1. Any Person, Any Study: Race and Writing in the Cornell First-Year Writing Seminar Christine “Xine” Yao | PhD Candidate in English | Graduate Research and Teaching Fellow Context and Questions March 2012: Cornell created the university-wide diversity initiative “Toward New Destinations” Sara Ahmed, prominent scholar of race and gender, critiques whether diversity initiatives engage issues or simply act as PR for institutions of higher education (On Being Included 2012) I wondered: 1) How might mandatory first-year writing seminars enable undergraduate learners to engage with topics of race as a facet of diversity? 2) How does an institutional mandate trickle down from administration to on the ground pedagogical and learning practices? Terms and Methodology First-year writing seminar: mandatory requirement for all undergraduate students at Cornell; consists of a maximum of 18 students; run through the Knight Institute for Writing in the Disciplines; focus on writing not diversity My study consists of a combination of student surveys (Likert scale and open-ended questions) and instructor interviews about attitudes and practices on race and writing in first-year writing seminars 4 first-year writing seminars surveyed 54 student responses 6 instructors interviewed Conclusions About Teaching and Learning Student responses indicate the helpfulness of the first-year writing seminar for learning about race but writing is not seen as essential to the process Students value peers as much or more than instructors: importance of horizontal teaching approaches The first-year writing seminar is a valuable site for undergraduates to engage with diversity on an academic level because of the seminar format, its nature as a mandatory requirement, and potential to have the greatest variety of Cornell undergraduates as peers Conclusions About Diversity at Cornell No students or instructors knew about “Toward New Destinations” but all thought the sentiment was important Due to the potential for the first-year writing seminar to act as a site for engagement with diversity, instructors should be equipped to deal with the topic regardless of the focus of their class Given the student preference for discussions as a means for learning, it is expected that instructors too would benefit from having ongoing forums for discussion to develop best practices Student Survey Comments Suggestions for Teaching Race and Writing “Students should be urged to identify and abandon westernized thinking when trying to analyze diverse texts” “Little activities regarding race and identity. Try to make things personal” “Relating modern-day perceptions of race to the literature that we read” Perspectives on Successful Lessons “Discussion between students that brings ideas from different people together and gives new light for students in the class” “Examples of historical/cultural contexts for literature are helpful, as well as guided discussions” Analysis: student preference for discussion as a mode for learning about race indicates a wariness of writing despite stated confidence Instructor Interview Comments Student Attitudes and Difficulties Students tend to engage in “Pushing back on well-intentioned but ultimately problematically under-thought commitments to universal humanism and a restrictive definition of racism as only a matter of personal feeling” “They seem hesitant to say the wrong thing but definitely interested and appreciate the conversations.” Tactics for Teaching “They really seem to respond to the documentary format. I also teach texts writing by North American Native people alongside the Westerners that portray them, and the contrast is useful for students” “I’ve also related themes from that same novel to more recent cultural texts they can relate to. I require my students to connect various themes (including racism) to works or current events that are important to them.” I would found an institution where any person can find instruction in any study. Ezra Cornell, 1868 Note on Graphs: Data drawn from student surveys n = 54 5.4%