Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Premature Dumps in 2011 Acknowledgements: A.Macpherson, G.Papotti, M.Zerlauth M.Albert LHC Beam Operation Workshop December 2011.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Premature Dumps in 2011 Acknowledgements: A.Macpherson, G.Papotti, M.Zerlauth M.Albert LHC Beam Operation Workshop December 2011."— Presentation transcript:

1 Premature Dumps in 2011 Acknowledgements: A.Macpherson, G.Papotti, M.Zerlauth M.Albert LHC Beam Operation Workshop December 2011

2 2 Outline Introduction Data extraction Dump statistics by mode Dump causes Dumps in STABLE BEAMS Summary

3 3 Introduction Every dump generating PM data is assessed by shift crew using PM Online tool. All beam dump characteristics are collected and stored in the PM Database. Dumps at 3.5 TeV are systematically reanalyzed by MPS experts. (M. Zerlauth, R. Schmidt, J. Wenninger) Analysis of PM data for p+ run: 19/02 (first beam) – 30/10/2011 (last dump) I B1 > 1e12 and I B2 > 1e12 (exclude probes, MPS tests)

4 4 PM Online Tool Classification & Assessment by OP

5 5 LHC Post Mortem Database URL: lhc-postmortem.cern.ch access to DB DB Query Query builder, Reports & Data download

6 6 All beam dumps by mode

7 7 Non-programmed dumps by mode Total: 375 (78%) Inj. problems: ~10 %

8 8 Beam dump causes E >= 3.49 TeV I B1 > 1e12 I B2 > 1e12 169263272 LBDS, PIC, BLM, BIC, SIS Orbit, BPM, Beam Loss, Collimator adjustments, BCM, Feedbacks 42% 71% 10% 79%

9 9 Beam dump causes by equipment E >= 3.49 TeV I B1 > 1e12 I B2 > 1e12 “TOP 5”: 77% of dumps in SB

10 10 Beam dump causes by beam monitoring E >= 3.49 TeV I B1 > 1e12 I B2 > 1e12

11 11 Systems which saved us… E >= 3.49 TeV I B1 > 1e12 I B2 > 1e12

12 12 STABLE BEAMS – often short !

13 13 Dumps in STABLE BEAMS SEUs by system Cryogenics: 16 QPS: 15 Coll System: 4 PC: 2 PIC: 1

14 14 Fill 1958 (S34)Fill 1996 (P8) Average: 4.6h Recovery after dump in SB

15 15 Proposals for improvements PM Online tool should offer re-editing (correction of wrongly assessed dumps) Include injection scheme in PM-Database Do we need to add more categories for dump classification? “Other” used for 11% of non-programmed dumps Should we also systematically analyse dumps at injection energy ?

16 16 Summary Beam dump causes due to equipment failures clearly dominate. 50% of all fills & “1380b – fills” last < 3h Average fill duration: ~5h 22% of STABLE BEAMS - fills were dumped by SEU effects, mainly on cryogenics and QPS equipment The average time from a beam dump in STABLE BEAMS to the next injection is ~4.5h.


Download ppt "Premature Dumps in 2011 Acknowledgements: A.Macpherson, G.Papotti, M.Zerlauth M.Albert LHC Beam Operation Workshop December 2011."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google