1. Machine Design Status Geoffrey Krafft and Yuhong Zhang CASA For the JLab EIC Study Group EIC Collaboration Meeting, Catholic University of America, July 29-31, 2010

2. Outline Introduction & Highlights Machine Design Status Design Details Path forward Summary

3. ELIC : JLAB’s Future Nuclear Science Program JLab has been developing a preliminary design of an EIC based on the CEBAF recirculating SRF linac for nearly a decade. Requirements of the future nuclear science program drives ELIC design efforts to focus on achieving ultra high luminosity per detector (up to 10 35 ) in multiple detectors very high polarization (>80%) for both electrons & light ions Over the last 12 months, we have made significant progress on design optimization The primary focus is on a Medium-energy Electron Ion Collider ( ) as the best compromise between science, technology and project cost –Energy range is up to 60 GeV ions and 11 GeV electrons A well-defined upgrade capability to higher energies is maintained High luminosity & high polarization continue to be the design drivers

4. Highlights of Last Six Months of ELIC Design Activities Continuing design optimization –Tuning main machine parameters to better serve the science program –Now aim for high luminosity AND large detector acceptance –Simplified design and reduced R&D requirements Focused on detailed design of major components –Completed baseline design of two collider rings –Completed 1 st design of Figure-8 pre-booster (B Erdelyi, July 30) –Completed beam polarization scheme with universal electron spin rotators (P. Chevtsov, July 30, Morozov) –Updated IR optics design (A. Bogacz, July 31 ) Continued work on critical R&D –Beam-beam simulations (B.Terzic, July 29) –Nonlinear beam dynamics and instabilities (B. Yunn, July 31, Zhang) –Chromatic corrections (V. Morozov, July 31)

5. Short Term (6 Months) Design “Contract” MEIC accelerator team is committed to completing a MEIC design within by International Advisory Committee Meeting with the following features CM energy up to 51 GeV,  up to 11 GeV electron, 60 (30) GeV proton (ion) Upgrade option to high energy Three IPs, at least two of them are available for medium energy collisions Luminosity up to of order 10 34 cm -2 s -1 per collision point Large acceptance for at least one medium-energy detector High polarization for both electron and light ion beams This “contract” will be renewable every 6 months with major revision of design specifications due to development of Nuclear science program Accelerator R&D

6. Short Term Technical Strategy Focus of MEIC accelerator team during this period is to work out a complete machine design with sufficient technical detail. We are taking a conservative technical position by limiting many MEIC design parameters within or close to the present state-of- art in order to minimize technical uncertainty. –Maximum peak field of ion superconducting dipole is 6 T –Maximum synchrotron radiation power density is 20 kW/m –Maximum betatron value at FF quad is 2.5 km This conservative technical design will form a baseline for future design optimization guided by –Evolution of the science program –Technology innovation and R&D advances.

7. : Medium Energy EIC Three compact rings: 3 to 11 GeV electron Up to 12 GeV/c proton (warm) Up to 60 GeV/c proton (cold)

8. Detailed Layout

9. ELIC: High Energy & Staging Ion Sources SRF Linac p e ee p p prebooster ELIC collider ring MEIC collider ring injector 12 GeV CEBAF Ion ring electron ring Vertical crossing Interaction Point Circumferencem1800 Radiusm140 Widthm280 Lengthm695 Straightm306 StageMax. Energy (GeV/c) Ring Size (m) Ring TypeIP # pepepe Medium605 (11)1000ColdWarm3 High250101800ColdWarm4 Serves as a large booster to the full energy collider ring

10. Collider Luminosity Probability an event is generated by a Beam 1 bunch with Gaussian density crossing a Beam 2 bunch with Gaussian density Event rate with equal transverse beam sizes Linear beam-beam tune shift

