1. 2009/2010 DSTP/AYP Review

2. DSTP and AYP Review Appoquinimink and Statewide Trends AYP Status for Appoquinimink Schools Appoquinimink Key Areas of Focus

3. 2010 DSTP Results

4. Appoquinimink and Statewide Trends Graphs indicate percentage that meets or exceeds the standard in math and reading for grades 3,5,8, and 10. Two lines, one indicating Appoquinimink’s percentage of students who meet or exceed the standard, the other indicates the State of Delaware’s.

5. 3 rd Grade Reading DSTP

6. 5th Grade Reading DSTP

7. 8 th Grade Reading DSTP

8. 10th Grade Reading DSTP

9. Grade by Grade Reading Rankings (% Meets) Reading GradeRankDistricts Above Appo 25CR, Cape, IR, Lake Forest 37CR, Cape, IR, Lake Forest, Milford, Woodbridge 43IR, Milford 54IR, Milford, Smyrna 65CR, Cape, IR, Milford 73IR, Milford 81 95IR, Milford, Polytech, Sussex Tech 103Polytech, Sussex Tech

10. 3rd Grade Math DSTP

11. 5th Grade Math DSTP

12. 8th Grade Math DSTP

13. 10th Grade Math DSTP

14. Grade by Grade Math Rankings (% Meets) Math GradeRankDistricts Above Appo 27Cape, IR, Lake Forest, Milford, Smyrna, Woodbridge 38CR, Cape, IR, Lake Forest, Milford, Smyrna, Woodbridge 44CR, IR, Milford 55 62Milford 71 81 94Delmar, Polytech, Sussex Tech 104Polytech, Red Clay, Sussex Tech

15. Context is Important: 2009/2010 was a Unique Year Reading Accommodation Changes Shorter Instructional Window due to Unusual Winter Weather (one and a half weeks lost) Professional Development Days Eliminated New Reading Curriculum for Grades 1-6 Higher Percentage of Low Income Students

16. Percentage of Low Income Students

17. Relationship between Poverty and DSTP Pass Rates

18. 2010 AYP Determinations

19. 2 Key Factors Impacting AYP Rising Performance Standards Cell Counts

20. Rising Performance Standards 75% 84%

21. School Performance

22. Rising Performance Standards Superior Academic Review

23. Cell Counts School “A” % Meeting the Standard 2010 Goal All Students85%80% White85%80% Black86%80% Special Education 77% 80% Low Income81%80% School “B” % Meeting the Standard 2010 Goal All Students85%80% White85%80% Black86%80% Special Education 45%80% Low Income75%80% Which School Missed AYP?

24. MUST HAVE >40 STUDENTS TO COUNT School “A” % Meeting the Standard Number of students Result? All Students85%400GOOD White85%240GOOD Black86%150GOOD Special Education 77%100MISS Low Income81%100GOOD School “B” % Meeting the Standard Number of students Result? All Students85%200GOOD White85%100GOOD Black86%50GOOD Special Education 45%25 DOES NOT COUNT Low Income75%38 DOES NOT COUNT

25. Statewide AYP-Meeting Schools by Type Type# MeetingTotalPercent Elementary Schools 549159% Middle Schools 33110% High Schools33010%

26. School/Program Evaluation Demographics (Enrollment; Attendance; Grad. Rate; Ethnicity; Gender; College Attendance) Perceptions (Values, Beliefs, Attitudes Regarding the Learning Environment) Student Learning (Standardized Tests; Norm Referenced Tests; Portfolios; Curriculum Benchmarks) School Processes (Descriptions of School Programs)

27. MHS: Commendable Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianN/A HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeN/A

28. AHS: Academic Review Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Below AsianN/A HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeN/A

29. AGW: Superior Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianMeets HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.Meets LowIncomeMeets

30. MMS: Academic Progress Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianN/A HispanicMeets WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.Below LowIncomeMeets

31. RMS: Academic Progress Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianMeets HispanicMeets WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.Below LowIncomeMeets

32. BHE: Superior Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianN/A HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeMeets

33. BME: Superior Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianN/A HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeMeets

34. CLE: Superior Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianN/A HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeMeets

35. OBL: Superior Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianMeets HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeMeets

36. SLE: Academic Watch Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.BelowMeets AsianN/A HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeMeets

37. TES: Superior Subgroup Reading Result Math Result AllMeets Nat. Amer.N/A Af. Amer.Meets AsianN/A HispanicN/A WhiteMeets ELLN/A Spec. Ed.N/A LowIncomeMeets

38. Percentage Low Income by Appo School

39. 2010 Key Areas of Focus

40. Appoquinimink Key Areas of Focus New Student Performance Elementary Special Education Performance High Performing Students

41. The Scope of the Number of New Students Entering For the 2010 DSTP testing session, 6363 students were tested. 661 were not enrolled in Appoquinimink School District last year. That’s roughly 1 in 10 students new to the District, or about 2 or 3 per class.

42. New Student Reading Performance

43. New Student Math Performance

44. Special Education Percentage that Meets the Standard ReadingAppo % MeetsState % Meets Elementary30%42% Middle39%33% High37%21% All35%34% MathAppo % MeetsState % Meets Elementary31%44% Middle35%27% High32%17% All33%31%

45. Reading National Percentile Ranks Spring 2010 from MAP Assessment

46. Math National Percentile Ranks Spring 2010 (from MAP Assessment )

47. Thank You