1. Species and Speciation I. Species Concepts II. Recognizing Species III. Making Species - Reproductive Isolation

2. Species and Speciation I. Species Concepts II. Recognizing Species III. Making Species - Reproductive Isolation A. Pre-Zygotic Barriers

3. Species and Speciation I. Species Concepts II. Recognizing Species III. Making Species - Reproductive Isolation A. Pre-Zygotic Barriers 1. Geographic Isolation (large scale or habitat)

4. Drosophila speciation on the Hawaiian Islands. Obbard D J et al. Mol Biol Evol 2012;29:3459-3473 © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.

6. Species and Speciation I. Species Concepts II. Recognizing Species III. Making Species - Reproductive Isolation A. Pre-Zygotic Barriers 1. Geographic Isolation (large scale or habitat) 2. Temporal Isolation

7. Species and Speciation I. Species Concepts II. Recognizing Species III. Making Species - Reproductive Isolation A. Pre-Zygotic Barriers 1. Geographic Isolation (large scale or habitat) 2. Temporal Isolation 3. Behavior Isolation - don't recognize one another as mates Western MeadowlarkEastern Meadowlark

8. Species and Speciation I. Species Concepts II. Recognizing Species III. Making Species - Reproductive Isolation A. Pre-Zygotic Barriers 1. Geographic Isolation (large scale or habitat) 2. Temporal Isolation 3. Behavior Isolation - don't recognize one another as mates 4. Mechanical isolation - genitalia don't fit; limit pollinators

9. Species and Speciation I. Species Concepts II. Recognizing Species III. Making Species - Reproductive Isolation A. Pre-Zygotic Barriers 1. Geographic Isolation (large scale or habitat) 2. Temporal Isolation 3. Behavior Isolation - don't recognize one another as mates 4. Mechanical isolation - genitalia don't fit 5. Gametic Isolation - gametes transfered but sperm can't fertilize egg; this is a common isolation mechanism in species that spawn at the same time

10. Species and Speciation I. Species Concepts II. Recognizing Species III. Making Species - Reproductive Isolation A. Pre-Zygotic Barriers 1. Geographic Isolation (large scale or habitat) 2. Temporal Isolation 3. Behavior Isolation - don't recognize one another as mates 4. Mechanical isolation - genitalia don't fit 5. Gametic Isolation - gametes transfered but sperm can't fertilize egg B. Post-Zygotic Isolation

11. Species and Speciation I. Species Concepts II. Recognizing Species III. Making Species - Reproductive Isolation A. Pre-Zygotic Barriers 1. Geographic Isolation (large scale or habitat) 2. Temporal Isolation 3. Behavior Isolation - don't recognize one another as mates 4. Mechanical isolation - genitalia don't fit 5. Gametic Isolation - gametes transfered but sperm can't fertilize egg B. Post-Zygotic Isolation 1. Genomic Incompatibility - zygote dies

12. Species and Speciation I. Species Concepts II. Recognizing Species III. Making Species - Reproductive Isolation A. Pre-Zygotic Barriers 1. Geographic Isolation (large scale or habitat) 2. Temporal Isolation 3. Behavior Isolation - don't recognize one another as mates 4. Mechanical isolation - genitalia don't fit 5. Gametic Isolation - gametes transfered but sperm can't fertilize egg B. Post-Zygotic Isolation 1. Genomic Incompatibility - zygote dies 2. Hybrid Inviability - F1 has lower survival Crazy hybrids

13. Species and Speciation I. Species Concepts II. Recognizing Species III. Making Species - Reproductive Isolation A. Pre-Zygotic Barriers 1. Geographic Isolation (large scale or habitat) 2. Temporal Isolation 3. Behavior Isolation - don't recognize one another as mates 4. Mechanical isolation - genitalia don't fit 5. Gametic Isolation - gametes transfered but sperm can't fertilize egg B. Post-Zygotic Isolation 1. Genomic Incompatibility - zygote dies 2. Hybrid Inviability - F1 has lower survival 3. Hybrid Sterility - F1 has reduced reproductive success Horse: 64 chromosomes Donkey: 62 chromosomes Mule: 63 chromosomes

14. Species and Speciation I. Species Concepts II. Recognizing Species III. Making Species - Reproductive Isolation A. Pre-Zygotic Barriers 1. Geographic Isolation (large scale or habitat) 2. Temporal Isolation 3. Behavior Isolation - don't recognize one another as mates 4. Mechanical isolation - genitalia don't fit 5. Gametic Isolation - gametes transfered but sperm can't fertilize egg B. Post-Zygotic Isolation 1. Genomic Incompatibility - zygote dies 2. Hybrid Inviability - F1 has lower survival 3. Hybrid Sterility - F1 has reduced reproductive success 4. F2 breakdown - F1's survive but F2's have incompatible combo's of genes

