Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byChrystal Perry Modified over 9 years ago
1
Examination of Public Perceptions of Four Types of Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Programs Brandon Kopp Raymond Miltenberger
2
Introduction 1 in 5 children is victimized before reaching adulthood Sexual abuse has been shown to have severe and long lasting effects
3
Introduction – Training Methods Information-Based Examples Verbal Presentation Video Coloring/Activity Book Theatrical Presentation Behavioral Skills Training (BST) Instruction Modeling Rehearsal Social Reinforcement Corrective Feedback
4
Introduction – Program Content Basic Principles of Sexual Abuse Prevention Body Ownership Types of Touching Refusing, Escaping and Reporting Skills Strangers vs. Known Individuals as Perpetrators of Sexual Abuse 90% of children are abused by people they know
5
Introduction - Hypothesis Since practice has been shown to be most effective in teaching skills, and children are most often abused by someone they know, a program incorporating Known Perpetrators and BST should be most highly rated Hypothesis: Because it is easier to administer and is viewed as less controversial, a program incorporating Strangers as offenders and Information-Based training methods will be most highly rated by participants
6
Method – Participants 59 Participants (34 female, 25 male) Age Mean = 21.34 SD = 2.80 Range = 18.78 – 34.66 Participants who took part in this study earned extra credit for 100 – 300 level psychology courses at NDSU
7
Method - Questionnaire Main Program Description Program Format Common Content Body Ownership Types of Touching Refusing, Escaping, and Reporting Skills # of sessions (2) Length of each session (45 min.) Age of participants (10) Size of groups (10-20 children)
8
Method – Questionnaire (cont.) Four Different Versions of Main Program Type of Perpetrator Stranger vs. Known Individual Training Method Information-Based vs. Behavioral Skills Training Information-BasedBST StrangerStranger/InfoStranger/BST Known IndividualKnown/InfoKnown/BST
9
Modified Treatment Evaluation Inventory – Short Form (TEI-SF) I find this training program to be an acceptable way of teaching children sexual abuse prevention skills. I would be willing to use this training program if I had to teach children sexual abuse prevention skills. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
10
I like the methods used in this training program. I believe this training program is likely to be effective. I believe the child receiving training will experience discomfort during the training program. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
11
I believe this training program is likely to result in permanent improvement in a child’s sexual abuse prevention skills. Overall, I have a positive reaction to this training program. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
12
Method - Questionnaire Participants’ answers for question 1-4, 6, and 7 were coded as follows: Strongly Disagree = 1 Disagree = 2 Neutral = 3 Agree = 4 Strongly Agree = 5 Answers for question 5 were reverse coded This gives a range of possible scores of 7 – 35 The higher a program version was rated the more acceptable participants thought it was
13
Method - Procedure Participants were given the following instructions: Do not share answers with other participants Read through each version in the order it appears in the packet Rate each of the versions using the 7 statement evaluation form below each one Rate each of the program versions independently of one another
14
Results Means Information-BasedBST Stranger25.7825.02 Known Individual23.2221.15
15
Results - Comparison of Means
16
Results – 2-Way RM ANOVA Main Effects Type of Perpetrator F(1,57) = 14.832, p < 0.001, sig. Training Method F(1,57) = 8.270, p < 0.01, sig. Interaction Perpetrator X Training Method F (1,57) = 2.420, p > 0.05, ns
17
Paired Samples T-Tests Stranger/BST (25.02) >Known/BST (21.15) p < 0.001 Stranger/Info (25.78) >Known/Info (23.19) p < 0.01 Known/Info (23.19) >Known/BST (21.15) p < 0.05 Stranger/Info (25.78) >Known/BST (21.15) p < 0.001
18
Results - Exploratory Analyses (cont.) Effects of Participant Characteristics No significant effects were found for any of our between-subjects variables Gender CSA prevention training as a child CSA prevention training as an adult Volunteer experience dealing with CSA Experience with CSA victimization (either self or through someone close to them)
19
Results Kronbach’s Alpha Test of Reliability Information-BasedBST Stranger0.87240.9064 Known Individual0.91380.9142
20
Discussion - Conclusions With a scale of 7 - 35, a score of 21 would be the dividing point between acceptable and not Mean scores fell between 21.15 and 25.78, showing none were rated as highly acceptable
21
Discussion - Conclusions When strangers are shown as perpetrators, training method is not important Programs portraying strangers as offenders were rated significantly higher than programs portraying known individuals as perpetrators of sexual abuse
22
Discussion - Conclusions If known individuals are shown as perpetrators then an information-based program is preferable Those programs utilizing strangers as perpetrators and information-based training methods are preferable to programs using known individuals and BST
23
Discussion – This Study’s Weaknesses Using students as raters No determination of whether differences were due to lack of knowledge or biases toward programs that are easier to administer and less controversial No assessment of participants’ reading ability
24
Discussion – Recommendations for Future Research Replicate study with a more ecologically valid participant sample Parents School administrators Add questions to assess participants’ knowledge of sexual abuse perpetrators and effectiveness of training methods
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.