Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGodwin Waters Modified over 8 years ago
1
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Exchange of Course Modules across Universities Axel Jantsch Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
2
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Fundamental Challenges Competition in research and education drives specialization → increase in number of specialized courses → labs have increasingly higher and more narrow competence profiles Peak competence is very expensive Education is under economic pressure
3
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Exchange of Courses and Modules Enlarges the economic base for peak competence Increases the selection of specialized course Increases the quality of specialized courses
4
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Practical Challenges Costs and inconvenience of travelling Should the teacher or the students travel Course delivery over the internet Does not deliver the live classroom experience Professional equipment and operation is costly as well Lab equipement and tools Verification of exam results; Student authentication Cost Model ?
5
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Exchange of a Course Module Partners: Royal Institute of Technology Danish Technical University (Prof. Jan Madsen) Course: System Modeling Supported by SOC-Mobinet (EU) and SOC-SME (Nordic Industrial Fund) January 2004 - May 2004
6
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Objectives Keep the pedagogic quality Reduce costs of course operation Share a course among multiple organizations
7
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Essence of Good, Traditional Courses Excellent textbook Well designed organization Labs Exercises Sequence of activities etc. Inspiring teacher
8
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Main Principles Improve the textbook with internet technology Provide an elaborate course organization which leads the student through the course Give the student control within the course limits Exploit opportunities of new technology
9
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Course Template Length: 16 weeks 3 Phases (Preparation, Interaction, Labs) Provider, Lecturer Local Organization, Host
10
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Phase 1: Preparation Length: 4-6 weeks Self study of material Homeworks Interaction with lecturer via web/email
11
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Phase 2: Interaction Length: 1 week Lecturer is present at host Lectures Exercise hours, joint discussion of problems and key issues Tutorials to labs
12
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Phase 3: Labs Length: 8-10 weeks Labs and projects Self study Homeworks Interaction with lecturer via web/email Exam
13
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Lecturer’s Responsibility Provide course material Exercises, homeworks Tools, accessible to the student at the host Labs, projects Exam Check exams and rate students Commit to high on-line availability for students and respond within 24 hours to every question and request from the students
14
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Host’s Responisbility Provide local organization Computer infra structure, net access Provide local responsible person Execute the exams
15
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 The Student Controls Progress The course consists of 5 - 10 chapters For each chapter the student repeats: Step A: Read lecture notes Step B: Interact with teacher Step C: Solve Exercises and labs Step D: Explore tools Step E: Pass check point
16
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Student - Teacher Interaction Email Internet based chat rooms In person Teacher responds to requests within 24 hours 30% as traditional lectures 70% in dialog form
17
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Tools and Labs Tools readily available via the internet Easy to install and license, or Operated by a host and aivalable via the net Labs to support the self-study process Labs for each chapter of the course
18
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Organization Options Free self-study Relative schedule with milestones and check points Controlled self-study with certificate Absolute schedule (2-3 month) with registration Milestones, Homeworks, labs, project Physically controlled examination Campus based exchange course Preperation phase Interaction phase (teacher presence) Lab phase Campus based course Preparation phase (teacher presence) Interaction phase (teacher presence) Lab phase (teacher presence)
19
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Course Template Summary Course template to accommodate new needs and opportunities Higher preparation costs but lower operation costs Gives the student more control while still providing a study skeleton
20
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Experience KTH’s System Modeling course given at DTU Jan. 2004 – May 2004 3 part template applied Elements: Reading instructions Home assignments Lectures Labs Exam Student numbers: 26 students registered 17 eventually passed the exam
21
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 System Modeling Course Survey and systematic development of Models of Computation Introduction Behaviour and Concurrency (FSMs and Petri Nets) The Untimed Model of Computation The Synchronous Model of Computation The Timed Model of Computation MoC Interfaces Tightly Coupled Process Networks Nondeterminism and Probability Applications Course Book: ”Modeling Embedded Systems and SoCs”, Morgan Kaufmann, June 2003
22
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Part I: Home Reading Home reading and home assignments 6 weeks Module schedule with deadlines Exercise server Interaction via email
23
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Part II: Lecture Monday 13-15: Lecture on Untimed models of computatio 15-17: Individual questions and discussions Tuesday 8-10: Lecture on Synchronous models of computation 10-12: Individual questions and discussions 13-15: Lecture on Timed models of computation 15-16:30: Individual questions and discussions
24
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Part III: Home Assignments 10 weeks Home reading Home assignments, exercise server Exam preparation Intensive contact by email and phone
25
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Exam Course provider: Design of exam Grading of exam Host: Organization of exam: room, student authetication, etc. Course approval
26
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Student Feedback 12 students answered Overall impression (1-5): 3.58 In line or slightly lower than for traditional courses Comments: ” There's no similar course at DTU so without your effort we would not have covered the subjects!” ” I think it is not really possible to have … on topics which are not always straightforward, using the distance learning method” “It was no problem that the course was distant learning, as the deadlines made you go through the book as the semester went forward” ”Solving exercises during the course is very good way to get a better understanding of the topics. Automatic checking of exercises is a very nice feature.” “Many of the exercises are too "computer generated" “
27
Axel Jantsch, KTH EWME - Stockholm, June 8, 2006 Conclusion The exchange of course modules is possible and useful, but It must be very carefully planned, structured and organized There must be a clear benefit Main obstacle is the cost model Costs for external and internal courses are calculated radically different Many Universities are not able to invest in education Universities and the education system is not prepared to outsource courses
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.