11. Luminosity beam-beam tune-shift relationship Express Luminosity in terms of the (larger!) vertical tune shift (i either 1 or 2) Necessary, but not sufficient, for self-consistent design Expressed in this way, and given a “known” limit to the beam-beam tune shift, the only variables to manipulate to increase luminosity are the stored current, the aspect ratio, and the β* (beta function value at the interaction point) Applies to ERL-ring colliders, stored beam (ions) only

12. Design Parameters for a Large Acceptance Detector ProtonElectron Beam energyGeV605 Collision frequencyGHz1.5 Particles per bunch10 0.4161.25 Beam CurrentA13 Polarization%> 70~ 80 Energy spread10 -4 ~ 37.1 RMS bunch lengthcm107.5 Horizontal emittance, normalizedµm rad0.3554 Vertical emittance, normalizedµm rad0.0711 Horizontal β*cm10 Vertical β*cm22 Vertical beam-beam tune shift0.0070.03 Laslett tune shift0.07Very small Distance from IP to 1 st FF quadm73.5 Luminosity per IP, 10 33 cm -2 s -1 5.6

13. Design Parameters for a High Luminosity Detector ProtonElectron Beam energyGeV605 Collision frequencyGHz1.5 Particles per bunch10 0.416 (0.3)1.25 Beam CurrentA1 (0.7)3 Polarization%>70~ 80 Energy spread10 -4 ~ 37.1 RMS bunch lengthcm10 (5)7.5 Horizontal emittance, normalizedµm rad0.3554 Vertical emittance, normalizedµm rad0.0711 Horizontal β*cm5 (2) Vertical β*cm1 (0.4) Vertical beam-beam tune shift0.0070.03 Laslett tune shift0.07 (0.1)Very small Distance from IP to 1 st FF quadm5 (3)3.5 Luminosity per IP, 10 33 cm -2 s -1 11.2 (20)

14. : CM Energy Range Figure-8 Ring Circumference Maximum Peak Dipole Field Luminosity Design Point Maximum energy CM Energy Range (S) mTGeV x GeVGeVGeV 2 10006~ 60 x 5 (s=1200)60/112640 10008~ 80 x 5 (s=1600)80/113520 Figure-8 Ring Circumference Maximum Peak Dipole Field Luminosity Design Point Maximum Energy CM Energy Range (S) mTGeV x GeVGeVGeV 2 12506~ 100 x 7 (s=2800)108/114752 12508~ 125 x 7 (s=3500)154/116776 After LHC demonstrates its SC magnets can provide 8 T peak field Increase of arc part only by 50%, cost increase is about 10%. More space for arc dipoles for bending higher energy ions. Increase electron current by reducing synchrotron radiation by 50%. There is no need to increase length of the straight sections. Where is the richest physics program?

15. Ring-Ring Design Features  Ultra high luminosity  Polarized electrons and polarized light ions  Up to three IPs (detectors) for high science productivity  “Figure-8” ion and lepton storage rings  Ensures spin preservation and ease of spin manipulation  Avoids energy-dependent spin sensitivity for all species  Present CEBAF injector meets MEIC requirements  12 GeV CEBAF can serve as a full energy injector  Simultaneous operation of collider & CEBAF fixed target program possible  Experiments with polarized positron beam would be possible

16. Figure-8 Ion Rings Figure-8 optimum for polarized ion beams –Simple solution to preserve full ion polarization by avoiding spin resonances during acceleration –Energy independence of spin tune –g-2 is small for deuterons; a figure-8 ring is the only practical way to arrange for longitudinal spin polarization at interaction point –Long straights can be useful Allows multiple interactions in the same straight – can help with chromatic correction –Main disadvantage is small cost increase –There are no technical disadvantages

