Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Indicators of Social Quality in Japan with special reference to income inequality Akiko Sato Oishi Chiba University.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Indicators of Social Quality in Japan with special reference to income inequality Akiko Sato Oishi Chiba University."— Presentation transcript:

1 Indicators of Social Quality in Japan with special reference to income inequality Akiko Sato Oishi Chiba University

2 Background  It is important to keep in mind three challenges that facing Japan, because they affect people ’ s values, institutions, and policies.

3 Background(2)  A rapid population ageing 65+/total pop. 20.2%(‘05) → 40.5%( ’ 55)  Increased fiscal+demographic pressures Reforms to make SS programs less generous: since mid 1990s  Growing inequality Gini coef. (HH size-adj. disp. inc.) 0.310( ’ 86) → 0.351( ’ 01)

4 Growing inequality (1) “ Jump ” in the late 1990s Trends in Gini coefficient (disposable income)

5 Growing inequality (2) Rising inequality among the young

6 Increased risk of poverty among children: 1987 and 2002

7  Trends in income distriution have much to do with the trends in employment  The share of non-regular workers 16%( ’ 85) → 33%( ’ 06) in which: females 69%  Average hourly wages: 30-40%  Low coverage of SS 20% not covered by pub. pen. low entitlement to parental leave  Youth unemployment 4.3% ( ’ 90) → 10.1%( ’ 03) Japan ’ s dual labor market: Increased non-regular employment

8 Declined earnings of the young (1) Men: Aged 30-39 increased joblessness

9 Declined earnings of the young(2) Men: Aged 40-49 bi-polarized

10 Generational gap The elderly vs the young  Despite the growing inequality among the young, the SS system contributes very little to improve the economic well-being of the young.  More than 70% of SS expenditure in 2005 goes to the elderly (child- related benefits: 3.8%)  Per capita income & consumption of the elderly now exceed those of the young

11

12

13 Social cohesion: Beliefs on causes of poverty (1)  From the World Values Survey 1995 “ People are poor because of laziness or lack of will ” Agree: US 61% Australia 49% Korea 49% Finland, Spain, Sweden <25% Japan ….57%

14 Beliefs on causes of poverty (2)  From the World Values Survey 1995 “ People had a high chance of escaping poverty ” Agree: US and Norway 70-80% Germany, Spain <30% Japan ….80%

15 Beliefs on causes of poverty (3)  Ohtake and Tomioka (2003) “ Without income dispersion, people will not make full effort ” 71% “ One ’ s income is determined by the person ’ s past choices and efforts ” 57% → Little support for redistribution

16 Beliefs on causes of poverty ( 4 )  The Japanese believe poverty as the outcome of individual choice rather than the outcome of external events over which individuals have little control.  Similarity between the US

17 Who are excluded in Japan?  Male, Unmarried/Divorced, Jobless, 50s  Low incidence of material deprivation compared to other OECD countries d ’ Ercole (2006) Abe(2005) Japan: 10%, OECD average 13%  High incidence of isolation (lack of social networks), particularly among men NIPSS(2006) 20% of residents in Tokyo metropolitan area lack some kind of social networks

18 Social inclusiong/exclusion  Low incidence of material deprivation

19 Tentative conclusions  How to improve social quality in a society which puts much emphasis on self-help and effort?  Issues to be persued: social networks: men/women altruism The end

20 Overview of the presentation  Socio-economic security Data availability: very good Growing inequality Dual labor market The elderly vs the young(children)  Social inclusion/exclusion Limited availability of the data Lower material deprivation High incidence of lack of social networks

21 Overview of the presentation(cont.)  Social cohesion Limited availability of the data Beliefs on the causes of poverty: little support for redistribution  Empowerment Male/female gap


Download ppt "Indicators of Social Quality in Japan with special reference to income inequality Akiko Sato Oishi Chiba University."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google