Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

TEAM #9 MEMBERS Ryan Gerst Jared Glatz Kate Gilland Figure 1 (above): Stages of SMED Improvement Figure 2 (left): Reduction of Changeover time at each.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "TEAM #9 MEMBERS Ryan Gerst Jared Glatz Kate Gilland Figure 1 (above): Stages of SMED Improvement Figure 2 (left): Reduction of Changeover time at each."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 TEAM #9 MEMBERS Ryan Gerst Jared Glatz Kate Gilland Figure 1 (above): Stages of SMED Improvement Figure 2 (left): Reduction of Changeover time at each Stage IE 436 Six Sigma Methodology2/25/14 D C B A

3  Developed by Shigeo Shingo in the early 1960s through consulting with Toyota  Originally developed to improve die press and machine tool set-ups  Applies to changeovers in all types of process today  Single-minute exchange of die (SMED) implies changeovers should take less than 10 minutes (single- digit minute)

4 FIGURE 5: CONCEPTUAL STAGES OF SMED IMPROVEMENT STAGE 2  Separate internal and external setup actions STAGE 3  Convert internal setup actions to external actions STAGE 4  Streamlining all aspects of the set-up operation STAGE 1  Observe current methodology  Ensure external setup actions performed while machine is running

5  In order to save valuable time changing tires on the car, the team carries out all external events while the driver is racing  Every team member knows his specific job and carries it out along with the other team members

6  Using SMED allows the team to change tires and refuel the racecar in the minimum possible time  Limitations of using Changeover Reduction/SMED:  Potential reduction in efficiency when adding new member who doesn’t fully understand role  Costly when adding too many members to changeover process  Potential limitation of work space when adding too many member

7 5 S methodology:  Sort/Set in order – put all tools and personnel in order  Shine – make sure tools and new tires are in good working condition  Standardize/Sustain – make every pit stop the same, so that it will be as short as possible

8  Figure 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single- Minute_Exchange_of_Diehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single- Minute_Exchange_of_Die  Figure 2: http://www.leanproduction.com/smed.htmlhttp://www.leanproduction.com/smed.html  Figure 3: http://productivityinc.wordpress.com/2011/07/25/the- cost-benefit-of-smed/http://productivityinc.wordpress.com/2011/07/25/the- cost-benefit-of-smed/  Figure 4: http://www.lean.org/Common/LexiconTerm.aspx?termid=328&h eight=550&width=700 http://www.lean.org/Common/LexiconTerm.aspx?termid=328&h eight=550&width=700  Figure 5: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=840509& show=html http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=840509& show=html  History: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single- Minute_Exchange_of_Die http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single- Minute_Exchange_of_Die  A good way to spend 30 minutes going further on this topic is to read A Revolution in Manufacturing the SMED System by Shigeo Shingo


Download ppt "TEAM #9 MEMBERS Ryan Gerst Jared Glatz Kate Gilland Figure 1 (above): Stages of SMED Improvement Figure 2 (left): Reduction of Changeover time at each."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google