Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Importance to the Off-Shore Energy Industry James Done Chad Teer, Wikipedia NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Importance to the Off-Shore Energy Industry James Done Chad Teer, Wikipedia NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR."— Presentation transcript:

1 Importance to the Off-Shore Energy Industry James Done Chad Teer, Wikipedia NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR is Sponsored by NSF and this work is partially supported by the Willis Research Network and the Research Program to Secure Energy for America

2 Outline Historical Gulf Storms Large-Scale Drivers of Gulf Storms Storms, Climate Variability and Change over the Gulf - NRCM - Emanuel Model Assessing the Impact of Climate Variability and Change on Storm Damage

3 Historical Gulf Storms 1966-2008: Average 4.0 storms/yr in blue box, 1.7 storms/yr in red box Genesis locations of storms that entered the red box. ¼ formed in black box. Timeseries of basin-wide storm counts (blue), storms that entered red box (red) and ratio (black) 1966 2007

4 Large-Scale Drivers of Gulf Storms The favorable summer climate is modulated by variability on a range of temporal and spatial scales. Atmospheric Drivers: - low latitude wave activity, - wave amplification zones. Oceanic Drivers: - loop current Coupled Drivers: El-Nino, Atlantic Meridional Mode and the Atlantic Multi-Decadal Oscillation...

5 Example: Madden-Julian Oscillation TC genesis is 3.5 times more likely during westerly phase of the MJO. Maloney and Hartmann (2000) The MJO is an eastward moving equatorial disturbance. Tracks of storms separated by phase of the MJO

6 Ocean Trends Global model is fully coupled to the sea. Global model shows a dramatic increase in Tropical Cyclone Heat Potential and an increase in the 70m temperature. Global model has a negative bias but recent increase has also been observed.

7 1995 – 2005 2020 – 2030 2045 - 2055 Downscaling with NRCM: TC Numbers Multi-Decadal variability in Northern Gulf storm counts 15 10 20

8 Downscaling with NRCM: Normalized Track Density

9 Downscaling with NRCM: Location of Max Intensity

10 Downscaling with NRCM: TC Intensity Distributions of max wind for all cyclones moving over the area occupied by offshore energy facilities in the Gulf of Mexico: NRCM vs Obs NRCM: Time-Slices

11 No mechanisms for low-latitude formation No change in storm counts in Gulf Downscaling with Emanuel Model: Normalized Track Density

12 Downscaling with Emanuel Model: Intensity Distributions of max wind for all cyclones moving over the area occupied by offshore energy facilities in the Gulf of Mexico: Emanuel (green) vs Obs (blue) Emanuel: Time-Slices

13 Assessing Damage: The Willis Hurricane Index Goal: To develop a comprehensive hurricane damage index. Initial development for the Off-Shore facilities in the Gulf. Adaptable to: Real-time Damage Forecasts - uses only information readily available in advisory reports from the relevant hurricane warning center. Seasonal and Climate Variability and Change - all parameters can be extracted directly from dynamical seasonal prediction and climate models. Thunderhorse after Hurricane Dennis 2005

14 www.willisresearchnetwork.com 26°N 87°W 100°W Lat/Lon Box used for WHI

15 Data and Methods Data: Willis Energy Loss Data (WELD) for the Gulf of Mexico (7 hurricanes) inflated by CEPCI (Arnold and Chiltern 1963) to 1998 values; Critical Hurricane Parameters: The amount of energy dissipated at the surface by maximum winds The radial extent and character of the surface wind field (n mile) The translational speed of the hurricane (kt). Combined these are a proxy for waves, currents and storm surge.

16 Data and Method ctd. Method: Base development largely on physical principles with care not to over specify the use of the small available data base; Independent testing to come from application during 2010 hurricane season; Combine the three critical factors in an additive formula:

17 Parameter Contributions Intensity=0.23 Translation Speed=0.71 Size=0.48

18 Parameter Determination Intensity Term: Set aa=3 following Emanuel (2005) Power Dissipation Index Normalise by setting v m0 =65 kt Constrained to hurricanes v m >65 kt Set a=1 through experimentation and sensitivity analysis

19 Size Term: Set bb=1 for consistency with areal coverage of storm winds, given translation Normalise by setting R h0 =50 n mile Set b=5 through experimentation and sensitivity analysis Parameter Determination

20 Translation Term: Set cc=2 from regression on available data Normalise by setting v t0 =15 kt Set c=5 through experimentation and sensitivity analysis Also set v t 7kt based on a posteriori checking.

21 The WHI for the Gulf of Mexico

22 Application to Gulf Losses Maximum WHI vs Losses Average WHI vs Losses R 2 =0.91 R 2 =0.96

23 Changed V m threshold from 65 to 34 kts. i.e. from Cat 1 to tropical storm strength. All parameters extracted directly from NRCM and Emanuel Model Storms Application to Climate Variability and Change: NRCM and Emanuel Storms

24 26°N 87°W 100°W Lat/Lon Box used for WHI Calculations

25 151020 Number of Storms Average Storm WHI 15 24.4 10 19.3 20 22.1 Average Storm Damage Max Storm Damage $5.7b $22.5b $2.5b $20.4b $4.3b $24.1b NRCM 1995-2005 2020-2030 2045-2055 Number* of Storms Average Storm WHI 41 27.2 40 27.0 42 27.1 Average Storm Damage Max Storm Damage $7.3b $12.2b $7.2b $11.1b $7.2b $10.1b Emanuel Model WHI Results NRCM storms show multi-decadal variability whereas Emanuel storms show almost no change. Emanuel storms are slower → higher average damage. NRCM storms can be very large → higher maximum damage

26 151020 Number of Storms Average Storm WHI 15 24.4 10 19.3 20 22.1 Average Storm Damage Max Storm Damage $5.7b $22.5b $2.5b $20.4b $4.3b $24.1b NRCM 1995-2005 2020-2030 2045-2055 Average Storm WHI27.227.027.1 Average Storm Damage Max Storm Damage $7.3b $12.2b $7.2b $11.1b $7.2b $10.1b Emanuel Model WHI Results NRCM storms show multi-decadal variability whereas Emanuel storms show almost no change. Emanuel storms are slower → higher average damage. NRCM storms can be very large → higher maximum damage

27 For Gulf Offshore Facilities Real-time Forecasts Seasonal and Climate Variability and Change Potential Extension to Universal Application (Landfall) Similar physical principles apply (intensity, size, translation speed), but: Heterogeneity of landfall infrastructure and topography; Variability in building codes and designs; Lack of impact data. WHI Summary

28 Summary Gulf storms have both local and remote influences. -important for investigations into future Gulf Storms. Global model shows dramatic increase in TC heat potential over the Gulf. – need a fully coupled high resolution model to realize this energy source. Application of WHI provides a first order assessment of likely changes in net damage to off-shore facilities. Results based on NRCM and Emanuel storms are limited by small sample size. - NRCM 12 km currently underway. - apply Emanuel model to ensemble of global model future climates.

29 Extra Slides

30 Downscaling with Emanuel Model: Intensity Average maxMax maxCount*factor 1995-200531.2574.32116 Obs31.0867.85 31 2020-203034.5769.4081 2045-205532.44 65.01101


Download ppt "Importance to the Off-Shore Energy Industry James Done Chad Teer, Wikipedia NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google