1. Fair Layered Coding Streaming Jaime García-Reinoso  Iván Vidal  Francisco Valera University Carlos III of Madrid Alex Bikfalvi IMDEA Networks

2. Our scenario Video streaming in a QoS-enabled network October 11-15, 2009 The First International Conference on Advances in P2P Systems, Sliema, Malta 2 Telco network (NGN) Service control & Media transport Telco network (NGN) Service control & Media transport Residentia l Gateways Users Trust Relationshi p Video content service providers media servers Telco

3. Streaming mechanism Application Level Multicast: how and why? Packet replication is done by the peers … meaning the same packets traverse same links several times … but peer uplink bandwidth is (very) limited … logical neighbors may be many hops away … peers (i.e. nodes) come and leave as they wish (churn) October 11-15, 2009 The First International Conference on Advances in P2P Systems, Sliema, Malta 3 Root node Interior node Leaf node Media server

4. Solution to the uplink limitation Divide the video stream in several sub- streams (stripes, descriptions) Mesh-like streaming structure Although content for a stripe is still pushed along a tree October 11-15, 2009 The First International Conference on Advances in P2P Systems, Sliema, Malta 4 Example: 2 stripes These peers can be interior nodes only for the red stripe These peers can be interior nodes only for the green stripe

5. P2P architecture (1/3) FLaCoSt is similar to SplitStream: P2P protocol used to create multicast trees for video streaming Based on Scribe/Pastry Uses multiple stripe delivery (more robust, supports multiple description coding) However: Takes into account the uplink resources at any time Only peers with resources are considered interior nodes Connecting children can easily identify these peers Peers re-compute resources whenever something changes October 11-15, 2009 The First International Conference on Advances in P2P Systems, Sliema, Malta 5

6. P2P architecture (2/3) For the purposes of this presentation We have three stripes with a different priority Use a slice in the hash space to contain nodes that can be interior nodes for each stripe Use an extra slice to contain nodes that cannot be interior nodes A peer computes its resources and can become a node in each slice October 11-15, 2009 The First International Conference on Advances in P2P Systems, Sliema, Malta 6 Example: 3 stripes High priority (HP) Medium priority (MP) Low priority (LP)

7. P2P architecture (3/3) The hash space is divided into peer groups October 11-15, 2009 The First International Conference on Advances in P2P Systems, Sliema, Malta 7 Interior nodes of high priority stripe Interior nodes of medium priority stripe Leaf nodes Interior nodes of low priority stripe FFF … C00 … BFF … 800 … 7FF … 000 … 3FF … 400 … 2 0 4 5 3 0 P1 ID P1,H P ID P1,LP ID P1,L P2 ID P2,H P ID P2,M P ID P2,L

8. Tree searching The initiator will use the closest neighbor If the neighbor is a passive peer, it forwards the request October 11-15, 2009 The First International Conference on Advances in P2P Systems, Sliema, Malta 8 2 128 - 1 0 0 0 2 Advertised LP ID Advertised Leaf ID All known IDs HP root Joining the HP tree

9. P2P simulation results Evaluate multicast tree behavior In resource limited scenarios, but otherwise ideal conditions Determine joining effort, geometry of multicast tree and success ratio Scenario Each peer has resources: (0/Res, 0/Res, 0/Res) Four scenarios: Res is 1, 3, 5, 7 October 11-15, 2009 The First International Conference on Advances in P2P Systems, Sliema, Malta 9 Res Peer Total Average Necessary Uplink 11.550% 34.5150% 57.5250% 710.5350% A resource of 1 for one stripe ≈33% of the video stream bit rate

10. Joining Tree Performance Number of hops needed to join the tree October 11-15, 2009 The First International Conference on Advances in P2P Systems, Sliema, Malta 10 Decreases with increasing the resources The improvement is significant when resources are low

11. Tree Geometry October 11-15, 2009 The First International Conference on Advances in P2P Systems, Sliema, Malta 11 Let’s see if we use P2P or client/server Probably we don’t want each peer to have 50% resources Otherwise, the root load is lower even for 10000 peers Tree depth is reasonable, but increases with the resources

12. Peer Level October 11-15, 2009 The First International Conference on Advances in P2P Systems, Sliema, Malta 12 At what level are most of the peers? Average peer level increases with the resources Takes the load off the root (media server) However, increases the tree depth

13. Played stripes Number of received stripes for a given user Best quality (3 stripes): 51.72 % of time Good quality (2 stripes): 47.95 % of time October 11-15, 2009 The First International Conference on Advances in P2P Systems, Sliema, Malta 13

14. Conclusions FLaCoSt: a P2P architecture for video streaming QoS-enabled network such as an NGN Video streams using several multicast trees (video stripes) New Scribe-based P2P protocol to select parent peers Simulation and real implementation results show The P2P algorithm is robust given a reasonable amount of peer resources Most of the time (> 99%) users receive a good or best quality video October 11-15, 2009 The First International Conference on Advances in P2P Systems, Sliema, Malta 14

15. Thank you October 11-15, 2009 The First International Conference on Advances in P2P Systems, Sliema, Malta 15