17. Adopts Proven Luminosity Approaches High luminosity at B factories comes from Very small β* (~6 mm) to reach very small spot sizes at collision points Very short bunch length (σ z ~ β*) to avoid hour-glass effect Very small bunch charge which makes very short bunch possible High bunch repetition rate restores high average current and luminosity Synchrotron radiation damping  KEK-B and PEPII already over 2x10 34 /cm 2 /s KEK BMEIC Repetition RateMHz5091500 Particles per Bunch10 3.3/1.40.42/1.25 Beam currentA1.2/1.81/3 Bunch lengthcm0.61/0.75 Horizontal & Vertical β*cm56/0.5610/2 Luminosity per IP, 10 33 cm -2 s -1 205.6 ~ 11 JLab believes these ideas should be replicated in the next electron-ion collider

18. Potential 3 rd IR (60 m) Spin Rotator (8.8°/4.4°, 50 m) 1/4 Electron Arc (106.8°, 117.5 m) Figure-8 crossing angle: 2x30° Experimental Hall (radius 15 m) RF Straight (20 m) Spin Rotator (8.8°/4.4°, 50 m) IR (60 m) Injection from CEBAF polarimetry 1/4 Electron Arc (106.8°, 117.5 m) Electron Figure-8 Collider Ring

19. Electron Collider Ring LengthField Dipole1.1 m1.25 T (2.14 deg) Quad0.4 m9 kG/cm Cell4 m phase adv/cell: 135 0 circumference ~1000 m 26 FODO cells 2 dis. sup. cells Electron ring is designed in a modular way two long (240 m) straights (for two IPs) two short (20 m) straights (for RF module), dispersion free four identical (120 º ) quarter arcs, made of 135º phase advance FODO cell with dispersion suppressing four 50 m long electron spin rotator blocks 135º FODO Cell for arc One quarter arc

20. Electron Polarization in Figure-8 Ring GeVHours 314.6 43.5 51.1 60.46 90.06 110.02 electron spin in vertical direction ions electron Universal Spin Rotators spin tuning solenoid electron spin in longitudinal direction Self polarization time in MEIC electron spin in vertical direction Polarized electron beam is injected at full energy from 12 GeV CEBAF Electron spin is in vertical direction in the figure-8 ring, taking advantage of self-polarization effect Spin rotators will rotate spin to longitudinal direction for collision at IP, than back to vertical direction in the other half of the ring

21. Universal Spin Rotator ESolenoid 1Solenoid 2Spin rotation spin rot. BDLspin rot. BDLarc bend 1 src bend 2 GeVradT mradT mrad 3π/215.700π/3π/6 4.5π/411.8π/223.6π/2π/4 60.6312.3π-1.2338.22π/3π/3 9π/615.72π/362.8ππ/2 120.6224.6π-1.2376.44π/32π/3 e- spin 8.8º 4.4º from arc solenoid 4.16 m decoupling quad insert BL = 28.712 Tesla m M = C  C 0 0

22. Electron Beam Time Structure & RF System <3.3 ps (<1 mm) 0.2 pC 0.67 ns (20 cm) 1.5 GHz 10-turn injection 33.3 μs (2 pC) 40 ms (~5 damping times) 25 Hz 3000 “pulses” =120 s Microscopic bunch duty factor 5x10 -3 From CEBAF SRF Linac MEIC RF operation frequencyMHz1.497 Total PowerMW6.1 Harmonic number4969 RF VoltageMV4.8 Beam currentA3 Energy loss per turnMeV2 R/Q90 HOM PowerkW2 Accelerating voltage gradient MV/m1 Unloaded Q1.2×10 9 Number of cavities16

23. PEP II CESR BESSY Possible Electron Ring RF Systems RF may prefer 748.5 MHz (coupler limits)

24. Beam Synchronization Electron speed is already speed of light at 3 to 11 GeV, ion speed is not, there is 0.3% variation of ion speed from 20 to 60 GeV Needs over 67 cm path length change for a 1000 m ring Solution for case of two IPs on two separate straights –At the higher energies (close to 60 GeV), change ion path length  ion arc on movers –At the lower energies (close to 20 GeV), change bunch harmonic number  Varying number of ion bunches in the ring With two IPs in a same straights  Cross-phasing More studies/implementation scheme needed eRHIC e-Ring Path Length Adjustment (eRHIC Ring-Ring Design Report) nβ=(h-n)/hγEnergy (GeV) 01infInf 10.999847.4443.57 20.999633.5430.54 30.999327.3924.76 40.999123.7221.32 50.998921.2218.97 60.998719.3717.24 Harmonic Number vs. Proton Energy

