1. Strategies to Support Yellow-zone students Specialized Group-based Approach

2. Acknowledgements Rob Horner, Leanne Hawken, Rob March Fern Ridge Middle School, Clear Lake Elementary, Templeton Elementary, …

3. Purpose Develop specialized, group system for addressing needs of students with at-risk or significant problem behaviors

4. Prerequisites Effective & proactive SW system in place Team-based problem solving Local behavioral capacity –Functional assessment-based behavior support planning –Social skills programming –Behavioral interventions Administrator participation

6. Academic SystemsBehavioral Systems 1-5% 5-10% 80-90% Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success

7. Group-based Programming Requirements Targeted, individualized, small group interventions –based on functional behavioral assessment information –social skills instruction –behavioral programming –multiple opportunities for high rates of academic success

8. Daily behavioral monitoring –Self- and/or adult Regular, frequent opportunities for positive reinforcement –tangible to social –external to internal –predictable to unpredictable –frequent to infrequent Home-school connection

9. Other Strategies Behavioral contracts Adult mentor/monitor Targeted social skills instruction –problem solving –conflict management Self-management programming Academic restructuring

10. Example: Behavior Education Program (BEP) (March & Horner, 1998) Need –7% of students with chronic problem behavior –Targeted, group based intervention needed –Expected to work for most but not all students –Interventions must be functional assessment based ~24 students

11. BEP Features Students identified with multiple office referrals Student-parent-school contract formed Connection to school-wide expectations Individualized, daily monitoring

12. BEP Set-up Teach students, teachers, & parents routines Establish school & home reinforcers Establish data collection system Conduct abbreviated FBAs

13. BEP Daily Cycle 1. Check in office at arrival to school –reminder binder –precorrections –turn in previous days signed SM form –pick-up new SM form –review daily goals

14. BEP Daily Cycle 2. At each class –student completes SM card –teacher checks & initials 3. Check out at end of day –review days points & goals –receive reinforcer if goal met –take successful day card home –precorrections

15. BEP Daily Cycle 4. Give successful day card to parent(s) –receive reinforcer from parent –have parent sign card 5.Return signed card next day

16. Student Recommended for BEP BEP Implemented Parent Feedback Regular Teacher Feedback Afternoon Check-out Morning Check-in BEP Coordinator Summarizes Data For Decision Making Bi-weekly BEP Meeting to Assess Student Progress Exit Program Revise Program

17. Daily Progress Report

18. HAWK Report Date ________ Student _______________ Teacher___________________ 0 = No 1= Good 2= Excellent Be Safe Be Respectful Be Your Personal BestTeacher initials Keep hands, feet, and objects to self Use kind words and actions Follow directions Working in class Class 0 1 2 Recess 0 1 2 Class 0 1 2 Lunch 0 1 2 Class 0 1 2 Recess 0 1 2 Class 0 1 2 Total Points = Points Possible = 50 Today ______________% Goal ______________%

19. BEP Process (cont.) Bi-weekly Principal Recognition –e.g., school store coupon with graph attached Data shared with all staff at least quarterly 9-Week graph sent to parents

20. BEP Check-in/Check-Out Record Date:__________________BEP Coordinator:_________________ Check-In Check-Out Student NamePaperPencilNotebookBEP parent copy BEP Score Jason √√√√90 Leanne √√85 Juan √√√√60 Kiran √√100 Alexa √√√√95 Jacey √√√90

21. Tracking Student BEP Progress (number = % of total daily points) DateJasonLeanneJuanKiranAlexa 1/16/03 85951008065 1/17/03 100 7577 1/18/03 7701008563 1/19/03 4575959285 1/20/03 8889778990 1/23/03 79010095 1/24/03 95678510078

22. Daily Data Used for Decision Making

24. Critical Features of BEP Intervention is continuously available Rapid access to intervention (less than a week) Very low effort by teachers Positive System of Support –Students agree to participate Implemented by all staff/faculty in a school Flexible intervention based on assessment –Functional Assessment Adequate resources allocated (admin, team) –bi-weekly meeting, plus 10 hours a week Continuous monitoring for decision-making

25. BEP Readiness Checklist (Crone, Horner, Hawken, 2004) School-wide system of behavior support in place Staff buy-in for implementation of the BEP Administrative support –Time & money allocated No major changes in school climate –e.g. teacher strikes, administrative turnover, major changes in funding BEP implementation a top priority

26. Working with Schools Interested in Implementing the BEP Provide Overview of BEP to Behavior Team Provide Overview to all staff –Faculty vote 1-2 Professional development days for behavior team to develop BEP to fit school culture –See BEP Development & Implementation Guide (Hawken, 2004) for training content After BEP development, gather feedback from all staff on format/structure of BEP Ongoing coaching and feedback

27. Who is the BEP Appropriate for? APPROPRIATE –Low-level problem behavior (not severe) –3-7 referrals –Behavior occurs across multiple locations –Examples talking out minor disruption work completion INAPPROPRIATE –Serious or violent behaviors/ infractions –Extreme chronic behavior (8- 10+ referrals) –Require more individualized support FBA-BIP Wrap Around Services

28. Which Schools Would Benefit From Implementing a BEP? How many students does your school have in the range of 3-7 referrals? If > 10 students- BEP may be appropriate If < 10 students- implement individualized interventions The BEP should be able to reasonably maintain 15-30 students/year

29. Referrals per Student

30. Conduct Brief Functional Assessment Is the behavior maintained by escape from social interaction? Is the behavior related to lack of academic skills? Is the behavior maintained by peer attention Escape Motivated BEP Reduce adult interaction Use escape as a reinforcer BEP + Academic Support Increase academic support Peer Motivated BEP Allow student to earn reinforcers to share with peers

31. Big Ideas Schools need different systems to deal with different levels of problem behavior in schools. Targeted group interventions like the BEP are efficient systems for supporting students at-risk for more severe forms of problem behavior. Up to 30 students (depending on school size/resources) can be served using a targeted group intervention. Some students are going to need more intensive support than the BEP can provide.

32. Research Articles Hawken, L. S. & Horner R. H., (2003) Implementing a Targeted Group Intervention Within a School- Wide System of Behavior Support. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 225-240. March, R. E. & Horner, R. H. (2002) Feasibility and contributions of functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 158-70.

33. Manual on how to Implement the BEP Crone, Horner, & Hawken (2004). Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools: The Behavior Education Program. New York, NY: Guilford Press