Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTracey Lawrence Modified over 8 years ago
1
MAY 17, 2013 POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING Stark-Tuscarawas-Wayne Recycling District
2
ROLL CALL
3
APPROVE MAY 17, 2013 POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA
4
1.Roll Call 2.Approve May 17, 2013 Policy Committee Meeting Agenda 3.Approve March 15, 2013 Policy Committee Meeting Minutes 4.District Plan Compliance: Goal #1 & Goal #2 5.Review Section VIII: Cost of Financing Plan Implementation 6.Review Section V: Planning Period Projections and Strategies 7.Section VI: Methods of Management: Facilities and Programs to be Used 8.Section VII: Measurement of Progress Towards Waste Reduction Goals 9.Other Business 10.Adjournment Board of Director’s STARK Thomas Bernabei Janet Weir Creighton Richard Regula TUSCARAWAS Chris Abbuhl Belle Everett Kerry Metzger WAYNE Jim Carmichael Ann Obrecht Scott Wiggam Policy Committee Meeting Agenda May 17, 2013
5
APPROVE MARCH 15, 2013 POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
6
DISTRICT PLAN COMPLIANCE: GOAL #1 & GOAL #2
7
State Goals 1.Access to Alternate Waste Management Opportunities 2.Waste Reduction and Recycling Rates 3.Source Reduction 4.Technical and Information Assistance 5.Restricted Wastes and Household Hazardous Waste 6.Economic Incentive Analysis 7.Market Development Strategy (Optional) 8.Reporting Goal #1 and Goal #2 – District’s must develop strategies to meet Goal #1 or Goal #2. However, the Ohio EPA encourages District’s to meet both of these goals.
9
Recycling Access Rates Residential/ Commercial IndustrialExemptTotal Adjusted DisposalTons PPPD 490,745 4.61 Tons PPPD 358,609 3.37 Tons PPPD 51,362 0.48 Tons PPPD 900,716 8.47 RecyclingTons % 117,855 19.36 Tons % 911,668 71.77 Tons % 1 1,029,523 54.79 Waste Generation (Disposal & Recycling) Tons PPPD 608,600 5.72 Tons PPPD 1,270,277 11.95 Tons PPPD 51,362 0.48 Tons PPPD 1,930,239 18.15 PPPD = Pounds Per Person Per Day 1 Exempt waste has been excluded from the industrial recycling rate calculation. 2011 Annual District Report Recycling Rates Stark County99% Tuscarawas County106% Wayne County120% District Residential Recycling Access Rates
10
REVIEW SECTION VIII: COST OF FINANCING PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
11
Review Section VIII: Cost of Financing Plan Implementation A.Funding Mechanisms B.Cost of Plan Implementation C.Funds Allocated from ORC 3734.57(B), ORC 3734.572 and ORC 3734.573 D.Contingent Funding E.Summary of Costs and Revenues
12
REVIEW SECTION V: PLANNING PERIOD PROJECTIONS AND STRATEGIES
13
Review Section V: Planning Period Projections and Strategies A.Planning Period B.Population Projections C.Waste Generation Projections D.Projections for Waste Stream Composition E.Waste Reduction and Recycling Strategies through the Planning Period
14
SECTION VI: METHODS OF MANAGEMENT: FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS TO BE USED
15
Section VI: Methods of Management: Facilities and Programs to be Used (To be reviewed at the July 19, 2013 Policy Committee Meeting) A.District Methods for Management of Solid Waste B.Demonstration of Access to Capacity C.Schedule for Facilities and Programs: New, Expansions, Closures, Continuations D.Identification and Designation of Facilities E.Authorization Statement to Designate F.Waiver Process for the Use of Undesignated Facilities G.Siting Strategy for Facilities H.Contingencies for Capacity Assurance and District Program Implementation
16
SECTION VII: MEASUREMENT OF PROGRESS TOWARD WASTE REDUCTION GOAL'S
17
Section VII: Measurement of Progress Toward Waste Reduction Goals (To be reviewed at the July 19, 2013 Policy Committee Meeting) A.Compliance with Goal #1 B.Demonstration of Compliance with Goal #1 C.Target for Reduction and Recycling
18
OTHER BUSINESS
19
ADJOURNMENT Next Policy Committee Meeting: July 19, 2013 @ 9:30am
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.