Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior."— Presentation transcript:

1 Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior

2 2 In everyday language the term theory is used loosely to refer to a wide range of concepts A scientific theory Goes beyond a simple hypothesis Deals with potentially verifiable phenomena Is highly ordered and structured A theory is a partially verified statement of a scientific relationship that cannot be directly observed

3 3 Theory vs. hypothesis Two concepts often confused Theory is more complex (multiple variables) A hypothesis is more simple (one variable) Theory vs. law A law is a theory that has been substantially verified empirically Theory vs. model Model often used as a synonym for theory A model may be a specific implementation of a general theory A model may represent an application of a general theory to a specific situation A computer model is a program that defines variables and how the variables change over time or trials

4 4 Mechanistic explanation Describes mechanisms underlying behavior Describes how behavior works Functional explanation Describes an attribute in terms of its function e.g., beauty functions to attract a mate Describes why behavior exists Mechanistic explanations are preferred

5 5 Quantitative Theory Theory expressed in mathematical terms Relates numerical values of variables to one another Predicted outcomes expressed numerically Qualitative Theory Theory that states relationships between variables in verbal rather than mathematical terms

6 6 Descriptive Theory Theory that merely describes the relationships among variables Weakest form of explanation Analogical Theory Theory that explains the relationships among variables through analogy to some well- understood model Analogies can be taken just so far Can provide conceptual organization for data and predict unexpected relationships

7 7 Fundamental Theory Theory that proposes a new structure to explain the relationships among variables Highest level of theory Uncommon in psychology

8 8 The domain (scope) of a theory is the range of situations to which the theory may be legitimately applied Can be wide or narrow Chance of dealing adequately with a range of phenomena are better for a small area of behavior than for a large area Concepts invented to deal with one area may have no relationship to those invented to deal with others

9 9 Understanding Highest role in science Theory helps you understand phenomena better Prediction Theory provides predictions about behavior under varying circumstances Predictions are tested empirically

10 10 Organizing and Interpreting Research Results A theory provides a framework for understanding research Research results can be interpreted based on a theory Generating Research A theory is a source for new research ideas Known as the heuristic value of a theory A theory can be wrong, but still have heuristic value

11 11 Ability to Account for Data Theory must account for existing data and well-established facts within its domain Explanatory Relevance Theoretical explanation must offer good grounds for believing that the phenomenon would occur under specified conditions Testability A theory must be testable. It must be capable of failing some empirical test.

12 12 Prediction of Novel Events A theory should predict phenomena that the theory was not specifically designed to account for but that are within its domain Parsimony A theory should explain phenomena within its domain with the fewest possible assumptions

13 13 Confirmational Strategy Look for evidence to confirm predictions from a theory Important part of theory testing, but has limits Confirmation does not prove a theory is correct Confirmation may occur when predictions are too loosely defined Disconfirmational Strategy Using a positive research result to disconfirm a theory’s predictions The two strategies should be used together to test theories

14 14 Strong Inference Theory is tested and modified based on outcome of research and then tested again Cycle of testing and modification continues until theory adequately accounts for behavior Several alternative explanations can be tested with an experiment Some alternatives will be ruled out New experiment tests remaining alternatives Strong inference works only when alternative explanations generate well-defined predictions

15 15 The quest for theories of learning once drove psychological research Learning theories became very complex Researchers began to question whether the time was right for grand theories Some researchers (e.g., Skinner) argued for an atheoretical approach to research Research should focus on functional relationships among variables


Download ppt "Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google