25. Forming the High-Intensity Ion Beam Stacking/accumulation process  Multi-turn (~20) pulse injection from SRF linac into the prebooster  Damping/cooling of injected beam  Accumulation of 1 A coasted beam at space charge limited emittance  Fill prebooster/large booster, then accelerate  Switch to collider ring for booster, RF bunching & staged cooling Circumferencem100 Energy/uGeV0.2 -0.4 Cooling electron currentA1 Cooling time for protonsms10 Stacked ion currentA1 Norm. emit. After stackingµm16 Stacking proton beam in ACR Energy (GeV/c)CoolingProcess Source/SRF linac0.2Full stripping Prebooster/Accumulator-Ring3DC electronStacking/accumulating Low energy ring (booster)12ElectronRF bunching (for collision) Medium energy ring60ElectronRF bunching (for collision) source SRF Linac pre-booster- Accumulator ring low energy ring Medium energy collider ring cooling

26. Ion SRF Linac (First Cut) Ion species Up to Lead Ion species for reference design 208 Pb Kinetic energy of lead ions MeV/u100 Maximum beam current averaged over the pulse mA2 Pulse repetition rate Hz10 Pulse length ms0.25 Maximum beam pulsed power kW680 Fundamental frequency MHz115 Total length m150 QWR HWR DSR Accelerating a wide variety of polarized light ions and unpolarized heavy ion Up to 285 MeV for H - or 100 MeV/u for 208 Pb +67 Requires stripper for heavy ions (Lead) for efficiency optimization

27. Ion Pre-booster Drift (arc)m0.35 Drift (SS)m3 Quadm0.4 Max Quad Field (arc)T0.81 Dipolem2 Bending angledeg11.47 ARC1 SS1 Dispersive ARC2 SS2(Non dispersive) ARC3 SS3 Dispersive ARC4 SS4 (Non Dispersive) Total lengthm300 Straight (long)m2x57 Straight (short, in arc)m2x23 Figure-8 angledeg95.35 Max particle γ4.22 Transition γ5.4 Momentum compaction0.0341

28. Detector Concept and IR layout IP EM Calorimeter Hadron Calorimeter Muon Detector EM Calorimeter Solenoid yoke + Hadronic Calorimeter Solenoid yoke + Muon Detector HTCC RICH Tracking ultra forward hadron detection dipole low-Q 2 electron detection large aperture electron quads small diameter electron quads ion quads small angle hadron detection dipole central detector with endcaps 5 m solenoid ~50 mrad crossing Pawel Nadel-Turonski

29. IR Optics (electrons) Natural Chromaticity:  x = -47  y = -66 190 800 0 5 0 BETA_X&Y[m] DISP_X&Y[m] BETA_XBETA_YDISP_XDISP_Y l * = 3.5m IP FF doublets f

30. Synchrotron Radiation Background M. Sullivan July 20, 2010 F$JLAB_E_3_5M_1A 240 3080 4.6x10 4 8.5x10 5 2.5W 38 2 Rate per bunch incident on the surface > 10 keV Rate per bunch incident on the detector beam pipe assuming 1% reflection coefficient and solid angle acceptance of 4.4 % 50 mrad Beam current = 2.32 A 2.9x10 10 particles/bunch Photons incident on various surfaces from the last 4 quads Michael Sullivan, SLAC

