Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Sea Mine Warfare: An Assessment Update 23-26 July 2001 RDML M. A. Sharp, Program Executive Officer.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Sea Mine Warfare: An Assessment Update 23-26 July 2001 RDML M. A. Sharp, Program Executive Officer."— Presentation transcript:

1 Sea Mine Warfare: An Assessment Update 23-26 July 2001 RDML M. A. Sharp, Program Executive Officer

2 July 20012 PMS490 PMS210 PMSNSW PMSMDS PMSEOD RMS MCM 1 Class MHC 51 Class CLOSED LOOP DEGAUSSING ZODIAC F-470 PEO-MUW VSW MCM REMOTE ORDNANCE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEM ASSAULT BREACHING MCS 12 MARINE MAMMAL SYSTEM ICWS ALMDS AN/AQS-14 AN/ALQ-141 AN/AQS-20 PMS411 PMS403 SQQ-34(V)CV-TSC EMATT/MK 30 Targets DD-21 AN/SQQ-89(V) LMRS Program Executive Office Mine and Undersea Warfare

3 July 20013 PEO Top Four Create a Navy Plan for Battle Space Dominance Under-the-Sea Determine the Way Ahead for Naval Mining Conduct End-to-End Assessment of Organic Mine Counter Measures Capability Dedicated MIW Forces Roadmap to the Navy after Next

4 SHALLOW MEDIUM DEEP Current Mining Capability No Requirement MK 56 MK 65/63/62 QUICKSTRIKE MK 67 SLMM QS & SLMM 150 fsw600 fsw MK 60 CAPTOR

5 July 20015 Current Status of USN Mines Quickstrike Mk 62/63/65 –Support for older Mods fully funded –Mod 3 procurement initiated this fiscal year –Air platform integration and algorithm development above core Submarine Launched Mobile Mine (SLMM) Mk 67 –Demil/Disposal directed by PR99 –Retention directed by POM02 SPP –Limited support until maintenance is reestablished in FY04 –Out of Service by 2010 Mine Mk 56 –Demil/Disposal directed by PR99 –Retention of contingency quantity directed by POM02 SPP –Minimal support for safety issues only –Out of Service by 2010 Encapsulated Torpedo (CAPTOR) Mk 60 –Demil/Disposal directed by PR99 –Out of service by end of this fiscal year –Some components retained for possible future mines developments

6 SHALLOW MEDIUM DEEP Mining Capability Beyond 2010 No Requirement No Capability MK 65/63/62 QuickStrike 150 fsw600 fsw

7 July 20017 Year 2010 Problem Limited Inventory-Shallow or Medium (Bottom) Water Only No Medium (Moored) or Deep Capability No Covert Mining Capability Infrastructure Atrophy –Reduced budget –No New development Planned or Programmed –U. S. Navy Core Competency Threatened with Extinction

8 July 20018 US Naval Mines Inventory

9 Mining Infrastructure S&T and Development Work Force Core Infrastructure = 36 WY Core Infrastructure S&T = 15 WY Dev = 21 WY Total = 36 WY Desert Storm

10 July 200110 Mine Node U.S. Mining Vision - Integrated Littoral Battlespace Dominance

11 July 200111 ‘Top 4’ – Organic MCM Will Organic MCM Systems satisfy the operational mine warfare requirements? Led by overarching IPT Composed of three separate but related IPTs –Analysis –Research –System Engineering IPTs composed of N7/N8/PEO MUW, SURFLANT, CMWC, CSS representatives Provided interim report mid June, final report NLT 30 September

12 July 200112 Objectives Determine the technical capabilities of complete suite of organic systems (seven) and C4I in a coordinated (net-centric) warfighting role –Requirements –CONOPS –Technical Performance Describe capabilities and shortfalls –Identify “holes,” issues, and recommendations Formulate alternatives to shortfalls Recommend solutions

13 July 200113 E2E Assessment Team CINCLANTFLTCMWCN752 PMA-299N763 N77 N78N742 nd FLT Executive Board Co-chairs CAPT Lambert (PMS 403) CAPT Jimenez (PMS 210) AnalysisResearchSystems Engineering Core Team Cells Review Panel CAPT Briggs (PMS 490) K. Haas (PMS 210) T. Stefanick (PMS 210)

14 July 200114 Assessment Process Integrate Concept of Operations and Employment AMCMLMRSRMS Integrate Concept of Operations and Employment AMCMLMRSRMS System Technical Parameters Probability of detection Probability of neutralization Endurance False alarm rate Other … System Technical Parameters Probability of detection Probability of neutralization Endurance False alarm rate Other … Assessment Methodology Measures of effectiveness Modeling Fleet expertise Review Panel Assessment Methodology Measures of effectiveness Modeling Fleet expertise Review Panel Communications / Data flow Baseline Scenario Development Threats TACSITs Environmen Asset Availability Baseline Scenario Development Threats TACSITs Environmen Asset Availability Identify Capabilities and Shortfalls Prioritize and Rank Recommendations MIW Operational Requirements MIW Operational Requirements

15 July 200115 ‘Top 4’ - Dedicated MIW Forces Roadmap to the Navy after Next MCM’s/MHC’s/New Payloads; –Plan for improvement not clear or funded. MCS Replacement –Valid need for dedicated ship? –Expected life of Inchon –Realistic plan for way ahead >Convert existing ship? >New Construction of a unique ship? >Build an additional ship of an existing class? MH-53 vs. MH-60

16 July 200116 ‘Top 4’ - Improving USW Battle Space Dominance Advancing USW as a concept that includes ASW and MUW Shallow water operations means we no longer have the luxury to keep ASW and MUW separate. Assured access requires an Undersea Warfare Approach.

17 July 200117

18 July 200118 ‘Top 4’ - Improving USW Battle Space Dominance USW ESG refocused Cross platform, leveraged efforts approach Eliminate program redundancies/stovepipes Capability and mission based Marries ASW and MUW to assure access Modified SUBTECH process IPTs to explore future technologies which could contribute to mission accomplishment Outcomes to affect FY02/03 execution and POM 04 planning

19 July 200119 Questions?

20 July 200120 Differences from Force 21 Scope of Force 21 included dedicated MCM, End to End (E2E) analysis addresses only organic E2E is a technical assessment addressing interoperability of the suite of systems vs. a strictly operational analysis End to End study addresses C4I to a much greater degree than Force 21 Level of analysis of individual system timelines more detailed in End to End study End to End study uses most recent system performance estimates, rather than notional estimates or ORD thresholds

21 July 200121 12 MHC-51 Class ships 2 Overseas Homeported 14 MCM-1 Class ships 4 Overseas Homeported Dedicated Forces 1 MCS-12 Class ship 2 AMCM Sqdns (20 A/C total) 4 FWD Deployed 72 Hr Deployment Contingency 15 EOD MCM dets 2 EOD Marine Mammal dets 1 Very Shallow Water (VSW) det 72 Hr Deployment Contingency An Integrated Force of Ships, Helicopters and Divers


Download ppt "Sea Mine Warfare: An Assessment Update 23-26 July 2001 RDML M. A. Sharp, Program Executive Officer."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google