15. AABB x aabb F1: AaBb = ok F2: A-B- = ok A-bb = no aaB- = no aabb = ok

16. Species and Speciation I. Species Concepts II. Recognizing Species III. Making Species - Reproductive Isolation IV. Speciation

17. Speciation Speciation is not a goal, or a selective product of adaptation. It is simply a consequence of genetic changes that occurred for other reasons (selection, drift, mutation, etc.).

18. Speciation I. Modes:

19. Speciation I. Modes: A. Allopatric: Divergence in geographically separate populations - Vicariance - range divided by new geographic feature A BC

21. Almost all most recent divergence events date to 3 my, and separate species on either side of the isthmus

22. Speciation I. Modes: A. Allopatric: Divergence in geographically separate populations - Vicariance - range divided by new geographic feature - Peripatric - divergence of a small migrant population A B

23. Abert’s SquirrelKaibab Squirrel Crossed grand canyon to the north during Ice Age and isolated.

24. Speciation I. Modes: A. Allopatric: Divergence in geographically separate populations - Vicariance - range divided by new geographic feature - Peripatric - divergence of a small migrant population B. Parapatric - neighboring populations diverge, even with gene flow

25. Speciation I. Modes: A. Allopatric: Divergence in geographically separate populations - Vicariance - range divided by new geographic feature - Peripatric - divergence of a small migrant population B. Parapatric - neighboring populations diverge, even with gene flow

26. Hybrid Hybrid Backcross??

27. Speciation I. Modes: A. Allopatric: Divergence in geographically separate populations - Vicariance - range divided by new geographic feature - Peripatric - divergence of a small migrant population B. Parapatric - neighboring populations diverge, even with gene flow C. Sympatric: Divergence within a single population

28. Maynard Smith (1966) - hypothesized this was possible if there was disruptive selection within a population - perhaps as a specialist herbivore/parasite colonized and adapted to a new host.

29. C. Sympatric: Divergence within a single population Maynard Smith (1966) - hypothesized this was possible if there was disruptive selection within a population - perhaps as a specialist herbivore/parasite colonized and adapted to a new host. Example: Hawthorn/Apple Maggot Fly (Rhagoletis pomonella) Hawthorn maggot fly is a native species that breeds on Hawthorn (Crataegus sp.)

30. C. Sympatric: Divergence within a single population Maynard Smith (1966) - hypothesized this was possible if there was disruptive selection within a population - perhaps as a specialist herbivore/parasite colonized and adapted to a new host. Example: Hawthorn/Apple Maggot Fly (Rhagoletis pomonella) Europeans brought apples to North America. They are in the same plant family (Rosaceae) as Hawthorn.

31. C. Sympatric: Divergence within a single population Maynard Smith (1966) - hypothesized this was possible if there was disruptive selection within a population - perhaps as a specialist herbivore/parasite colonized and adapted to a new host. Example: Hawthorn/Apple Maggot Fly (Rhagoletis pomonella) Europeans brought apples to North America. They are in the same plant family (Rosaceae) as Hawthorn. In 1864, apple growers noticed infestation by Apple Maggot flies...which were actually just "hawthorn flies"...

32. C. Sympatric: Divergence within a single population Maynard Smith (1966) - hypothesized this was possible if there was disruptive selection within a population - perhaps as a specialist herbivore/parasite colonized and adapted to a new host. Example: Hawthorn/Apple Maggot Fly (Rhagoletis pomonella) races breed on their own host plant, and have adapted to the different seasons of fruit ripening. Only a 4-6% hybridization rate. Temporal, not geographic, isolation.

33. C. Sympatric: Divergence within a single population But can a generalist speciate sympatrically? Tauber and Tauber. 1977a and 1977b. Science. Two species of green lacewings - generalist insect predators Chrysopa downesi has one generation in early spring C. carnea breeds and has three generations in summer

34. C. Sympatric: Divergence within a single population But can a generalist speciate sympatrically? Tauber and Tauber. 1977a and 1977b. Science. Two species of green lacewings - generalist insect predators Chrysopa downesi has one generation in early spring, then diapause C. carnea breeds has three generations in summer, no diapause The differences are due to responses to photoperiod C. downesi stops reproducing and goes into diapause under long day length (summer), whereas C. carnea reproduces under long day length.

