Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

New Uniform Guidance for Federal Grants: A-110 and A-133 are going away, so how will this impact your organization?

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "New Uniform Guidance for Federal Grants: A-110 and A-133 are going away, so how will this impact your organization?"— Presentation transcript:

1 New Uniform Guidance for Federal Grants: A-110 and A-133 are going away, so how will this impact your organization?

2 Agenda Schools Represented What is the Uniform Guidance? Why the Change? What are the Major Procurement Changes? The Five Methods of Procurement Questions to Consider/Examples of solutions Appendix

3 Schools Represented Al Brooks, Iowa State (public/some flexibility w/state rules) Carla Helm, University of Washington (public/subject to state rules) Chris Mihok, Yale University (private) LaDonna Purcell, Morehead State (public/subject to state rules)

4 What is the “Uniform Guidance”? 2 CFR 200 (Code of Federal Regulations) New “simplified” rules for federal grants awards Consolidates eight circulars into one (A-110, A-133, etc.) Applies to all aspects of grants management, not just procurement Guidance effective December 26, 2014 One fiscal year delay allowed for implementation of Procurement Standards, with caveats!

5 Why the Changes? Reduce fraud, waste and abuse Increase accountability Improve efficiency/ streamline processes Strengthen conflict of interest/ethics rules Measure performance Make procurement rules for grants more consistent with FAR (rules for federal contract purchases)

6 What are the Major Procurement Changes? Competition required at $3,000 micro purchase limit Designates five methods of procurement Requires independent cost estimates before proposals are received if over $150K Profit must be negotiated on sole source contracts over $3K Revised “Contract Provisions” – Appendix II

7 Five Methods of Procurement §200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed§200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed Key Concepts The non-Federal entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. (a) Procurement by micro-purchases Up to $3,000 (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures $3,000 to $150,000. (c) Procurement by sealed bids (formal advertising) $150,000 and greater in value. (d) Procurement by competitive proposals used when “conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids.” (f) Procurement by noncompetitive proposals used to obtain proposals from one source with conditions. Original Source A-102

8 Five Methods of Procurement Overview Dollar Threshold0-$3K$3K-150KOver $150K$3K upward Purchase Type Micro purchase Small Purchase Procedures Sealed Bids Competitive Proposals Non Competitive Proposals (sole source) Multiple bids requiredNY*YY N RFP with evaluation criteriaNNYY N Procedures for conducting technical evaluation and vendor selectionNY YY N Independent cost estimates or price analysisNNYY Y- if over $150K Profit must be negotiated when there is no price competitionNY - if no competition Y *it can be in writing, orally, vendor price list on website, or generated via online search engine

9 Small Purchase Procedure $3,000 - $150,000 §200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed Section (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Note: in the COFAR questions and answers an “adequate number” is stated as two (2). In section 16 of the FAR, the minimum number of bids is stated as three (3). What are your current bid limits (informal and formal)? How many transactions will be impacted by the $3,000 limit?

10 Independent Estimates of Bids and Proposals §200.323 Contract cost and price. (a) The non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals.* (c) Costs or prices based on estimated costs for contracts under the Federal award are allowable only to the extent that costs incurred or cost estimates included in negotiated prices would be allowable for the non-Federal entity under Subpart E—Cost Principles of this part. The non-Federal entity may reference its own cost principles that comply with the Federal cost principles.* How will you comply? Who will perform the independent estimates? You can’t call the vendor for a budget quote!

11 Negotiating Profit on Sole Source Procurements §200.323 Contract cost and price. (b) The non-Federal entity must negotiate profit as a separate element of the price for each contract in which there is no price competition and in all cases where cost analysis is performed. To establish a fair and reasonable profit, consideration must be given to the complexity of the work to be performed, the risk borne by the contractor, the contractor's investment, the amount of subcontracting, the quality of its record of past performance, and industry profit rates in the surrounding geographical area for similar work.* * Denotes a change from A-110 What is your strategy to negotiate profit with a sole source? What if you can’t get it?

12 Considerations – group discussion: Do you plan to delay implementation by one year? Will you handle federal and non-federal purchases differently or one process for all? Will you assign specific staff to manage federal purchases? How will you perform independent cost estimates? How to determine profit if the vendor won’t provide? Do you know how to perform cost analysis? Do you have an institutional or procurement code of conduct? Do you have geographical preference in your existing purchasing policies?

