Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison

2 2 A Global Initiative for an ILC International Committee for Future Accelerators (ICFA) representing major particle physics laboratories worldwide. Chose ILC accelerator technology (SCRF) Determined ILC physics design parameters Formed Global Design Effort and Mandate 2006

3 3 Technical design completed and reviewed (PAC Dec 2012). TDR completed. Value cost estimate of $7.6B based on TDR + 22.6M man-hrs of explicit labour (~$2B). Value estimate does not cover US specific cost elements such as escalation, contingency, pre-ops, etc. Generic site(s): flat terrain & mountainous Using “reasonable” assumptions, ~9 years from ground breaking to start of beam commissioning Technical Design Completed Dec 2012 Mike Harrison

4 ILC Schematic

5 Grooved Insert for CesrTA Wiggler Tunnels in the Japanese Mountains New Tunnel Shape

6 ILC Cost Breakdown

7 Global Design Effort 77 ILC Value – by Area Systems Conventional Facilities Components Main Cost Driver

8 SRF Linac Technology 8 Mike Harrison

9 SRF Linac Technology 1.3 GHz Nb 9-cellCavities16,024 Cryomodules1,855 SC quadrupole pkg673 10 MW MB Klystrons & modulators 426 / 461 * Approximately 20 years of R&D worldwide * site dependent 9 Mike Harrison

10 Cavity Production Yield

11 XFEL Cryomodule Cost breakdown 8 cavities + 1 sc quad –~12 m cryomodule Including testing –cavity vertical test –cryomodule pulsed test Testing –Assumes 100% DESY infrastructure –100% testing –second largest cost driver after sc cavities

12 Cryomodule Assembly EXFEL Cryomodule flow Fabrication Companies Testing at Host Lab - DESY

13 EXFEL Cavity Qualification at DESY 13

14 Coupler testing and processing: 14

15 EXFEL Cryomodule Fabrication 15

16 EXFEL Cryomodule Fabrication Information 16

17 EXFEL Cryomodule Database 17

18 EXFEL Cavity Qualification 2012-11-13 18

19 RF Power Source Marx modulator 10MW MB Klystron  Presentation by S. Fukuda Adjustable local power distribution system 19

20 SCRF Procurement/Manufacturing Model Regional hub-laboratories responsible to regional procurements to be open for any world-wide industry participation Regional Hub-Lab: E, & … Regional Hub-Lab: E, & … Regional Hub-Lab: A Regional Hub-Lab: A Regional Hub-Lab: B Regional Hub-Lab: B Regional Hub-Lab: D Regional Hub-Lab: D World-wide Industry responsible to ‘Build-to-Print’ manufacturing World-wide Industry responsible to ‘Build-to-Print’ manufacturing ILC Host-Lab Regional Hub-Lab: C: responsible to Hosting System Test and Gradient Performance Regional Hub-Lab: C: responsible to Hosting System Test and Gradient Performance Technical Coordination for Lab-Consortium Technical Coordination for Lab-Consortium : Technical coordination link : Procurement link A. Yamamoto: 2013.2.6 20 SCRF Cost Overview

21 A Model for Cavity and CM Production and Qualification Process Step hostedIndustryIndustry/Labo ratory Hub- laboratory ILC Host- laboratory Regional constraintnoyes or noyes Sub-comp/material - Production/Procurement Nb, Ti, specific comp. … Procurement 9-cell Cavity - Manufacturing 9-cell-cavity, Process, He-Jacketing Procurement 9-cell Cavity - Performance Test Cold, gradient test Cryomodule component - Manufacturing V. vessel, cold-mass... Procurement Cryomodule/Cavity - Assembly Cav-string/ CM-assembly SCRF Cryomodule - Perofrmance Test Cold, gradient test Accelerator integration, Commissioning Accelerator sys. Integ. A. Yamamoto: 2013.2.6 21 SCRF Cost Overview

22 Construction Schedule 22 Preparation  ~ 2 years Full production  3 ~ 6 years depending on component/material Installation  2 ~ 3 years (site dependent) (Mountain region)

23 23 5 GeV booster linac and damping ring locations A. Yamamoto: 2013.2.6 SCRF Cost Overview

24 24 A few other cryogenic devices A. Yamamoto: 2013.2.6 SCRF Cost Overview

25 The Linear Collider Collaboration 25 ICFA Linear Collider BoardProgram Advisory Committee Directorate – Lyn Evans Deputy (Physics) – Hitoshi Murayama ILC – Mike Harrison Physics & Detectors – Hitoshi Yamamoto CLIC – Steinar Stapnes The GDE will close-out TDR related business – formal end in June

26 26 Political

27 27 Political

28 28 Political

29 29 Science

30 30 Industry

31 31 Political

32 32 Technical focus will shift to cryomodules via the XFEL production Site specific conceptual design next step Value engineering on linac systems The US R&D program ends with the GDE. Awaits further development towards a project Japan seriously considering offering to host New global collaboration after the GDE. It contains all the linear collider activities, not just the ILC. Conclusions HEPAP Facilities Panel Feb 2013 Mike Harrison


Download ppt "1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google