35. C. Sympatric: Divergence within a single population But can a generalist speciate sympatrically? Tauber and Tauber. 1977a. Science 197:592. The species are completely interfertile in the lab: Did reciprocal matings: C. downesi x C. carea Reared F1 offspring under long day length (16L:8D). Found all F1 did not enter diapause (C. carnea photoperiod response is dominant).

36. C. Sympatric: Divergence within a single population But can a generalist speciate sympatrically? Tauber and Tauber. 1977a. Science 197:592. Did F1 x F1 cross: Found 7% (~1/16) of F2 exhibited diapause at 16L:8D. This is consistent with a model of 2 independently assorting autosomal genes with complete dominance at each and an additive effect. AABBx aabb F1all A-B- phenotype F2A-B- = 9/16 A-bb = 3/16 aaB- = 3/16 aabb = 1/16.... ~ 7% C. carnea photoperiod C. downesi photoperiod

37. C. Sympatric: Divergence within a single population But can a generalist speciate sympatrically? Tauber and Tauber. 1977a. Science 197:592. F1 x C. downesi backcross had 3:1 ratio, as expected of model. AaBb x aabb AaBb =.25 Aabb =.25 aaBb =.25 aabb =.25 C. carnea photoperiod C. downesi photoperiod

38. C. Sympatric: Divergence within a single population But can a generalist speciate sympatrically? Tauber and Tauber. 1977b. Science 197:1298. How did this temporal separation get established? C. downesi is dark green and prefers hemlock forests C. carnea is light green and prefers fields and meadows Difference governed by a single locus where dark is incompletely dominant.

39. C. Sympatric: Divergence within a single population But can a generalist speciate sympatrically? Tauber and Tauber. 1977b. Science 197:1298. How did this temporal separation get established? C. downesi is dark green and prefers hemlock forests C. carnea is light green and prefers fields and meadows Difference governed by a single locus where dark is incompletely dominant. Hypothesize that selection for different morphs in different habitats created the stable dimorphism, reinforced by inbreeding within the habitats. intermediate heterozygote

40. C. Sympatric: Divergence within a single population But can a generalist speciate sympatrically? Tauber and Tauber. 1977b. Science 197:1298. How did this temporal separation get established? C. downesi is dark green and prefers hemlock forests C. carnea is light green and prefers fields and meadows Difference governed by a single locus where dark is incompletely dominant. Hypothesize that selection for different morphs in different habitats created the stable dimorphism, reinforced by inbreeding within the habitats. Selection then favored early breeding in C. downesi, as that is when insects feeding on conifers are most abundant.

41. Speciation I. Modes II. Mechanisms

42. Speciation I. Modes II. Mechanisms A. Progressive Genomic Incompatibility

43. Tilley et al. 1990. PNAS. Desmognathus ochrophaeus in western NC 1. correlation between geographic distance and genetic distance

44. Tilley et al. 1990. PNAS. Desmognathus ochrophaeus in western NC 2. Placed sympatric and allopatric males and females (reciprocal mating design) together for an evening and examined the cloaca of female in the morning for presence of sperm packet. Calculated "Coefficient of Isolation": (sum of % of sympatric matings) - (sum of % of allopatric matings) 2 = total isolation by sexual selection 0 = no differentiation by sexual selection

45. Speciation I. Modes II. Mechanisms A. Progressive Genomic Incompatibility B. Hybrid Incompatibility - Dobzhansky and Müller (1930's) Pairs of genes that work together diverge in different populations

46. Speciation I. Modes II. Mechanisms A. Progressive Genomic Incompatibility B. Hybrid Incompatibility - Dobzhansky and Müller (1930's) Pairs of genes that work together diverge in different populations A1A1 B1B1 A 1 A 1 B 2 B 2 works A 2 A 2 B 1 B 1 works A 2 A 2 B 2 B 2 works A 1 A 1 B 1 B 1 lethal

47. B. Hybrid Incompatibility D. melanogaster and D. simulans

48. B. Hybrid Incompatibility D. melanogaster and D. simulans Cross female D. mel. x male D. sim - no sons

49. B. Hybrid Incompatibility D. melanogaster and D. simulans Cross female D. mel. x male D. sim - no sons - Watanabe - 1970 - isolated a mutant strain of D. simulans (w) that could make males with D. melanogaster....