13 Questions?

14 Resources eCFR Part 200 (Electronic Code of Federal Regulations): http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text- idx?SID=964b1043192d2ce84162e7adea171120&tpl=/ecfrbrow se/Title02/2cfr200_main_02.tpl http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text- idx?SID=964b1043192d2ce84162e7adea171120&tpl=/ecfrbrow se/Title02/2cfr200_main_02.tpl COFAR (Council on Financial Assistance Reform): https://cfo.gov/cofar/ https://cfo.gov/cofar/ COGR (Council on Governmental Relations): http://www.cogr.edu/ (Some resources only avail. to members) http://www.cogr.edu/

15 Appendix

16 Additional Procurement Changes Requires code of conduct to manage conflicts of interest Prohibits use of geographical preferences Revises record keeping Adds new T&Cs – breach, termination, environmental Increased oversight and management of contracts

17 Code of Conduct §200.112 Conflict of Interest The Federal awarding agency must establish conflict of interest policies for Federal awards. The non-Federal entity must disclose in writing any potential conflict of interest to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in accordance with applicable Federal awarding agency policy. See also §200.318 General procurement standards§200.318 General procurement standards Parts (c) (1) and (2) New requirement Do you have established Conflict of Interest policies? How will you disclose “potential” conflicts?

18 Code of Conduct (cont.) §200.318 General procurement standards§200.318 General procurement standards (Conflict of Interest definition) (c)(1): The non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, or agent must participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a Federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. … a conflict of interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from a firm considered for a contract. The officers, employees, and agents of the non-Federal entity must neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to subcontracts.

19 Code of Conduct (cont.) §200.318 General procurement standards§200.318 General procurement standards (Conflict of Interest Definition – continued) … non-Federal entities may set standards for situations in which the financial interest is not substantial or the gift is an unsolicited item of nominal value. The standards of conduct must provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents of the non-Federal entity. (c)(2) - If the non-Federal entity has a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is not a state, local government, or Indian tribe, the non-Federal entity must also maintain written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the non-Federal entity is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization Part (c)(2) is new Does your institution have “affiliates”, etc? Do you know who they are?

20 Prohibitions on Geographical Preferences §200.319 Competition§200.319 Competition Part (b) Key Concept Part (b) prohibits the use of “… statutorily or administratively imposed state or local geographical preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals, except in those cases where applicable Federal statutes expressly mandate or encourage geographic preference.”. Part (c), (1) Restricts bid specification that “contain features which unduly restrict competition.” and that bid specifications “…must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use …”. How will this impact your town/gown relationship? Does this conflict with state statutes?

21 Record Keeping: rationale for method/price basis §200.318 General procurement standards§200.318 General procurement standards (Awards and Procurement Documentation) (h) The non-Federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Do you have systems in place to manage these new documentation requirements?

22 Procurement of Recovered Materials §200.322 Procurement of recovered materials A non-Federal entity that is a state agency or agency of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired by the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines.40 CFR part 247 Original source A-102 Have you determined the legal status of your school? For example, Iowa State University is governed by the State of Iowa, Board of Regents a political subdivision of the State of Iowa. ISU would be required to follow this section.

23 Procurement of Recovered Materials (cont.) §200.322 Procurement of recovered materials. Some of the key requirements of CFR 40 Part 247 include: (a) Preference program for purchasing the designated items; (b) Promotion program; (c) Procedures for obtaining estimates and certifications of recovered materials content and for verifying the estimates and certifications; and (d) Annual review and monitoring of the effectiveness of the program.

24 Management and Oversight of Contracts §200.318 General procurement standards (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. (k) The non-Federal entity alone must be responsible, in accordance with good administrative practice and sound business judgment, for the settlement of all contractual and administrative issues arising out of procurements. These issues include, but are not limited to, source evaluation, protests, disputes, and claims. These standards do not relieve the non-Federal entity of any contractual responsibilities under its contracts. Do you verify that goods and services were received prior to payment?


Download ppt "New Uniform Guidance for Federal Grants: A-110 and A-133 are going away, so how will this impact your organization?"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google