0.0242 <3 Therapies N Y
31
Complex Karyotype P=0.0104 Complex Karyotype Y N
32
Non-significant variables Time from MPN diagnosis to Blast phase Age @ AML diagnosis Gender Prior Hydroxyurea Prior Alkylating Agents Prior Erythropoietin Prior Interferon Karyotype abnormalities other than Complex Kryotype
33
Survival analysis for RPCI dataset
34
Median Survival in Months P <0.0001 P 0.0031 P 0.0119 P 0.0009
35
Discussion Reasons for the heterogeneity -- Differing criteria for MPN diagnosis --Variety in the yield of karyotype analysis Whether blastic transformation is a sequel of therapy, natural progression or a combination of the two continues
36
Contd…. Superior survival with allogeneic SCT SCT should be considered before the disease progresses to the blastic phase
37
Contd…. Selective JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, INCB018424, has demonstrated some single agent activity in relapsed/refractory patients with leukemic transformation of Myelofibrosis
38
Conclusion Patients with <3 prior therapies & Lack of complex karyotype have longer survival Attempts for early identification of patients at risk for disease progression Allogeneic SCT for the eligible patient Searching for novel therapeutic agents, alone or in combination
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.