50. B. Hybrid Incompatibility D. melanogaster and D. simulans Cross female D. mel. x male D. sim - no sons - Watanabe - 1970 - isolated a mutant strain of D. simulans (w) that could make males with D. melanogaster.... - Hypothesized that this strain had a mutant gene partner that reestablished function with the D. melanogaster partner gene... called it "lethal hybrid rescue" (lhr).

51. B. Hybrid Incompatibility D. melanogaster and D. simulans Cross female D. mel. x male D. sim - no sons - Watanabe - 1970 - isolated a mutant strain of D. simulans (w) that could make males with D. melanogaster.... - Hypothesized that this strain had a mutant gene partner that reestablished function with the D. melanogaster partner gene... called it "lethal hybrid rescue" (lhr). - Ashburner - 1980 - isolated a mutant strain of D. melanogaster (a) females that could breed with D. simulans males and produce sons...called it "hybrid male rescue" - hmr - X-linked

52. B. Hybrid Incompatibility D. melanogaster and D. simulans SYSTEM: (s-lhr dominant) Ancestor: lhr, mhr Male D. simulans: s-lhr, mhrFemale D. melanogaster: lhr, m-mhr(X) s-lhr/lhr, m-mhr(X) = INVIABLE SONS

53. B. Hybrid Incompatibility D. melanogaster and D. simulans SYSTEM: (s-lhr dominant) D. sim = s-lhr, hmr (X) x D. mel = lhr, m-hmr (X) SONS GET : s-lhr/lhr, m-hmr/Y (only X).... INVIABLE

54. B. Hybrid Incompatibility D. melanogaster and D. simulans SYSTEM: D. sim = s-lhr, hmr (X) x D. mel = lhr, m-hmr (X) SONS GET : s-lhr/lhr, m-hmr (only X).... INVIABLE (w)D. sim = lhr/s-lhr, hmr (X) x D. mel = lhr, m-hmr (X) 1/2 SONS GET lhr/lhr, m-hmr (ONLY X) = VIABLE

55. B. Hybrid Incompatibility D. melanogaster and D. simulans SYSTEM: D. sim = s-lhr, hmr (X) x D. mel = lhr, m-hmr (X) SONS GET : s-lhr/lhr, m-hmr (only X).... INVIABLE (w)D. sim = lhr/s-lhr, hmr (X) x D. mel = lhr, m-hmr (X) 1/2 SONS GET lhr/lhr, m-hmr (ONLY X) = VIABLE D. sim = s-lhr, hmr (X) x (a) D. mel = lhr, m-hmr(X)/hmr (X) 1/2 SONS GET: s-lhr/lhr, hmr (only X) = VIABLE

56. B. Hybrid Incompatibility D. melanogaster and D. simulans SYSTEM: (s-lhr dominant) Ancestor: lhr, mhr D. simulans: s-lhr, mhrD. melanogaster: lhr, m-mhr s-lhr, m-mhr = INVIABLE

57. B. Hybrid Incompatibility D. melanogaster and D. simulans Brideau et al. 2006. Science 314: 1292-1295 - isolated location of lhr gene. - put NORMAL D. simulans gene into D. melanogaster. - mated these D. melanogaster with Watanabe's mutant strain of D. simulans. - IF these two genes are partners, then 3/4 hybrids should die. (w) D. sim = lhr/s-lhr, hmr (X) x (b)D. mel = s-lhr/lhr, m-hmr (X) (doesn't die....) 1/4 SONS GET : lhr/lhr, m-hmr (only X).... VIABLE 3/4 get some other combination including s-lhr and m-hmr.. INVIABLE

58. Speciation I. Modes II. Mechanisms A. Progressive Genomic Incompatibility B. Hybrid Incompatibility C. Differential Selection

59. C. Differential Selection - Assumed to be primary, but few studies documenting that reproductive isolation of phenotypes correlates with fitness differential in different environments. Rundle et al. (2000). Science 287:306.

60. C. Differential Selection - Assumed to be primary, but few studies documenting that reproductive isolation of phenotypes correlates with fitness differential in different environments. Rundle et al. (2000). Science 287:306. Sticklebacks colonizing lakes...PHYLOGENY: benthic limnetic

61. C. Differential Selection - Assumed to be primary, but few studies documenting that reproductive isolation of phenotypes correlates with fitness differential in different environments. Rundle et al. (2000). Science 287:306. Mate selection correlates with ecotype, not with genetic relatedness.... example of parallel evolution, too.

62. Speciation I. Modes II. Mechanisms A. Progressive Genomic Incompatibility B. Hybrid Incompatibility C. Differential Selection D. Hybridization

63. D. Hybridization - When hybridization occurs, it show increase gene flow between populations. How are hybrids stabilized as a reproductively isolated group?