31. Simulating the beam-beam effects becomes critically important as part of the feasibility study of this conceptual design Staged approach to simulations (Terzić talk on 7/29): –Current: isolate beam-beam effects at IP (idealized linear beam transport) –Next: incorporate non-linearity in the beam transport around the ring Main points of this stage of beam-beam simulations: –Developed a new, automated search for working point based on an evolutionary algorithm (near half-integer resonance: exceeds design luminosity by ~33%) –Short-term stability verified to within capabilities of strong-strong code –As beam current is increased, beam-beam effects do not limit stability –Beam-beam effects are not expected limit the capabilities of the MEIC Beam-beam Studies

32. Electron Beam Stability The following issues have been studied Impedances Inductive impedance budget Resistive wall impedance CEBAF cavity HOM loss Single bunch instabilities Multibunch instabilities Intrabeam scattering Touschek scattering Beam-gas scattering Ion trapping & fast beam-ion instability Electron clouds As long as design of vacuum chamber follows the examples of ring colliders, especially B-factories, we will be safe from the single bunch instabilities. No bunch lengthening and widening due to the longitudinal microwave instability is expected No current limitation from transverse mode coupling instability. The performance of MEIC e-ring is likely to be limited by multi-bunch instabilities. Feedback system able to deal with the growth has to be designed. All ion species will be trapped. Total beam current limitation and beam lifetime will depend upon the ability of the vacuum system to maintain an acceptable pressure, about 5 nTorr in the presence of 3 A of circulating beam.

33. MEIC Critical Accelerator R&D Level of R&DLow-to-Medium Energy (12x3 GeV/c) & (60x5 GeV/c) High Energy (up to 250x10 GeV) Challenging Semi Challenging IR design/chromaticity Electron cooling Traveling focusing (for very low ion energy) IR design/chromaticity Electron cooling LikelyCrab crossing/crab cavity High intensity low energy ion beam Crab crossing/crab cavity High intensity low energy ion beam Know-howSpin tracking Beam-Beam Spin tracking Beam-beam We have identified the following critical R&D for MEIC Interaction region design and limits with chromatic compensation Electron cooling Crab crossing and crab cavity Forming high intensity low energy ion beam Beam-beam effect Beam polarization and tracking Traveling focusing for very low energy ion beam

34. Future Accelerator R&D We will concentrate R&D efforts on the most critical tasks Focal Point 1: Complete Electron and Ion Ring designs sub tasks:Finalize chromaticity correction of electron ring and complete particle tracking Insert interaction region optics in ion ring Start chromaticity correction of ion ring, followed by particle tracking Focal Point 2: IR design and feasibility studies of advanced IR schemes sub tasks:Develop a complete IR design Beam dynamics with crab crossing Traveling final focusing and/or crab waist?

35. Future Accelerator R&D Focal Point 3: Forming high-intensity short-bunch ion beams & cooling sub tasks:Ion bunch dynamics and space charge effects (simulations) Electron cooling dynamics (simulations) Dynamics of cooling electron bunch in ERL circulator ring Led by Peter Ostroumov (ANL) Focal Point 4: Beam-beam interaction sub tasks: Include crab crossing and/or space charge Include multiple bunches and interaction points Additional design and R&D studies Electron spin tracking, ion source development Transfer line design

36. Electron Cooling of Colliding Ion Beams 10 m Solenoid (7.5 m) SRF ERL injector dumper Electron cooler is located at center for figure-8 ring Compact cooler design Doubled length of cooling section, therefore the cooling rate Reduces number of circulation Cooling (Derbenev) IBS (Piwinski) IBS (Derbenev) ssS Horizontal 7.8 86 longitudinal6651

37. ERL Circulator Cooler Design goal Up to 33 MeV electron energy Up to 3 A CW unpolarized beam (~nC bunch charge @ 499 MHz) Up to 100 MW beam power! Solution: ERL Circulator Cooler ERL provides high average current CW beam with minimum RF power Circulator ring for reducing average current from source and in ERL (# of circulating turns reduces ERL current by same factor) Technologies High intensity electron source/injector Energy Recovery Linac (ERL) Fast kicker Electron circulator ring

