1. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/041 The Challenge of Preserving Moving Images Howard Besser NYU Moving Image Archiving & Preservation Program http://besser.tsoa.nyu.edu/howard/ http://www.nyu.edu/tisch/preservation/

2. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/042 The Challenge of Preserving Moving Images - The problems with any type of moving image material Film obsolescence Video obsolescence How are new works even more problematic? Digital obsolescence Technical & Conceptual Approaches to solutions Efforts to watch (projects, standards) Paradigm shifts needed

3. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/043 What’s challenging about Moving Image Collections? You can’t browse a collection Many different purposes (documenting events, telling stories) “Published” works have variant forms; upcoming concentration on repurposing Many physical formats (film gauges, video sizes and encoding, digital encoding and compressions)- No format even approaches the stability of non- acidic paper-

4. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/044 Lots of Formats; Hard to Store (VidiPax)

5. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/045 Moving Images are highly unstable, and an enormous # have already disappeared 50% of all titles produced before 1950 have vanished (approximate number as of late 1970s) This reflects full-length features; survival rates are much lower for other types (studio newsreels, shorts, docs, independent, …), and these “orphans” are particularly in peril Fewer than 20% of features from 1920s survive in complete form; survival rates of 1910s is <10% (& none of these are negatives) -Film Preservation 1993: A Study of the Current State of American Film Preservation, Vol 1: Report, June 1993, Report of the Librarian of Congress (http://www.loc.gov/film/study.html)

6. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/046 Film Decay (LC Dayton)

7. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/047 Some reasons why Moving Images are disappearing Most pre-sound films weren’t saved at all Nitrates hazard Video--changing formats, magnetic particles not adhering to backing, little recognition of importance of saving Who should be responsible for saving works without lucrative financial value Eastmancolor fading-

8. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/048 Color Restore (VidiPax)

9. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/049 A key problem: Obsolete Formats- Pre-film & film Video

10. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0410 Early Wax

11. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0411 Edison

12. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0412 Paper print (LC Dayton)

13. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0413 Mixed Film (FMIA)

14. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0414 16mm Cine Kodak film cameras (1930s, FMIA)

15. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0415 8mm Film reformatting (FMIA)

16. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0416 35 mm Nitrate Vault (LC Dayton)

17. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0417 Old Video Formats (www.vidipax.com)

18. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0418 Old Video Formats

19. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0419 Quad video (FMIA)

20. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0420 Quad tape

21. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0421 Mini Video floppy

22. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0422 Portapak

23. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0423 Sony deck

24. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0424 8mm video

25. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0425 Cleaning Deck

26. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0426 Cleaning Rollers

27. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0427 How are new works even more problematic?-

28. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0428 Conventional Works Manuscripts, books, paintings, sculpture We have a good sense of what the original object is Objective is to make object itself endure (temperature/humidity control, chemicals/pigments/fibers/adhesives, …) Goal is to keep object as close as possible to original state (though occasionally contraversy arises over whether to let aging show)

29. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0429 Electronic Media Video, audio, digital, new media Often difficult to determine what the original object is Difficult to make the original object endure (magnetic particle deterioration, warping, etc.) Even if we could make the original object endure, we wouldn’t have the infrastructure to view it in the future Need to develop a paradigm shift from preserving the original object to preserving info content Need to pay more attention to maintaining authenticity and replicating user experience

30. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0430 Issues with new works- What is the work? Complexity of rich media Difficulty of making the work last

31. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0431 ECI - Imagespace (early 80s)

32. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0432 ECI - Hole in Space (both)

33. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0433 ECI - 84-locations

34. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0434 Complexity of Rich Media Works often have artistic nature (including video games) Enormous number of elements can, at times, be very important to preserve (pacing, original artifact, elements used to construct the artifact) Too complex to save every one of these aspects for every type of material Importance of saving documentation

35. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0435 Special Characteristics of Electronic Works What Really is the Work? Disappearing software Enormous number of elements can, at times, be very important to preserve (randomness, interactivity, pacing, color, format, original artifact, elements used to construct the artifact) Pieces and Boundaries Recontextualization (Postmodernism)--which rendition to save? Dynamic & Lack of Fixity (evolving works) Interactivity Historical context Difficulty of authentication over time

36. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0436 Documentation & Preservation: What are we trying to do? Show the work the way people saw and interacted with it when it was first created (may be impossible; in the past, the artifact and how one interacted with it didn’t change much, so preservation and documentation were relatively straightforward) Show documentation of the work and people interacting with it when it was first created Reinstall/Recreate/Reinact the work

37. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0437 What can we do specific to Electronic Art? Works themselves may no longer even exist; in many cases, what we can save amounts to forensic evidence Enormous number of elements can, at times, be very important to preserve (pacing, original artifact, elements used to construct the artifact) Too complex to save every one of these aspects for every type of material Importance of saving pieces, representations, and documentation Involve the artists to capture their intentions Importance of Standards Familiarize ourselves with recent conservation developments (Who Knows?, TechArcheology, Tate, IMAP)

38. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0438 The Short Life of Digital Info: Digital Longevity Problems  Disappearing Information  The Viewing Problem  The Scrambling Problem  The Inter-relation Problem  The Custodial Problem  The Translation Problem

39. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0439 The Translation Problem Thinking of the Future (1/2) Screens will be different resolutions and different aspect ratios CRTs won’t exist A decade or 2 from now, today’s user interfaces will look like arrow-key navigation looks like today

40. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0440 The Translation Problem Thinking of the Future (2/2) Today’s streaming media are small windows, slow speeds As bandwidth increases, viewers will expect higher quality streams Creators may need to consider how they’ll be able to deliver higher-bandwidth streams –Delivery Derivatives vs. Masters encoded w/standards –May also want to re-edit the piece to take advantage of changes in technology, viewer expectations, society-

41. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0441 Responding to serious Longevity Problems  Previous formats required little ongoing intervention (remote storage facilities, Iron Mtn); digital formats require intense ongoing management  Need for:  Preservation Repositories  Preservation Metadata

42. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0442 Technical & Conceptual Approaches to Solutions- Save the Hardware & Software Emulate Migrate FRBR Artist Intentions

43. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0443 Save the Hardware & Software- A huge undertaking Computer Museum Broderbund

44. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0444 Old Digital Formats

45. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0445 Data Cartridge

46. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0446 DAT

47. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0447 128M Optical

48. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0448 Optical R/W

49. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0449 Syquest

50. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0450 Save the Hardware & Software A huge undertaking Computer Museum Broderbund

51. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0451 Possible endless need for reformatting implies Possible loss with each generation Requires managed environment

52. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0452 Approaches to Solutions- Save the Hardware & Software Emulate Migrate

53. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0453 Conceptual Approaches to Digital Preservation Refreshing always necessary due to volatility of physical strata –Impact on evidential value Migration -- advantages & disadvantages Emulation -- advantages & disadvantages And will need a long-term managed environment

54. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0454 Migration Wordstar to Word 1 to Word 3, … -Tables and complex features often get corrupted -Need to repeat every 4-5 years (maybe forever) +We know how to do this ourselves +If there’s a problem, we can catch it soon

55. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0455 Emulation Keep the Wordstar file format, but write emulators to make it work in newer environments +A better chance of carrying over complexity +Many more features can survive -Problems may not be caught until it’s too late -Specialists and a whole infrastructure of emulators required -Serious © problems (reverse engineering?)

56. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0456 Managed Environment More than temperature & humidity control Periodic monitoring of the works Periodic monitoring of the technical environment for viewing the works (software, systems, hardware) Trusted repositories

57. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0457 Incorporate parts of Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) work expression manifestation item

58. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0458 Standards for encoding artists intentions (group efforts w/i Cult Heritage community) Seeing Double Exhibition, & Symposium next Saturday Variable Media Initiative More recent SFMOMA/Tate collaborations IMAP Artists Interviews Project, Netherlands Institute for Cultural Heritage 1998-1999, Modern Art: Who Cares (http://www.icn.nl/english/6.4.2.html) TechArcheology: A Symposium on Installation Preservation (SFMOMA)

59. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0459 A few questions our community should address Special issues raised by non-library institutions Special issues raised by images and rich media What is the work (or salient points we need to preserve)? Bring the arts communities (artist intent, BAVC) together with the preservation repository communities and the preservation metadata communities Specifically get Cult Heritage communities involved with the selected OCLC/RLG recommendations Get cult heritage groups started on working to make sure that structure standards incorporate our works What organizations will take responsibility to save today’s digital “ephemeral” materials (online ‘zines, arts discussion groups, etc.)?

60. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0460 Efforts to watch (projects, standards)-

61. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0461 Preservation Repositories: Open Archival Info System Model Producer Management Consumer

62. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0462 Preservation Repositories: Projects based on OAIS Model  CEDARS  NEDLIB  Pandora  CDL  OCLC/RLG Working Group on Preservation Metadata, Attributes of a Trusted Digital Repository, August 2001-

63. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0463 OCLC/RLG Selected Recommendations Policies, Certification processes, Risk management, Persistent ID, Migration/Emulation experiments Stakeholders meet to decide how to describe what is in a dig repository Examine special properties of particular classes of digital objects Technical standards for exchange and interoperability btwn repositories Develop projects and case studies Copyright issues

64. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0464 OCLC/RLG Efforts PREservation Implementation Strategies (PREMIS) Working Group I and Working Group II

65. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0465 Other Digital Preservation Activities/Projects-  LC Natl Dig Info Infrastructure & Preservation  NYU/Public Television Project  InterPARES

66. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0466 LC’s National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program Authorized Dec 2000 LC, Dept of Commerce, NARA, White House Office of Sci & Tech Policy with help from CLIR, NLM, NAL, OCLC, RLG Ongoing collab process Commissioned papers on preserving: the Web, periodicals, digital sound, E-Books, Digital TV, Digital Video

67. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0467 Research: NYU/Public Television Project Preserve a broad set of elements (including ancillary material) Life-cycle mgmt (add metadata as soon as a clip comes in) Establish a community of stakeholders, working together for preservation (stations, university, librarians, journalists, historians, producers, scholars, …) Build an OAIS Server Explore appropriate file formats, wrappers, METS extensions Develop sustainable business model

68. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0468 InterPARES 2 International Research on Permanent Authentication Records in Electronic Systems Ongoing international archival world project examining how to make electronically-generated records last over time Developing the theoretical and methodological knowledge needed, then will formulate model policies, strategies, and standards Reliability, accuracy, authenticity In 2003 was extended to include dynamic, interactive, and experiential works

69. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0469 Conclusions for preserving all types of digital works: From the technological point of view Standards offer the best hope of overcoming Impediments Easier to maintain a single set of standards over long periods of time Puts your institution in the same large boat with lots of other institutions who will face obsolescence and migration problems periodically throughout the future

70. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0470 for artistic and other challenging works: How Best to save these works? Use Standards wherever possible Be aggressive about asset mgmt -- saving component parts and ancillary materials Both creator and Archive should develop an institution-wide plan for saving electronic works –Refreshing and either migration or emulation –Standard encoding schemes –What is the work? And prioritize what needs to be saved –Save ancillary materials and records

71. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0471 What can we do specific to electronic media? Works themselves may no longer even exist; in many cases, what we can save amounts to forensic evidence Enormous number of elements can, at times, be very important to preserve (pacing, original artifact, elements used to construct the artifact) Too complex to save every one of these aspects for every type of material Importance of saving pieces, representations, and documentation Involve creators & curators to capture intentions Importance of Standards Familiarize ourselves with recent conservation developments (Guggenheim’s Variable Media, Who Knows?, TechArcheology, Tate, IMAP)-

72. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0472 Paradigms Shifts needed OldNew Physical preservation atmospheric cntrlongoing mgmt What to save?artifactidea + ancillary material & documentation CatalogingIndividual work in hand FRBR Later accessArtifact & documentation Restaging, ancillary material & documentation

73. The Challenge of Preserving Moving Images Howard Besser, NYU Moving Image Archiving & Preservation Program http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/Longevity/ http://www.tisch.nyu.edu/preservation http://www.oclc.org/digitalpreservation/presmeta_wp.pdf http://www.interpares.org UC Libraries Systemwide Operations and Planning Advisory Group (SOPAG) Site http://www.slp.ucop.edu/sopag/ for the UC Digital Preservation & Archiving Committee Final Report http://www.guggenheim.org/variablemedia/ http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue7_6/besser/ http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/~howard/Metadata/UC-May00/ http://www.ifla.org/II/metadata.htm METS official site: http://www.loc.gov/standards/metshttp://www.loc.gov/standards/mets

74. VRT Media Preservation, 5/27/0474 Monitor Temp/Humidity