Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byValentine Reynolds Modified over 9 years ago
1
Although Affluent, Montgomery Co. has Low- and Moderate-Poverty Elementary Schools PERCENT OF CHILDREN RECEIVING FREE OR REDUCED PRICE OF LUNCH 0%–10% 11%–20% 21%–35% 36%–50% 51%–91% Elementary School
2
Montgomery County’s Economically Integrative Housing Approach Oldest, largest inclusionary zoning program in U.S. Housing authority has right to purchase 1/3 of inclusionary zoning units ~700 public housing homes scattered, and ~300 located in 5 public housing developments
3
Public Housing Distributed Broadly Throughout Hundreds of Neighborhoods
4
I Find Large, Positive Cumulative Effects in Math
5
Public Housing Students in Green Zone Schools Outperformed Those in Red Zone Schools
6
Impact on adult’s social networks
7
Who Are the Children in the Study? Examined 858 children who lived in public housing scattered throughout Montgomery County & enrolled in MCPS during 2001-2007 Public housing apts. spread across 250 out of 550 total neighborhoods Attended 114 of 131 elementary schools Families randomly assigned to public housing
8
Back-up slides for Heather
9
African-American 72% Hispanic 16% White 6% Asian 6% Average family income $21,047 Average family assets $775 Female headed household 87% Average length of tenancy 8.4 years What Are the Characteristics of Children and Families in the Study?
10
There Is Another Way to Measure School Disadvantage In 2000, MCPS adopted red zone/green zone policy It created 60 red zone elementary schools Extra investments in red zone schools: –First to receive full-day kindergarten –Class size reduction in grades 1–3 –100 hours professional development for teacher –Specialized instruction: 90-minute literacy; 60-minute math blocks in 1 st & 2 nd grade The average class size in red vs. green zone: 19 vs. 23
11
I Find Smaller Effects from Neighborhood Poverty
12
Conclusions School-based economic integration effects accrued over time Public housing children who went to low-poverty schools (green zone) outperformed their low- income peers who attended higher-poverty but higher-spending elementary schools (red zone) Inclusionary zoning integrated children from highly disadvantaged families into low-poverty neighborhoods and low-poverty schools over long term Children in public housing benefited academically from living in low-poverty neighborhoods –But less than they did from attending low-poverty schools
13
District’s Intervention in 60 Focus Schools Boosts Students’ Adv. Scores
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.