Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparative Analysis of the RF and Noise Performance of Bulk and Single-Gate Ultra-thin SOI MOSFETs by Numerical Simulation M.Alessandrini, S.Eminente,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparative Analysis of the RF and Noise Performance of Bulk and Single-Gate Ultra-thin SOI MOSFETs by Numerical Simulation M.Alessandrini, S.Eminente,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparative Analysis of the RF and Noise Performance of Bulk and Single-Gate Ultra-thin SOI MOSFETs by Numerical Simulation M.Alessandrini, S.Eminente, S.Spedo, C.Fiegna Department of Engineering - University of Ferrara, Italy

2 MOTIVATIONS ● Ultra-thin fully-depleted SOI MOSFETs can provide an alternative to conventional bulk MOSFETs due to: ● Control of short channel effects with low doping levels. ● Improvement of mobility at given surface density of inversion charge [Esseni IEDM 2000]. AIMS OF THIS WORK – To discuss the issue of modeling of mobility in ultra- thin SOI MOSFETs. – To compare ultra-thin SOI MOSFETs and bulk devices in terms of RF and noise performance.

3 OUTLINE ● Modeling approach and simulated devices. ● Modeling of mobility in ultra-thin SOI MOSFETs. ● Comparison of RF performance (F T and F MAX ). ● Comparison of noise performance.

4 Simulation approach ● Hydrodynamic simulations (DESSIS-ISE). ● Density gradient model for quantization. ● Direct tunneling through gate oxide. ● Empirically modified mobility model for SOI. ● Post-processor for distributed noise analysis (thermal and shot noise). Bulk and SOI device structures target at the 100 nm node. SOI devices with T SI =5.2 nm, N A =10 15 cm -3. Simulated devices

5 Mobility in ultra-thin SOI MOSFETs ● Conventional mobility models for bulk MOSFETs does not fit experiments for ultra-thin SOI MOSFETs [Esseni IEDM 2000]. ● Empirical fitting by adjusting parameters of an existing mobility model [Darwish TED 1997].

6 Simulation of RF figures of merit F MAX and F T are evaluated from the admittance matrix obtained by AC device simulation.

7 F MAX in MOSFETs For negligible substrate losses: Is limited by losses at the output port [Re(Y 22 ), Re(Y 12 )] Unilateral Mason's power gain: Ultra-thin SOI MOSFETs feature large R S values.

8 Transition Frequency L gate =70 nm F T of SOI is degraded at large gate overdrive, due to the parasitic source resistance that reduces transconductance.

9 Maximum Oscillation Frequency Lgate=70 nm F MAX of Bulk MOSFETs is reduced due to short channel effects leading to large drain-source conductance

10 Maximum Oscillation Frequency Lgate=70 nm For small W values, the parasitic source resistance dominates and the SOI device presents lower F MAX values at large gate overdrives (lower F T ).

11 RF Performance of Bulk and SOI MOSFETs - Summary ● The parasitic source resistance that affects the ultra-thin SOI device degrades the transition frequency. ● For large device width (R G >>R S ) F MAX is larger in the SOI case, due to lower short-channel effects. ● For narrow devices (R S >>R G ) F MAX of SOI MOSFETs is degraded at large V GS -V T.

12 Noise Sources in MOSFETs The spectral densities of noise sources are evaluated by post- processing device simulations.

13 Numerical modeling of NOISE in MOSFETs The MOSFET is approximated by a distributed lumped-element non-uniform transmission line. Parameters are evaluated starting from the results of 2-D hydrodynamic device simulation

14 Numerical modeling

15 Comparison of Noise sources ( L=0.1 um, T OX =1.5 nm, f=4GHz) Red simbols: SOI MOSFETs Black simbols: bulk MOSFETs

16 Dependence on oxide thickness (L=0.1 um, V GS -V T =0.27 um, f=4GHz) Red Simbols: SOI MOSFETs Black Simbols: bulk MOSFETs The gate shot noise increases dramatically as oxide thickness is scaled down. S IG-SHOT  I G It is larger in the bulk devices, due to larger tunneling gate current (lower oxide field at given inversion charge density).

17 Comparison of minimum noise Figure (L=0.1 um, f=4GHz, V GS -V T =0.27V) Red Simbols: SOI MOSFETs Black Simbols: bulk MOSFETs The noise figure of BULK is degraded as the oxide is scaled down and shot noise becomes dominant over induced-gate noise

18 Dependence of FMIN on frequency (L=0.1 um, V GS -V T =0.27V, T OX =1.2nm) Red simbols: SOI MOSFETs Black Simbols: Bulk MOSFETs As frequency is reduced, shot noise becomes dominant over induced gate noise (S IGN  f 2 ) and N FMIN becomes independent of frequency. At medium frequency N FMIN is lower in the SOI case

19 Comparison of Noise Performance of SOI and BULK MOSFETs- Summary ● SOI and BULK MOSFETs present comparable thermal noise (drain and induced gate current noise currents). ● Due to the lower gate tunneling current (lower oxide field), the gate shot noise current is lower in the SOI case, at relatively low frequencies.


Download ppt "Comparative Analysis of the RF and Noise Performance of Bulk and Single-Gate Ultra-thin SOI MOSFETs by Numerical Simulation M.Alessandrini, S.Eminente,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google