Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Overview of Disparate Impact Claims Facially neutral policy or practice Adversely impacts a class protected by the Fair Housing Act Without a legitimate.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Overview of Disparate Impact Claims Facially neutral policy or practice Adversely impacts a class protected by the Fair Housing Act Without a legitimate."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Overview of Disparate Impact Claims Facially neutral policy or practice Adversely impacts a class protected by the Fair Housing Act Without a legitimate justification Despite the availability of less discriminatory alternatives

3 Two Kinds of Cases Pricing or denial cases challenging the treatment of applicants Policy cases challenging access to credit

4 Evidence of Pricing or Denial Disparities HMDA data publically available today HMDA data publically available under reforms Information available to HUD/DOJ o Additional HMDA fields & Federal Reserve outlier list o HAMP data o FHA loan data o HERA section 1128 data on interest rate disparities

5 Impact of Pricing and Denials Impact upon similarly-situated (similarly-credit-worthy) borrowers Underwriting factors may explain some disparities Impacts o U. S. v. AIG/WFI complaint: Alleges black borrowers charged total broker fees 20 basis points higher on average than white borrowers o HUD v. MortgageIT complaint: Alleges black and Hispanic borrowers charged APRs on average 6 to 14 basis points more and approximately $1000 more in fees than similarly-situated white borrowers o HUD v. Quicken Loans complaint: Alleges that, compared with similarly-situated white applicants, black applicants experienced 2% to 5% higher denial rates and Hispanic applicants experienced 2% to 4% higher denial rates

6 Impact of Policies Underwriting exclusions or limitations (e.g., row- houses, Native American lands) Lack of data on denials or borrowers subject to policies Census or other data on affected population

7 Legitimate Justification Lenders make decisions based on risk of default (safety & soundness) Requires proof Proof can’t be hypothetical or speculative

8 Less Discriminatory Alternatives Unlimited discretion may be addressed by guidelines and/or caps A lender’s later adoption of reforms may demonstrate available alternatives You need to understand the business in order to understand the alternatives

9 Contact information Tim Lambert HUD, Office of General Counsel Timothy.C.Lambert@hud.gov


Download ppt "Overview of Disparate Impact Claims Facially neutral policy or practice Adversely impacts a class protected by the Fair Housing Act Without a legitimate."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google