1. Items for Discussion for Joint Meeting between WG4 and WG2 16/Nov/2009 WG4: LCY-039

2. Items for Discussion 1.Project Title of SQL/MM Part 8 –Metadata Registry (MDR) Recognized conflict between WG 2 and WG 4 –Metadata Query Language (MQL) Rejected in the Jeju Plenary, June 2009 –Registry Query Component (RQC) –Registry Access Component (RAC) –MDR Access –Metadata Registry Access (MRA) –Reg. Access 2

3. Items for Discussion (cont.) 2. What should be the target registry (11179- 3 Ed.2 and Ed.3) 3

4. Items for Discussion (cont.) 2. Target Registry (11179 Ed.2 and Ed.3) –Korea Suggestion : We need to maintain the current scope of SQL/MM-8 and keep developing its 1st edition. Then, after ISO/IEC 11179-3 3rd edition is standardized, we’d better revise the 1st edition of SQL/MM-8. The reasons we made such decision are follows: ISO/IEC 11179-3 3rd edition is under development SQL/MM-8 can be easily revised to cover the 3rd edition of ISO/IEC 11179-3 The others such as the parts of ISO/IEC 20944 are based on ISO/IEC 11179-3 (ed. 2) 4

5. Items for Discussion (cont.) 3. Does WG2 have a list of incompatibilities between 11179-3 Ed.2 and Ed.3? 5

6. Items for Discussion (cont.) 4. Scope of SQL/MM Part 8 (Common part + Specialization?) –e.g., 11179-3(MDR), 19763 all Parts(MFI), 19773(MDR modules) 6

7. Items for Discussion (cont.) 5. Business Scenarios for Querying of Registries –WG 2 progress report? –Standardized data requirement for business scenarios? 7

8. Items for Discussion (cont.) 6. To what extent should Part 8 recognize the conformance levels defined by 11179-3? 8

9. Items for Discussion (cont.) 7. Should the Part 8 project be progressed by regular WG4/2 joint meeting or formation of collaborative group? 9