38. Collaborations Established Interaction region designM. Sullivan (SLAC) ELIC ion complex front end P. Ostroumov (ANL) (From source up to injection into collider ring) –Ion source V. Dudnikov, R. Johnson (Muons, Inc) V. Danilov (ORNL) –SRF LinacP. Ostroumov (ANL), B. Erdelyi (NIU) Chromatic compensationA. Netepenko (Fermilab) Beam-beam simulation J. Qiang (LBNL) Electron cooling simulationD. Bruhwiler (Tech X) Electron spin trackingD. Barber (DESY)

39. ELIC Study Group A. Afanasev, A. Bogacz, J. Benesch, P. Brindza, A. Bruell, L. Cardman, Y. Chao, S. Chattopadhyay, E. Chudakov, P. Degtiarenko, J. Delayen, Ya. Derbenev, R. Ent, P. Evtushenko, A. Freyberger, D. Gaskell, J. Grames, L. Harwood, T. Horn, A. Hutton, C. Hyde, R. Kazimi, F. Klein, G. A. Krafft, R. Li, L. Merminga, J. Musson, A. Nadel-Turonski, M. Poelker, R. Rimmer, A. Thomas, M. Tiefenback, H. Wang, C. Weiss, B. Wojtsekhowski, B. Yunn, Y. Zhang - Jefferson Laboratory staffs and users W. Fischer, C. Montag - Brookhaven National Laboratory D. Barber - DESY V. Danilov - Oak Ridge National Laboratory V. Dudnikov - Brookhaven Technology Group P. Ostroumov - Argonne National Laboratory V. Derenchuk - Indiana University Cyclotron Facility A. Belov - Institute of Nuclear Research, Moscow, Russia V. Shemelin - Cornell University

40. Summary MEIC is optimized to collide a wide variety of polarized light ions and unpolarized heavy ions with polarized electrons (or positrons) MEIC covers an energy range matched to the science program proposed by the JLab nuclear physics community (~2500 GeV 2 ) with luminosity up to 6x10 33 cm -2 s -1 An upgrade path to higher energies (250x10 GeV 2 ), has been developed which should provide luminosity of 1x10 35 cm -2 s -1 The design is based on a Figure-8 ring for optimum polarization, and an ion beam with high repetition rate, small emittance and short bunch length Electron cooling is absolutely essential for cooling and bunching the ion beams We have identified the critical accelerator R&D topics for MEIC, and hope to start working on them soon MEIC is the future of Nuclear Physics at Jefferson Lab

41. : Reaching Down Low Energy Compact low energy ion ring electron ring (1 km ) Medium energy IP low energy IP A compact (~150 m) ring dedicated to low energy ion Space charge effect is the leading factor for limiting ion beam current and luminosity A small ring with one IP, two snake, injection/ejection and RF Ion energy range from 12 GeV to 20 GeV Increasing ion current by a factor of 6, thus luminosity by 600%

42.  Energy Wide CM energy range between 10 GeV and 100 GeV Low energy: 3 to 10 GeV e on 3 to 12 GeV/c p (and ion) Medium energy: up to 11 GeV e on 60 GeV p or 30 GeV/n ion and for future upgrade High energy: up to 10 GeV e on 250 GeV p or 100 GeV/n ion  Luminosity 10 33 up to 10 35 cm -2 s -1 per collision point Multiple interaction points  Ion Species Polarized H, D, 3 He, possibly Li Up to heavy ion A = 208, all stripped  Polarization Longitudinal at the IP for both beams, transverse of ions Spin-flip of both beams All polarizations >70% desirable  Positron Beam desirable ELIC Design Goals