64. - adaptation to an extreme habitat Gompert et al. 2006. Science 314: 1923.

65. - adaptation to an extreme habitat Gompert et al. 2006. Science 314: 1923. Two species of small western butterflies have overlapping ranges.

66. - adaptation to an extreme habitat Gompert et al. 2006. Science 314: 1923. Two cluster Three cluster Probabilities of assigning individuals from these populations to a particular dendrogram "cluster"

67. - adaptation to an extreme habitat Gompert et al. 2006. Science 314: 1923. Two cluster Three cluster Probabilities of assigning individuals from these populations to a particular dendrogram "cluster" Are the alpine populations simply in hybrid zone, or are they reproductively isolated?

68. - adaptation to an extreme habitat Gompert et al. 2006. Science 314: 1923. Two cluster Three cluster Probabilities of assigning individuals from these populations to a particular dendrogram "cluster" Are the alpine populations simply in hybrid zone, or are they reproductively isolated? They are fixed for several alleles, suggesting no gene flow.

69. - adaptation to an extreme habitat Gompert et al. 2006. Science 314: 1923. Two cluster Three cluster Probabilities of assigning individuals from these populations to a particular dendrogram "cluster" Are the alpine populations simply in hybrid zone, or are they reproductively isolated? They are fixed for several alleles, suggesting no gene flow. - Also used coalescence to estimate time since a common ancestor within each 'species". The alpine populations had a more recent history (400,000 yrs) than either of the others (1.2-1.9 my)

70. - adaptation to an extreme habitat Gompert et al. 2006. Science 314: 1923. - What maintains this genetic uniqueness?

71. - adaptation to an extreme habitat Gompert et al. 2006. Science 314: 1923. - What maintains this genetic uniqueness? Fidelity to Host Plant

72. - adaptation to an extreme habitat Gompert et al. 2006. Science 314: 1923. - What maintains this genetic uniqueness? Fidelity to Host Plant Also, their eggs don't stick to the leaf; they drop off into litter. This may be adaptive, as winds blow leaves a long way from original plant at high elevations. The host plant is a perennial, so dropping into the leaf litter keeps it close to host plant. Other species, even if they used the plant, would have eggs dispersed from the host plant. That's bad for butterflies, 'cuz caterpillars don't disperse too far...

73. D. Hybridization - When hybridization occurs, it show increase gene flow between populations. How are hybrids stabilized as a reproductively isolated group? - adaptation to extreme habitat - sexual selection

74. Mavarez et al. 2006. Nature 441:868

75. X BACKCROSS

76. H. melH. heurH. cyn H. mel1.000.070.18 H. heur0.101.000.44 H. cyn0.120.021.00 Mating probabilities in no-choice experiments: strong Positive Assortative Mating Male female

77. Mate Pairing in Tetrads: strong Positive Assortative Mating

78. Speciation I. Modes II. Mechanisms A. Progressive Genomic Incompatibility B. Hybrid Incompatibility C. Differential Selection D. Hybridization Several ways that new gene combinations can form and become stabilized.

80. (C) The distribution across markers of the proportion of H. petiolaris alleles seen in experimental hybrids. There were three generations of crossing within the hybrid population, followed by two generations of backcrossing to H. annuus. Therefore, in the absence of selection, one expects 1/8 of the genes to derive from H. petiolaris, with a distribution concentrated in the 1– 25% class. In regions of genome with the same gene order in H. petiolaris and H. annuus (red ), most markers fail to introgress, but some introgress more than expected. In regions of genome that differ in gene order as a result of chromosome rearrangements, there is almost no introgression (blue). (D) Patterns of introgression along the genomes are similar between experimental hybrids and the natural hybrid species, H. anomalus. Three of the 17 H. anomalus chromosomes are shown. The letters to the left (R, S, T, Q) indicate homology of these chromosomes to regions of the parental genomes. (The leftmost chromosome is rearranged, and combines linkage blocks R and S.) Arrows to the right indicate the genetic markers. The shading indicates the likelihood that the regions derived from H. annuus (blue) or H. petiolaris (yellow). (A, Courtesy USDA; B, redrawn from Rogers et al. 1982; C, data from Table 1 in Rieseberg et al. 1995a; D, redrawn from Fig. 3 in Rieseberg and Noyes 1998.)Rogers et al. 1982Rieseberg et al. 1995aRieseberg and Noyes 1998