1. Addressing the gender challenge- Part II: IASC Gender Marker Results & Lessons Learned IASC CAP Sub Working Group

2. Sex matters Tsunami: 4 female for every 1 male death 2

3. MEASURING THE ISSUE: THE HUMANITARIAN LEXICON Displaced Returnees Households Communities Vulnerables Children below 5 Survivors…

4. IASC Gender Marker Coding  To measure/track inclusion of gender and GBV  To enable/to build capacity of humanitarian teams to build the capacity of humanitarian teams to design projects that respond to the distinct needs of ALL beneficiaries Gender CodeDescription Gender Code 0 (UNDP code 0) Gender is not reflected anywhere in the project sheet i.e gender-blind Gender Code 1 (UNDO code 1) The project includes gender equality in a limited way Gender Code 2a Gender Mainstreaming (UNDP code 2) A gender analysis is included in the project’s needs assessment. This gender analysis is reflected in the project’s activities and outcomes. Gender Code 2b Targeted Actions (UNDP code 3) The project’s principal purpose is to advance gender equality.

5. Overview – GM to Date  GM piloted 2009, 12 countries in 2010  20 countries 2012. Fully integrated into 16 CAPs 2012 5 Pooled Funds (PF)/ER Pakistan  Support from GenCap Advisers Capacity development in-country HQ review process

6. RESULTS: CAP 2010-2012 (Baseline) Kenya, Niger, oPt, Somalia, Yemen, Zimbabwe

7. RESULTS: CAP 2010-2012 Kenya, Niger, oPt, Somalia, Yemen, Zimbabwe

8. RESULTS: Clusters/16 CAPs in 2012

9. RESULTS – GM 16 CAP Countries 2012

10. Key Emerging Issues…  From the abstract to the practical  Space for dialogue and engagement  Donor engagement  Gender = women?  Sex-and-age disaggregated data (SADD)  Collection and use?

11. ….Key Emerging Issues & Going forward  Targeting the ‘right’ people for training ( designers/implementers, national actors)  Gender minimum standards/commitments  GM as a ‘Criteria’ - quality of projects  Consistency in coding: more engagement by designers & clusters

12. ….Key Emerging Issues & Going forward (ctd)  Distinguishing between 2a & 2b projects  15% target on 2b (Protection & Multi-sector only)?  More funding towards 2b/esp. GBV projects  From design to monitoring implementation :  South Sudan/Yemen/Zimbabwe = initial steps  MYRs = entry point

13. THANK YOU