43. MEIC Science Drivers Key issues in nucleon structure & nuclear physics Sea quark and gluon imaging of nucleon with GPDs (x >~ 0.01) Orbital angular momentum, transverse spin, and TMDs QCD vacuum in hadron structure and fragmentation Nuclei in QCD: Binding from EMC effect, quark/gluon radii from coherent processes, transparency Machine/detector requirements High luminosity > 10 34 : Low rates, differential measurements CM energy s~1000 GeV 2 : Reach in Q 2, x Detectability: Angular coverage, particle ID, energy resolution exclusive, electroweak processes ∫L dt (fb -1 ) E CM (GeV) 0 2020 4040 60 8080 100 120 110100 gluon saturation sin 2 θ W DIS nucleon structure x min ~ 10 -2 x min ~ 10 -3 x min ~ 10 -4 50 fb -1 quarks, gluons in nuclei MEIC  favors lower & more symmetric energies R. Ent MEIC

44. MEIC Enabling Technologies Pushing the limits of present accelerator theory –Issues associated with short ion bunches (e.g.. cooling) –Issues associated with small β* at collision points Focus on chromatic compensation –Beam-beam effects Development of new advanced concepts – Dispersive crabbing – Beam-based fast kicker for circulator electron cooler

45. Achieving High Luminosity MEIC design luminosity L~ 6x10 33 cm -2 s -1 for medium energy (60 GeV x 3 GeV) Luminosity Concepts High bunch collision frequency (0.5 GHz, can be up to 1.5 GHz) Very small bunch charge (<3x10 10 particles per bunch) Very small beam spot size at collision points (β* y ~ 5 mm) Short ion bunches (σ z ~ 5 mm) Keys to implementing these concepts Making very short ion bunches with small emittance SRF ion linac and (staged) electron cooling Need crab crossing for colliding beams Additional ideas/concepts Relative long bunch (comparing to beta*) for very low ion energy Large synchrotron tunes to suppress synchrotron-betatron resonances Equal (fractional) phase advance between IPs

46. Straight Section Layout spin rotators spin rotator collision point vertical bend i i e e arc dipoles ~0.5 m arc bend spin rotator vertical bend ~0.5 m vertical bend y z straight section Vertical crossing angle (~30 mrad) Minimizing crossing angle reduces crab cavity challenges Detector space IP ~ 60 m FF Crab cavity Matching quad Chrom FODO Matching quads Chrom Crab cavity FODO Interaction Region Optional 2 nd detector

47. Technology Under Consideration: Crab Waist Proposed for Super-B factory for luminosity enhancement (Raimondi) Deals with large Piwinski angle and low vertical beta-star Super-B design calls for 0.2 mm β* while bunch length is 6 mm Recent proof-of-principle experiment at DAΦNE very positive Crabbed waist can be realized with a sextupole in with IP in x and at π/2 in y 2  z 2  x  z x 2  x /  2  z *  e- e+  Y

48. Positrons in CEBAF/MEIC Unpolarized positrons generated from the modified electron injector by a converter Self-polarization in the lepton storage ring Positron source development at JLab “CEPBAF”, S. Golge (Ph. D thesis) Polarized e+ Source, J. Dumas (PhD thesis) Joint JLab/Idaho Univ. Positron Program International Workshop on Positrons at Jefferson Lab March 25-27, 2009 (M. Poelker) Position-ion collisions should reach same luminosity as electron-ion collisions

49. Technology Under Consideration: Traveling Final Focusing Space charge effect dominates in a very low energy ion beam Laslett tune-shift limits total charge that can be loaded into a bunch Long ion bunch can hold more charge with same charge density, therefore increasing luminosity Hour glass effect can kill luminosity if the bunch length is much large than β* “Traveling final focusing” has been proposed to mitigate hour glass effect (Brinkmann/Dohlus), originally using RF cavity New realization scheme: crab crossing with sextupoles slice 2 F1F1 slice 1 F2F2 sextupole slice 1 Crab cavity