Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCharlotte Miles Modified over 9 years ago
1
Session 10: The ISPD2005 Placement Contest
2
2 Outline Benchmark & Contest Introduction Individual placement presentation FastPlace, Capo, mPL, FengShui, APlace, NTUPlace, mFAR, Kraftwerk&Domino, Dragon2005 Result Announcement Conclusion & Future Work
3
The ISPD2005 Placement Contest and Benchmark Suite Gi-Joon Nam, Charles J. Alpert, Paul G. Villarrubia, Bruce Winter and Mehmet Yildiz IBM Corp.
4
4 ISPD 2005 Placement Benchmark Suite Name#Objs#Movs#Fixed#Nets #Total Pins #Pins from M #Pins from F Peri. IOs Dens- ity% adaptec1211K2109045432211429440539235132054048075.71 adaptec2255K254457566266009106948210456992378340778.59 adaptec3452K4509277234667581875039184385231187074.53 adaptec4496K49471613295159511912420187656335857062.67 bigblue1278K277604560284479114469111318561283552854.19 bigblue2558K5347822308457723521222821979597142685061.80 bigblue31097K1095519129311231703833218379010743111085.65 bigblue42177K21691838170222988689000788710667189411065.30
5
5 ISPD 2005 Placement Benchmark Suite
6
6
7
7 Real industrial ASIC designs Free space 54% - 85% Affects wire-length significantly Macros Wider distribution of cell sizes I/Os: perimeter and area array I/Os Various row configuration Clock logic included
8
8 ISPD 2005 Placement Contest Open contest primarily for academic physical design community Covers majority of placement tools FastPlace, Capo, mPL, FengShui, APlace, NTUPlace, mFAR, Kraftwerk&Domino, Dragon2005 Goals To provide new modern placement benchmarks To encourage to expose placement tools and results To provide an educational forum on the state-of-the- art placement algorithms
9
9 Contest Format Each team is given 5 days to come up with the best results they can get Fixed window of time No limit on CPU resources Quality metrics Legality Half-perimeter bounding box wire length No timing metric No congestion metric
10
10 Contest Timeline Jan. 12: Sample benchmarks released Mar. 20: Contest benchmarks posted Mar. 25: Solution submission due Apr. 6: Results announcement
11
11 Outline Benchmark & Contest Introduction Individual placement presentation FastPlace, Capo, mPL, FengShui, APlace, NTUPlace, mFAR, Kraftwerk&Domino, Dragon2005 Result Announcement Conclusion & Future Work
12
12 Wire-Length Results adaptec2adaptec4bigblue1bigblue2bigblue3bigblue4 Ratio APlace 87.31187.6594.64143.82357.89833.21 1.00 mFAR 91.53190.8497.70168.70379.95876.28 1.06 dragon 94.72200.88102.39159.71380.45903.96 1.08 mPL 97.11200.9498.31173.22369.66904.19 1.09 FastP 107.86204.48101.56169.89458.49889.87 1.16 Capo 99.71211.25108.21172.30382.631098.76 1.17 NTUP 100.31206.45106.54190.66411.811154.15 1.21 fs50 122.99337.22114.57285.43471.151040.05 1.50 K&D 157.65352.01149.44322.22656.191403.79 1.84
13
13 Conclusions & Future Works New placement benchmark suite ISPD2005 ISPD2005 Placement Contest Better quality metrics for future contest Routability & congestion
14
14 adaptec2 Layout Figures
15
15 adaptec2 Layout Figures
16
16 adaptec2 Layout Figures
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.